Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

need advice for crank/piston bore from 346cid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2007, 02:02 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
candlelit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default need advice for crank/piston bore from 346cid

My brother has brought to my attention of a summer project... rebuilding my 346 ci block. Since everyone is going to ask my goals/intentions... it's going to be a DD... mostly city driving but some highway driving. I'll be working on a budget, which is why my new plan is to go ALL N/A instead of forged & FI. I hope to get at least 525-575 rwhp out of my setup.

Anyone want to throw some numbers out there for a crank size & pistons & rod lengths? I think GM recommends nothing more than a 4.25" stroke for an LSx. Would I be able to use a 4.125" crank ... or maybe just going with a LS7 4" crank? Right now my internals (besides small-mid size cam) are stock, outside I've got ported LS6 heads & intake, & hooker long tube headers. I figured with a larger bore, my CR is going to be high... which will probably prevent me from throwing turbo on anytime... and I'm fine with that.

How much power am I capable of making with my block? Maybe talking larger bore, and a big cam.
Any thoughts on using a LS7 crank & rods? Would I have to shorten the LS7 crank to fit since the LS7 is used for dry-sump applications?

Last edited by candlelit; 06-04-2007 at 02:22 AM.
Old 06-04-2007, 04:03 AM
  #2  
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (160)
 
smok'nZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OKLAHOMA
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by candlelit
My brother has brought to my attention of a summer project... rebuilding my 346 ci block. Since everyone is going to ask my goals/intentions... it's going to be a DD... mostly city driving but some highway driving. I'll be working on a budget, which is why my new plan is to go ALL N/A instead of forged & FI. I hope to get at least 525-575 rwhp out of my setup.

Anyone want to throw some numbers out there for a crank size & pistons & rod lengths? I think GM recommends nothing more than a 4.25" stroke for an LSx. Would I be able to use a 4.125" crank ... or maybe just going with a LS7 4" crank? Right now my internals (besides small-mid size cam) are stock, outside I've got ported LS6 heads & intake, & hooker long tube headers. I figured with a larger bore, my CR is going to be high... which will probably prevent me from throwing turbo on anytime... and I'm fine with that.

How much power am I capable of making with my block? Maybe talking larger bore, and a big cam.
Any thoughts on using a LS7 crank & rods? Would I have to shorten the LS7 crank to fit since the LS7 is used for dry-sump applications?


Old 06-04-2007, 06:14 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well for starters you can only hone your shortblock,unless you take it and have it resleeved which these days you can get an ls7 or another block already resleeved for a decent price. i would stay with a 4" stroke with 6.125" rods and you have 382-383 cubes. to get 525-575 rw out of that type of combo would take a very max setup and you still may be on the low side but 475-500 rw is fairly easy with the right parts.
Old 06-04-2007, 11:19 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
candlelit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so basically 383 cubes would be the max I could get out of it? I'm leaning toward the 4" crank & the 6.125" rods. what pistons should I go with if I used that setup? will I need to get different heads?
Old 06-05-2007, 01:49 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by candlelit
so basically 383 cubes would be the max I could get out of it? I'm leaning toward the 4" crank & the 6.125" rods. what pistons should I go with if I used that setup? will I need to get different heads?
it depends on the cc of your heads and cam selection to figure out what pistons you want to order. i'd say around 11:0 -11:5 scr should be around where you want to be compression wise. if your heads flow pretty well with an m6 just guessing you should be around 465-475 rw or so with a decent sized cam like say a 238/242 or so.search for 383 combos and see what others are putting down.
Old 06-05-2007, 05:11 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
candlelit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow trap
it depends on the cc of your heads and cam selection to figure out what pistons you want to order. i'd say around 11:0 -11:5 scr should be around where you want to be compression wise. if your heads flow pretty well with an m6 just guessing you should be around 465-475 rw or so with a decent sized cam like say a 238/242 or so.search for 383 combos and see what others are putting down.
thanks man! that's GREAT info! I'll look into it
Old 06-05-2007, 11:40 PM
  #7  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by candlelit
so basically 383 cubes would be the max I could get out of it? I'm leaning toward the 4" crank & the 6.125" rods. what pistons should I go with if I used that setup? will I need to get different heads?
Actually I've seen quite a few 392 cubic inch motors on here. 2 x 3.1415 x 3.905 x 3.905 x 4.1 = 392.8194587075
Old 06-06-2007, 04:17 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
candlelit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg
Actually I've seen quite a few 392 cubic inch motors on here. 2 x 3.1415 x 3.905 x 3.905 x 4.1 = 392.8194587075
I've never been explained how they get those c.i. numbers?? such an easy & newbie question, but I'd like to know. pretty dumb on my part considering I'm talking about rebuilding the block.
Old 06-06-2007, 04:52 PM
  #9  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by candlelit
I've never been explained how they get those c.i. numbers?? such an easy & newbie question, but I'd like to know. pretty dumb on my part considering I'm talking about rebuilding the block.
2 x pi (3.1415) x bore x bore x stroke

