Fahad

Befor my car run 13.98@110 , now after i install the Hooker LT with custom Ypip 2.5" , and i finish from ported MAF, TB and the finally, custom made flange cutout 2.5".

The different on the G-tech :

Befor 13.98@110 0/100 5.7sec

Now 13.50@114 0/100 5.1sec

What is your opinion guys ??

JF WS6

Fahad,

You'll probably have to use a more accurate scource than a G-tek. You should be probably in the low 13's to high 12's.

--JF

Big Ty

To put a perspective on things, my car runs 12.84 @ 111 with a 2.0 60'
You probably picked up 4/10 but I'm sure your faster than 13.5 <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />

simpsonsruleWS6

13.98 and 13.50 seem like pretty high numbers so I wonder about the accuracy, but whatever the numbers you definately seem to have made your car faster. Being from Kuwait maybe it's the desert heat slowing you down. <img border="0" alt="[burn out]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_burnout.gif" />

mike c.

iTrader: (1)

you need a track! my ws.6 m6 ran 13.4s stock,then when i learned the christmas tree and how to drive better still stock it went 13.2's. you should be LOW 13'S TO HI 12'S EASY,as jf ws6 said. goodluck

JF WS6

If the G-tech is accurate on ET's, but off on MPH it would be tough to guage how much power your car is putting out. Many people have said MPH is one of your best sources for determining what kind of power your car has and what it's potential is.

ET's don't really matter as much because they can be a function of how good of a driver you are which may not have anything to do with what your car is potentially capable of.

Abdulla

Fahad

Congratulation man for your new stuff , seems that your car is getting better and better , Mashalla <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

Fahad , you better go to the track and test your car , call me when you want to go .

Take care and good luck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

Salam

Abdulla

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by simpsonsruleWS6:
<strong> Being from Kuwait maybe it's the desert heat slowing you down. <img border="0" alt="[burn out]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_burnout.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Hey man , good morning , are you sleeping or what <img border="0" alt="[boring]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_zzz.gif" /> ??? some places in Kuwait now are in 0 C degree and less ...... what heat you are talking about ??? we are playing skati on our ice <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

hmmmmmm , or maybe you are meaning something else ?? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />

becarefull

Abdulla

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by JF WS6:
<strong> If the G-tech is accurate on ET's, but off on MPH it would be tough to guage how much power your car is putting out. Many people have said MPH is one of your best sources for determining what kind of power your car has and what it's potential is.

ET's don't really matter as much because they can be a function of how good of a driver you are which may not have anything to do with what your car is potentially capable of. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Thank you man .... YOU ARE THE MAN <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> .... its a good point .... thats what I am trying to tell everyone about it .... it doesn't metter what car's E.T. is ..... the MPH is more important

thanks and take care <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

SSTYCOON

iTrader: (2)

forget the g-tech that thing is incorrect
with that trap speed you would not be running a high-mid 13s.
no way

Sears

The mph on the Gtech is higher then what you see at the track because at the track your trap speed is the average over the last 66ft. Whereas the Gtech gives your final speed, not an average.

Justin

Serial Thriller

The G-Tech may not be the most accurate thing as far as times, but it seems to be fairly consistent, so it gives a decent idea of 'before and after' changes.

quik 99SS

I heard that the ET is fairly close to the track time, but the MPH would be off due to the way the Gtech calculates it

Fahad

Thanks guys,

Ok..What is the better than G-Tech ?

After one or two weeks i will have lower box, what do you think whene i install it , I mean did will be better in MPH ? and your opinion plz in this!

Thanks
Fahad

HITMANSS

The GTech has proven to be very accurate and consisten, up to a point. As already pointed out, MPH will be a little high. ET's will be higher on the street than at the track because of traction issues. But run-to-run, the times should be right on.

I have seen several guys do GTech readings at the track, and they were consistently within .05 secs of the track times.

OvalHunter

13.15 @ 108mph (Mid-Mich Motorplex in Oct)after Hooker LT install. see sig

redz_02

iTrader: (4)

g-techs are pretty accurate depending on how striat the road is and on inlines. I usualy run a 13.3@114 on my gtech with my 02 z28 have an airlid and borla.

Fahad

Any way..Thanks guys for everything