Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Am i loosing HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2006, 08:47 AM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Am i loosing HP

ok i know that this should be in the sticky, but i will get better response here.

i hope that Casey and Jordan chime in..

Here i go.. As some of you know i jsut recently got True Duals on my t/a. i got non mandrel bends, and now i jsut got QTP LTs. with the TD being non mandrel bend, am i really loosing that much HP?? the piping is 3" all the way back, and where the bends are i say it goes down to about 2 3/4"

A buddy of mine, his friend had a non mandrel bent TD system and had LTs and said that he dynoed his car it seemed low for his application. lets say he dynoed with the non mandrel bends TD at 330 RWHP. He then got mandrel bend TDs and gained 30RWHP.. Can this be true???

Again am i loosing HP??????

thanks..
Old 08-23-2006, 08:55 AM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
jmm98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KS
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Unless those crush bends were done by a 4 yr old, no way did your buddy gain 30rwhp by changing nothing more than the bends in his exhaust.

Seeing pics of your exhaust, I really don't think you're going to be leaving much if any power on the table, especially since it's 3" and you're running stock internals.
Old 08-23-2006, 08:57 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
2000TransAmWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Danville, VA
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think that you're probably losing some (maybe 5-7 hp), but not very much. two pipes that are 2-3/4 are going to flow better than one 3 inch pipe... it is probably not a good max effort set up, but is still probably very good for a street car.
Old 08-23-2006, 09:38 AM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
Iron Sights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

2.5" will flow sufficiently for stock internal, and most mild cam setups. You really don't need 3" until 500+bhp.
Old 08-23-2006, 09:45 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmm98LS1
Unless those crush bends were done by a 4 yr old, no way did your buddy gain 30rwhp by changing nothing more than the bends in his exhaust.

Seeing pics of your exhaust, I really don't think you're going to be leaving much if any power on the table, especially since it's 3" and you're running stock internals.

LOL, nope done by a very good guy. he has a shop and has aformula so he treated it like his car..

My buddy all he changed was non mandrel bend to mandrel bends. that is it.. i think that is strange???????

Thanks
Old 08-23-2006, 09:45 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2000TransAmWS6
i think that you're probably losing some (maybe 5-7 hp), but not very much. two pipes that are 2-3/4 are going to flow better than one 3 inch pipe... it is probably not a good max effort set up, but is still probably very good for a street car.

that is what i thought too.. maybe 3-5 i was losing. and now with the LTs i hope to gain some back b/c i am on stock manifolds
Old 08-23-2006, 09:46 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iron Sights
2.5" will flow sufficiently for stock internal, and most mild cam setups. You really don't need 3" until 500+bhp.

yea you're right. i jsut wanted 3" jsut to be a little louder...
Old 08-23-2006, 10:48 AM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bigman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Put it this way, with the headers and the crush bent true duals, you will still out flow a 3 inch Y pipe car.
Old 08-25-2006, 09:30 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
2000LS1Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: I-L-L-I-N-O-I-S
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmm98LS1
Unless those crush bends were done by a 4 yr old, no way did your buddy gain 30rwhp by changing nothing more than the bends in his exhaust.

Seeing pics of your exhaust, I really don't think you're going to be leaving much if any power on the table, especially since it's 3" and you're running stock internals.
Actually, he did. My friend Chris (black_knight) who posts regularly on this board dynoed exactly 364rwhp in his cam only '99 Formula with a crush/non-mandrel bent true dual set-up (LT's, no cats, 3" X-pipe, & Flo Pro Twisters out the back). By ONLY changing over to a 3" mandrel bent true dual set-up dumped, he re-dynoed at 393rwhp on the same exact dynojet chassis. And if I'm not mistaken, weather conditions weren't much different. Again though, nothing else was changed except the exhaust after the offroad pipes...

I can have him post up the dyno sheets if you'd like?

Mike
Old 08-26-2006, 09:22 AM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
jmm98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KS
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Those crush bends must have had some ridiculous kinks in them if he picked up that much power by switching to mandrel bends.
Old 08-26-2006, 09:33 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmm98LS1
Those crush bends must have had some ridiculous kinks in them if he picked up that much power by switching to mandrel bends.

hhahah werd LOL
Old 08-26-2006, 09:59 AM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

even with the crush bends they still should outflow a mandrel 2 1/2 system.alot of people only pick up 30 hp or so going from a single 3" flowmaster to a true dual setup.
Old 08-26-2006, 10:04 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
 
2000LS1Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: I-L-L-I-N-O-I-S
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmm98LS1
Those crush bends must have had some ridiculous kinks in them if he picked up that much power by switching to mandrel bends.
I can't speak for how they were built and maybe they weren't the best...But I'm just telling you all what happened...
Old 08-26-2006, 10:09 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
lastcall190's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Helps for gains that he had a cam and was choking it with the crush bends, IMO... still impressive tho

-J
Old 08-26-2006, 10:32 AM
  #15  
TECH Resident
 
jpat1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Agreed^^^ If it was a stock internal car and switched to mandrel bends he might have seen a 5-10rwhp increase.
Old 08-27-2006, 06:19 AM
  #16  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
black_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Dyno graphs to prove it:

Crappy crush bent duals:
(Dyno run 002 is pre cam, 003 is after cam. Ignore tq spike for peak tq)



Good quality Speed Inc mandrel bent duals:

Old 08-27-2006, 04:12 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

hahah hey chris sorry to bring you in this..
Old 08-27-2006, 07:18 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
black_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It's alright. Obviously I'm not proud of that mistake, but at least I can spread the word.
Old 09-04-2006, 01:41 AM
  #19  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I would always do mandrel bends on any setup.
Old 09-04-2006, 08:09 AM
  #20  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
99Hawk262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have mandrel bends on my system up to the muffler and then "good" crush bends behind the muffler. I may be leaving some power on the table, but my trap speed says I'm running just fine. And 2.5" exhaust will support well over 500 horsepower. '03-04 Cobras run 2.25" or 2.5" inch and they get over 600 out of it. I believe the new GT 500 is also running 2.25", but don't quote me on that.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.