C6 Z06 vs. Camaro. *Video*
06-17-2006, 03:07 PM
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C6 Z06 vs. Camaro. *Video* Sup gang. I met up with "Whplash" today, an LS1tech forum member. Here is a video of my C6 Z06 and his Camaro.
It was a pleasure meeting you bro. Your car is awesome. I hope that we are able to meet and have some fun times once again. Take care.
http://video.ls1tech.com/video/d9640...772c2775a9.htm
It was a pleasure meeting you bro. Your car is awesome. I hope that we are able to meet and have some fun times once again. Take care.
http://video.ls1tech.com/video/d9640...772c2775a9.htm
Last edited by Fadi; 06-17-2006 at 05:57 PM.
06-17-2006, 05:06 PM
#7
Originally Posted by 01RedT/A
you got an awesome launch on that last one. it didnt seem like you hit 90, but still fun. good vid.
Anyway, I didn't notice the S/C in the mod list at first, I thought it was just a H/C LS1 which seemed right for the results, maybe it's not tuned for the S/C particular well or something. Even lousy HotRod TV got 540rwhp outta their H/C + procharger LS1 setup after tuning.
Trending Topics
06-17-2006, 05:13 PM
#9
Launching!
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Camaro Fan
Had to be pretty close, 1st gear takes the Z06 to 60mph and it wound out a fair bit of second past that...
Anyway, I didn't notice the S/C in the mod list at first, I thought it was just a H/C LS1 which seemed right for the results, maybe it's not tuned for the S/C particular well or something. Even lousy HotRod TV got 540rwhp outta their H/C + procharger LS1 setup after tuning.
Anyway, I didn't notice the S/C in the mod list at first, I thought it was just a H/C LS1 which seemed right for the results, maybe it's not tuned for the S/C particular well or something. Even lousy HotRod TV got 540rwhp outta their H/C + procharger LS1 setup after tuning.
06-17-2006, 05:15 PM
#10
Originally Posted by Camaro Fan
Had to be pretty close, 1st gear takes the Z06 to 60mph and it wound out a bit of second past that...
Anyway, I didn't notice the S/C in the mod list at first, I thought it was just a H/C LS1 which seemed right for the results, maybe it's not tuned for the S/C particular well or something. Even lousy HotRod TV got 540rwhp outta their H/C + procharger LS1 setup after tuning.
Anyway, I didn't notice the S/C in the mod list at first, I thought it was just a H/C LS1 which seemed right for the results, maybe it's not tuned for the S/C particular well or something. Even lousy HotRod TV got 540rwhp outta their H/C + procharger LS1 setup after tuning.
06-17-2006, 05:31 PM
#11
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: htown
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Should've went turbo.
Supercharger rarely make the power you expect it to. Remember they are belt driven, so the power is more likely to lower. Plus they just dont have the top end as a turbo.
Supercharger rarely make the power you expect it to. Remember they are belt driven, so the power is more likely to lower. Plus they just dont have the top end as a turbo.
06-17-2006, 07:10 PM
#14
Originally Posted by 25psi
Should've went turbo.
Supercharger rarely make the power you expect it to. Remember they are belt driven, so the power is more likely to lower. Plus they just dont have the top end as a turbo.
Supercharger rarely make the power you expect it to. Remember they are belt driven, so the power is more likely to lower. Plus they just dont have the top end as a turbo.
same goes for the turbo size
06-17-2006, 07:38 PM
#17
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 25psi
Should've went turbo.
Supercharger rarely make the power you expect it to. Remember they are belt driven, so the power is more likely to lower. Plus they just dont have the top end as a turbo.
Supercharger rarely make the power you expect it to. Remember they are belt driven, so the power is more likely to lower. Plus they just dont have the top end as a turbo.
06-17-2006, 07:51 PM
#18
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern VA
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rubber duck
And turbos don't have the low end of a supercharger, especially a roots driven car. I take it you've never taken a ride in a twin screw car, no turbo can replicate that feeling. The D1SC is no joke either. Apples and oranges.
But how in the hell did a 490 whp supercharged/h/c/i LS1 (on a mustang dyno...) lose to what is probably a 460 whp vette (dynojet). And that bad... Maybe traction?
06-17-2006, 08:19 PM
#20
Launching!
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LSINA7
But how in the hell did a 490 whp supercharged/h/c/i LS1 (on a mustang dyno...) lose to what is probably a 460 whp vette (dynojet). And that bad... Maybe traction?