Spring Rates: Autocross vs. canyon carving vs. road racing
#1
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spring Rates: Autocross vs. canyon carving vs. road racing
Ok, so I've been on the website showing all of the different brands of springs, and their rates... but really it's just a bunch of numbers to me. I understand it in that the higher the rate, the stiffer the spring, but how does that effect my performance at either of the three scenarios that I listed in the title? I'm wanting to build my car for an autocross/canyon carving type setup more-so than the road racing aspect (i.e. typically lower speeds, quick acceleration, tight turns, etc.). So would I need to look for a really stiff spring, such as the LT1 Pro-kit, or something a little more tame like the 1LE or Hotchkis springs? I know that other aspects will play into the handling as well, but I'm really trying to get my spring choice down. Thanks.
#2
eibach prokit for LT1 is not good. i ran em and didn't like the variable rate. get adj coil overs with 500 to 600 lb linear springs up front and 150 lb springs out back, and konis, and strano's 35/22 swaybars, and a good alignment. the car will feel so much better with those. and good tires
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Greater Chattanooga
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's all about balance. You could have a capable car running several different setups.
General rule is drag racing you want soft springs and for all the above stuff you need stiffer ones general speaking. A lot of people use 600 front and 150 rear. But then you have to get the Koni's to match them or go coil overs. I dont' think there is going to be set answer for each on of them activities.
General rule is drag racing you want soft springs and for all the above stuff you need stiffer ones general speaking. A lot of people use 600 front and 150 rear. But then you have to get the Koni's to match them or go coil overs. I dont' think there is going to be set answer for each on of them activities.
#5
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
Originally Posted by [RT] ProjUltraZ
eibach prokit for LT1 is not good. i ran em and didn't like the variable rate. get adj coil overs with 500 to 600 lb linear springs up front and 150 lb springs out back, and konis, and strano's 35/22 swaybars, and a good alignment. the car will feel so much better with those. and good tires
Seriously, the LT1 springs aren't hateful and there are many worse ones. But they are too compromised in a few ways.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
#6
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
To answer the question. YMMV. You'll get a lot of differing opinions about what rates you need. Bottom line is that all the activities have something in common. You want balance and predictability and grip. But as road speeds vary the cars tend to become looser @ higher speeds. Which is why I just don't get why some folks run really high rear springs rates.
All I can tell you is this. My stuff is not only pretty well proven on a bigger scale for autox. But I've had a number of folks in my car on the street, and they'll also attest the car is very driveable and not scary or kidney-busting (and I have a lot of twisty roads around here to take them on test-drives). And I do run open track event from time to time, and I change very little from my autox setup to do it. Alignment, brake pads being the big changes.
All I can tell you is this. My stuff is not only pretty well proven on a bigger scale for autox. But I've had a number of folks in my car on the street, and they'll also attest the car is very driveable and not scary or kidney-busting (and I have a lot of twisty roads around here to take them on test-drives). And I do run open track event from time to time, and I change very little from my autox setup to do it. Alignment, brake pads being the big changes.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
#7
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless I was trying to seriously compete and make tuning changes after each run, which I'm not, I would just use the same setup for all 3 of those.
For canyon carving, I'd probably make sure I had a really big chisel. woka woka
For canyon carving, I'd probably make sure I had a really big chisel. woka woka
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by z28bryan
For canyon carving, I'd probably make sure I had a really big chisel. woka woka
But on a serious note, Sam has given some very good information...