Who has the biggest Twin Turbos?
09-23-2005, 05:20 AM
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It funny when ya see that car in a pic with noone aroudn it it looks liek regular size. In the other pic on that page it looks like a toy car. What size are the twins on casper? I didnt knwo they had only 352ci. That is amazing. GL
John
John
09-23-2005, 09:25 AM
#7
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cool Yea what size are those turbos?? I wonder how much money went into that car, I thought the record was still in the 7's lol 
Very nice setup though. I am waiting on my quote from them on back halfing my car, ite been like 5 days
Very nice setup though. I am waiting on my quote from them on back halfing my car, ite been like 5 days
Trending Topics
09-23-2005, 10:44 AM
#11
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JZ 97 SS 1500
We have a customer with a street driven C5 running Twin T70's on a 427 LSX.
Jose
Jose
09-23-2005, 12:24 PM
#14
Increasing displacement allows your turbo envelope to increase as far as what you can fit and the related spool that comes with it.
You start to get into surge and other problems with turbos that are too large for the given displacement. If the car is like casper, where it almost never sees below 3500 under load, and never sees the street, you can push that turbo envelope much further.
You start to get into surge and other problems with turbos that are too large for the given displacement. If the car is like casper, where it almost never sees below 3500 under load, and never sees the street, you can push that turbo envelope much further.
09-23-2005, 02:08 PM
#18
the reason they backed it down was not because they were scared ,but because they were putting so much air through the motor that the air reached suppersonic speed and would shut the engine down,the only thing to do was to put smaller turbos or more restricktive heads.
09-23-2005, 02:23 PM
#19
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Elk Grove, IL
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the reason they backed it down was not because they were scared ,but because they were putting so much air through the motor that the air reached suppersonic speed and would shut the engine down,the only thing to do was to put smaller turbos or more restricktive heads.
if thats true then