It's really easy
Old 06-06-2007, 04:56 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by candlelit
I've never been explained how they get those c.i. numbers?? such an easy & newbie question, but I'd like to know. pretty dumb on my part considering I'm talking about rebuilding the block.
http://www.csgnetwork.com/cubicinchdispcalc.html

Old 06-06-2007, 07:24 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

if u want bore, go with a .060 over 6.0 block
with stock crank u will be at 375ci
and with 4 in. crank u will be at 414ci.
the heads u have now will make a mean tq monster
i would go and have always gone with a 6.0 iron block
only 60lb. dif. over alloy block. speed pro makes replacement
hypereutectic pistons that come in around 500$ with rings.
from 4.00-4.06 bore sizes.
just sthrowing some ideas out there that have worked for me.
i would stick with the stock crank and bore a 6.0 and put the heads u got now. still would put u over 500hp with the right cam.
Old 06-06-2007, 07:53 PM
  #12  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
if u want bore, go with a .060 over 6.0 block
with stock crank u will be at 375ci
and with 4 in. crank u will be at 414ci.
the heads u have now will make a mean tq monster
i would go and have always gone with a 6.0 iron block
only 60lb. dif. over alloy block. speed pro makes replacement
hypereutectic pistons that come in around 500$ with rings.
from 4.00-4.06 bore sizes.
just sthrowing some ideas out there that have worked for me.
i would stick with the stock crank and bore a 6.0 and put the heads u got now. still would put u over 500hp with the right cam.
Going .06 over on an iron block is asking for trouble. Can it be done? Yes, it can but sonic testing it is a must. Also at this point you are at the maximum bore capacity of the block. It can no longer be honed and is basically trash if you ever need / want to rebuild it. .030 is a much better option. There's many more off the shelf pistons available in that sizing along with greater reliability and block strength. It's not worth it to go .060 over for right around 5 cubic inches.
Old 06-06-2007, 08:45 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg
Going .06 over on an iron block is asking for trouble. Can it be done? Yes, it can but sonic testing it is a must. Also at this point you are at the maximum bore capacity of the block. It can no longer be honed and is basically trash if you ever need / want to rebuild it. .030 is a much better option. There's many more off the shelf pistons available in that sizing along with greater reliability and block strength. It's not worth it to go .060 over for right around 5 cubic inches.
that is true to some extent,
but im not turning 8k rpm and such,
using arp bolts for the mains and heads, i have put over 65k miles
with minor oil consumption.
i would not go .060 over for a forced induction or heavy n2o motor
i beleive he is looking for a n/a driver.
of course sonic testing would be recommended before machining and deciding
final bore size, the good thing is that these ls motors do suffer as much from
core shift like other production v8 blocks.
i made over 475 rwhp with this combo using ls6 243 heads.
on 375ci motor, .060 overbore. mild cam, all supporting mods, ls6 intake.
also have 150 dry halo shot on the motor.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 AM.