Pretty cool photoshop (Probly NWS Though)
05-15-2007, 08:42 PM
#4
Question is...
Did they really start off with a hefty girl and make her look thin or did they start off with a Fox, then blow her up, then work their way back to normal? Hmmmm...
Did they really start off with a hefty girl and make her look thin or did they start off with a Fox, then blow her up, then work their way back to normal? Hmmmm...
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Trending Topics
05-15-2007, 10:24 PM
#8
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am going yo have to try and do something like that lol
I know that I can make people fat but never tried to thin someone out, anything is possible with photoshop!!!
I know that I can make people fat but never tried to thin someone out, anything is possible with photoshop!!!
05-15-2007, 10:31 PM
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: _Nor caL_ (Bay areA)
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Patrick G
Question is...
Did they really start off with a hefty girl and make her look thin or did they start off with a Fox, then blow her up, then work their way back to normal? Hmmmm...
Did they really start off with a hefty girl and make her look thin or did they start off with a Fox, then blow her up, then work their way back to normal? Hmmmm...
05-19-2007, 02:54 PM
#15
Originally Posted by Patrick G
Question is...
Did they really start off with a hefty girl and make her look thin or did they start off with a Fox, then blow her up, then work their way back to normal? Hmmmm...
Did they really start off with a hefty girl and make her look thin or did they start off with a Fox, then blow her up, then work their way back to normal? Hmmmm...
#1) you can see he is working in layer 2. Layer 1 is the original layer and the girl is heavy in that layer. So if he started with a skinny girl, there would he a layer with the skinny girl on it.
#2) you can clearly see that he selects his tools then performs an action the corresponds with that tool. If it was played backwards the action would be done first then you'd see him select the tool."
05-19-2007, 03:10 PM
#16
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by StealthZ06
"Anyone that's worked with photoshop can tell you that it's not played backwards..for many reasons.
#1) you can see he is working in layer 2. Layer 1 is the original layer and the girl is heavy in that layer. So if he started with a skinny girl, there would he a layer with the skinny girl on it.
#2) you can clearly see that he selects his tools then performs an action the corresponds with that tool. If it was played backwards the action would be done first then you'd see him select the tool."
#1) you can see he is working in layer 2. Layer 1 is the original layer and the girl is heavy in that layer. So if he started with a skinny girl, there would he a layer with the skinny girl on it.
#2) you can clearly see that he selects his tools then performs an action the corresponds with that tool. If it was played backwards the action would be done first then you'd see him select the tool."
I think he was referring to them taking a picture of a hot *** girl, and then blowing her up and saving that picture. Then starting a whole new photoshop session and making her look skinny again.
But i think that the hair gives it away that thats not the case.
