Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

anyone wanna guess my WHP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2007, 04:19 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
99DWPTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default anyone wanna guess my WHP

just wanna get a feel for how much my car will put down so i'm not dissapointed when it gets on the dyno.
2001 trans am stock ls1 bottom end
SLP ceramic coated long tubes
no cats-just 3 inch piping to slp y pipe
to gmmg exhaust
tci SSF 3600
stock 323 gear
fast 9090
slp intake kit
K&N filter
msd coils
msd spark plug wires
comp cams 230 234 110+2
com dual springs titanium retainers kit
comp pushrods
ls2 timing chain
tsp ported oil pump

thats about it.
so anyone got a guess?
car went 12.6 a month ago
minus fast 9090
and cam and valvetrain
on street tire
stock tune
Old 09-04-2007, 05:05 PM
  #2  
Launching!
 
gts500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

with un lock stall i think around 360 hp ! just my IMHO,
Old 09-04-2007, 05:08 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
99FormulaM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

385rwhp
Old 09-05-2007, 01:50 AM
  #4  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
99DWPTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the numbers i'm hearing dissapoint me. i mean a t FAST 9090 is soupose to claim what 20hp my exhaust i would hope makes a hell of alot more hp then stock and i dont exactly have a smaller cam. was hopin for 400whp. with all my mods it isnt realistic to make 100 more HP then stock?
Old 09-05-2007, 01:56 AM
  #5  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
99DWPTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i guess it dont madder as long as i get her goin faster down the track. with drag radials car shoulda went 12.3's now with cam and fast 9090 get her to go 11's on motor and 10's on spray!
Old 09-05-2007, 01:58 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
TXws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

387 locked
Old 09-05-2007, 04:41 AM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
RedWS6 00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England UK
Posts: 958
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99DWPTA
the numbers i'm hearing dissapoint me. i mean a t FAST 9090 is soupose to claim what 20hp my exhaust i would hope makes a hell of a lot more hp then stock and i dont exactly have a smaller cam. was hoping for 400whp. with all my mods it isnt realistic to make 100 more HP then stock?
That 20hp quoted for fast 90/90, isn't that at the engine, you loose 25% in the transmission giving you 15whp gain.

Stock car is 325hp at the engine, giving you 243whp.
Adding up your other mods I'd say you are around 370whp.

Add some heads, that will help. You have got good exhaust, good intake, good cam, the heads is the next step.

just my .2c.
Old 09-05-2007, 07:14 AM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (12)
 
mjcotroneo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: uptown dallas
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^^^^sorry but i have to correct you, no at the fly of a stock ls1 is 350.xhp and 375.x tq. rethink your numbers. didnt mean to sound like an *** but the ls1's were underrated.
Old 09-05-2007, 07:29 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
RedWS6 00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England UK
Posts: 958
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mjcotroneo
^^^^sorry but i have to correct you, no at the fly of a stock ls1 is 350.xhp and 375.x tq. rethink your numbers. didnt mean to sound like an *** but the ls1's were underrated.
No problem. Pontiac published the power output as 325hp. But Vettes rated the same engine at 350hp.
Old 09-05-2007, 07:50 AM
  #10  
TECH Resident
 
jamesSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 872
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think you will be around 380. Your stall is whats killing you when it comes to dyno numbers. If you can run 11's with that set-up, it dont matter what the dyno sheet says.
Old 09-05-2007, 11:22 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
TXws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

whats the lift on the cam?
Old 09-05-2007, 11:28 AM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
021less's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northeast Georgia
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jamesSS
I think you will be around 380. Your stall is whats killing you when it comes to dyno numbers. If you can run 11's with that set-up, it dont matter what the dyno sheet says.
exactly what he said, the stall hurts hp on the dyno but helps on the track. If it were a 6 speed with 10 bolt and 3.42's i would say yeah you could get in the 400 range, but the auto with the same set up and stalled will get you a better et than the 6 speed.
Old 09-05-2007, 12:11 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
99DWPTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

these cam specs were givin to me by patrick g
230/234 .612/.598 110LSA +2
Old 09-05-2007, 12:47 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Dragkid1917's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: new Jersey
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ull make good h/p just have them dyno it with the converter locked one time, i think ull hit the 400 no prob... u have full exaust, a cam, and a fast 90/90, and thats no baby cam.... with the converter locked i def think u should hit 400




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.