Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

mti T1 vs TR 224 112

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2005, 12:00 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vader99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default mti T1 vs TR 224 112 vs futral f2

Hey guys, I have done alot of searching on these boards. I still have a few questions.

Right now I would just like to know how the TR224 112 compares to the MTI T1 112 cam and to the futral f2 (224 224 588 588 112)?

Which one is more streetable/behaves better?
Which one would give better numbers?
Which one would provide the most amount of lowend?

My car is 99 TA WS6 6 speed with all of the boltons.

thanks......

Last edited by vader99; 02-25-2005 at 12:22 AM.
Old 02-25-2005, 12:41 AM
  #2  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

The F2 will be the most driveable out of the bunch, but all should be similar in power.
Old 02-25-2005, 06:00 AM
  #3  
fff
Staging Lane
 
fff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the T1 and after it warms up, it is almost like stock. No surging, stalling, etc... Cold, it lopes a little and surges under 2k. I have an M6 with 4.10's and I did get the car tuned after the cam. If you are looking for great power on a baby cam that drives like stock and is relatively easy on the valvetrain, the T1 gets my vote.
Old 02-25-2005, 06:22 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

They are all in the same power range, close your eyes, pick one and go to town.
Old 02-25-2005, 07:01 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

T1 is the most driveable...I had it...
TR224 and F2 will make more power across the board. get either of these
Old 02-25-2005, 05:38 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vader99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

All other facts aside, I guess I am just trying to get a response as to how sluggish these cams will feel under 2000 rpm's compared to the stock cam.

Will they make as much torque as the stock cam in those rpm's or will they be lacking until they hit 2000 rpm's or so?

Will a person have to slip/ride the clutch more on easy/normal 1st gear takeoffs, especially since I am staying with the stock 3.42's for now?

We all now that every aftermarket cam will make quite a bit more hp/torque in the upper rpm's, but how about below 2000? All dyno graphs usually start at 2000 or 2500 so it is hard to research this concern.

thanks for your help once again.....
Old 02-25-2005, 06:56 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
 
racrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Golds Gym
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the B1, same as a T1 but on a 114. I made 386hp at the wheels, stock tune, with all the bolt ons. No dyno tricks, stock 342's. Car idles well, slight lope, and pulls like stock till about 2200rpm, then rips!! No drivability issues. Imho, this is one of the best all around cams ever made, especially for an old fart like me.
Old 02-25-2005, 07:34 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
glennster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can vouch for the B1,I have it in a lunati grind.Its pulls hard all the way to 6600 and with 4.10's its way over stock down low too.I have a new ram clutch and M/T drag radials so i know this cam will take me to high 11's and still be way streetable.
Old 02-25-2005, 07:50 PM
  #9  
Launching!
 
nspr8td lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: miami
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the t1 cam is PIMP. very smooth idle and apexman made 380 with unported mac's.
Old 02-25-2005, 09:55 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
zamboxl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunrise Fl
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nspr8td lt1
the t1 cam is PIMP. very smooth idle and apexman made 380 with unported mac's.
i have a tr224 untuned and even cold it idles fine there is a lope but hey thats part of the plesure of getting a cam, it is not to strong under 1.5k but then agian iam not tuned so thast part of the problem. It makes pleny of power lets just say than on the street if i launch her over 2k rpm the back will swing around on me and i'll get no traction, so iam happy with it.
Old 02-26-2005, 07:31 AM
  #11  
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Hemi Killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was wondering the same thing about the F2 cam under 2000 rpms.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.