sweet thunder cat-back?
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North Dallas DFW
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sweet thunder cat-back?
I was wondering if anyone has attempted to fab together a cat-back system with a sweet thunder chambered muffler in the i-pipe. kind of like a sweet thunder-mouth. i assume the 18 inch 3 in-3 out muffler would work? i would be very interested in this system after i get my Lt's and ORY soon. anyone heard of somebody doing this? any thoughts?!?!?!
#3
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whoa whoa thats expensive....I bought my car used with a LM already installed with stock manifolds/cats. I was just really dissapointed with the quality of sound with the LM, and to be honest, the overall noise as well. I bought the Stainless Steel 18" Sweet Thunder for $70, and installed it in place of the resonator. It sounded better, but basically just as loud. The sound quality was better, a little deeper, and not as much resonance inside. Even though the differences aren't night and day, for $70, I think its worth it. I ended up selling the complete catback to a member and bought a Corsa for something a little more civil and quiet. So ya, thats all I got for ya...
#5
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Shawnee, OK
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's been done by several others on this board. I've heard it's pretty loud.
I know the sweet thunders sound great on a True dual setup with an x pipe.
Try doing a search on this subject for more answers...
I know the sweet thunders sound great on a True dual setup with an x pipe.
Try doing a search on this subject for more answers...
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AINT SKEERED
How well does a sweet thunder flow?
yes please anybody with this info, Im interested in switching my LM to a Sweet Thunders in the I-Pipe....dont want to lose too much flow/hp
#10
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chattanoga TN
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AbsolutHank
I was just really dissapointed with the quality of sound with the LM, and to be honest, the overall noise as well.
#11
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well i bought a Texas Speed catback and replaced the Dynomax in the I-pipe with a Sweet Thunder bullet. From there, it's straight-thru pipes out the back.
It's the best sounding exhaust that I've put on my T/A so far, but I do worry that I've lost a few ponies since the core is only 2.5" opposed to the 3" core of the Dynomax.
here's a couple of clips I took:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-external-engine/384976-sound-clips-you-guys-tsp-rumbler-vs-sweet-thunder-stock-manifolds-vids.html
It's the best sounding exhaust that I've put on my T/A so far, but I do worry that I've lost a few ponies since the core is only 2.5" opposed to the 3" core of the Dynomax.
here's a couple of clips I took:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-external-engine/384976-sound-clips-you-guys-tsp-rumbler-vs-sweet-thunder-stock-manifolds-vids.html
#12
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Levelland/lubbock TX
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have An 18" Sweet thunder welded in the I pipe, and just had my local exhaust shop fab up the rest. It sounds awsome, and as far as flow goes im sure it was better than the "flowcrappers" i had on the car before.