Corvette Performance
C5 | Z06 | C6 | ZR1 | C7

what would you do?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2006, 06:54 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
c5_ls1_6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default what would you do?

my Cam only(226/226) C5 dyno'd 407rwhp/370rwtq.
should i invest my money on a throttle body and MAF, for some additonal improved airflow?
Old 04-29-2006, 07:01 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by c5_ls1_6spd
my Cam only(226/226) C5 dyno'd 407rwhp/370rwtq.
should i invest my money on a throttle body and MAF, for some additonal improved airflow?


ahh,..TB may end up helping out some. You can even port yours. I wouldn't change the MAF though.

We changed three maf's on the dyno. Ls6, CTS-V ls6(screened), and a stock one with composite ends. The one with the screen worked out the best for my car.
Old 04-29-2006, 07:05 PM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
c5_ls1_6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V-seriesTech
ahh,..TB may end up helping out some. You can even port yours. I wouldn't change the MAF though.

We changed three maf's on the dyno. Ls6, CTS-V ls6(screened), and a stock one with composite ends. The one with the screen worked out the best for my car.

so the stock MAF worked the best?
how much more can be had with a TB?
Old 04-29-2006, 07:59 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
MICAH HERRON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Johnsonville, SC; but orginally from GAINESVILLE, FL
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by c5_ls1_6spd
so the stock MAF worked the best?
how much more can be had with a TB?
What intake do you have now? I would leave the stock MAF in for sure, aftermarket MAFs tend to turn into a waste vice any worthwild gains.

Maybe a FAST 90/90 with the FAST TB, but that is some bank right there.
Old 04-29-2006, 08:08 PM
  #5  
KFK
On The Tree
iTrader: (9)
 
KFK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kingston IL
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I agree with V. I also saw first hand my stock MAF worked best on my car also.
Old 04-29-2006, 09:02 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
zo6vetteman2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Middleboro Ma.
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There is a whole list of things to do to increase airflow, and none of it is cheap from now on. I also agree about the stock MAF it can support 650hp. You did the first thing, a cam. Now you need to look at some heads. I would buy the LSX 90 and LS2/LS7 90mm throttlebody soon after. Are you running longtubes?
Old 04-29-2006, 10:04 PM
  #7  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
c5_ls1_6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zo6vetteman2003
There is a whole list of things to do to increase airflow, and none of it is cheap from now on. I also agree about the stock MAF it can support 650hp. You did the first thing, a cam. Now you need to look at some heads. I would buy the LSX 90 and LS2/LS7 90mm throttlebody soon after. Are you running longtubes?
well i wasn't trying to get that serious about a TB, i was thinking of just maybe a ported one because i think that the FAST 90/90 combo would be overkill for my cam only 346cid C5. what can be potentially gained from a fast 90/90 vs just a ported TB?

yes i do i have longtubes.
Old 04-29-2006, 11:16 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
zo6vetteman2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Middleboro Ma.
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by c5_ls1_6spd
well i wasn't trying to get that serious about a TB, i was thinking of just maybe a ported one because i think that the FAST 90/90 combo would be overkill for my cam only 346cid C5. what can be potentially gained from a fast 90/90 vs just a ported TB?

yes i do i have longtubes.
I was saying heads would be a good choice for your next mod, then a FAST 90/90 combo. If you spend say $350 on a throttlebody you would ultimately end up selling, or tossing it if you wanted to go with the FAST intake later, because the throttlebody will not fit the LSX. If you are looking for more air, go with a higher ratio roller rocker. You would gain additional lift.
Old 04-30-2006, 03:14 AM
  #9  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
c5_ls1_6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what can be potentially gained from a fast 90/90 vs just a ported TB?
Old 04-30-2006, 03:47 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Drewstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

FAST 90/LS2 TB combo or throw on a 100 shot. The FAST TB is junk.
Old 04-30-2006, 07:38 PM
  #11  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
c5_ls1_6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drewstein
FAST 90/LS2 TB combo or throw on a 100 shot. The FAST TB is junk.

so how much can i potentially gain by adding a FAST 90/LS2 TB combo to my current setup?
no nitrous, i'm not interested in going that route.
Old 04-30-2006, 08:24 PM
  #12  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
zo6vetteman2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Middleboro Ma.
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by c5_ls1_6spd
what can be potentially gained from a fast 90/90 vs just a ported TB?
20-25hp You could do heads after too, doesn't matter which is first.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.