PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2003, 06:44 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
MYBLKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sewell, NJ
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

Converter lock-up is unpredicable after cam install. Which has led me to do some research and there seems to be two different ways to solove the problem.

1. Set the Misfire detection temp between 139-140
or
2. Move the values in the idle by cycle & low rpm by cycle tables to 32000

Which technique works the best?
Old 03-06-2003, 07:09 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
NoGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mass
Posts: 2,678
Received 35 Likes on 21 Posts

Default Re: Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

Turning the code off works best. Rather turning the TEST off works best. Set the P0300 test to Type X.

<small>[ March 06, 2003, 07:10 PM: Message edited by: NoGo ]</small>
Old 03-06-2003, 10:12 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
MYBLKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sewell, NJ
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

So I should set the values in the misfire detection table to 139 and 140.
Old 03-06-2003, 11:07 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
gojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: w.s.n.c.
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> 2. Move the values in the idle by cycle & low rpm by cycle tables to 32000 </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Try this way first. If it works it's the best way, since completely turning off the tests means you will not detect true misfire.

<small>[ March 06, 2003, 11:08 PM: Message edited by: gojo ]</small>
Old 03-07-2003, 08:11 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
MYBLKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sewell, NJ
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

what do the values (32000) represent. Does it represent the total number of misfires? Last night I autotapped the car and most of the time the car kept misfires per cylinder in the single digits, but when I came to a stop some cylinders jumped up as high as 26.
Old 03-07-2003, 10:08 AM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Sonny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: DFW
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MYBLKSS:
<strong> what do the values (32000) represent. Does it represent the total number of misfires? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">it is a time interval (I think it is in millisecond) that PCM checks for misfires.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> when I came to a stop some cylinders jumped up as high as 26. [/QB]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">This is reason you want to set the low rpm tables to 32000.

Good luck,
Old 03-07-2003, 06:57 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
MYBLKSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sewell, NJ
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

Thanks sonny called my tuner today hope to get it fixed soon, but at least I know whats wrong with it now.
Old 03-07-2003, 08:36 PM
  #8  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,044
Likes: 0
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default Re: Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by NoGo:
<strong> Turning the code off works best. Rather turning the TEST off works best. Set the P0300 test to Type X. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">IIRC, The test is either toggled on or off. The "Type X" is what you want to set the field for that asks "Does error set SES?". Type X = turned off, but that just keeps the DTC from being stored and the MIL from being commanded on from what I understand. The diagnostic test and the SES type are separate toggle fields.

I found that even with the test and the SES off, I still lock-up issues until I maxed out the misfire tables in the idle and low rpm ranges. I set them all to 32,767 or whatever the max is, now I get lockup every time. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Old 03-11-2003, 12:37 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
02BlackWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Best way to solve misfire detection problem after cam Install?

RPM WS6,

You're correct...Turning the P0300 code off will not help with the lock-up issue. I have EDIT and a Vig3600 converter and the only way to get consistant converter lock-up is to set both values to 150, which is max. Because even though the code is turned off, if the PCM sees misfires it will cause lock-up issues, even though a SES light isn't set or a code isn't stored.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 AM.