65 psi roots and twin turbo mustang 1200rwhp
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im hoping that the person that typed that up ment to hit the 3 but hit the 6 instead on the keypad on a keyboard. As i could see it takin 35 psi on a stock engine with all the restrictions but not 65. Thats insanity.
It does seem like a big gimmick though. But we will see.
John
It does seem like a big gimmick though. But we will see.
John
#14
wow, alot are missing the point....
take alook at the torque differences. shooting yourself in the foot with a heaton is quickly nulled by the fact your pushing more air in (and out)...giving you more "cubes" for larger turbos...
it is 44psi peak for 1,118hp, 65psi was tested.
take alook at the torque differences. shooting yourself in the foot with a heaton is quickly nulled by the fact your pushing more air in (and out)...giving you more "cubes" for larger turbos...
it is 44psi peak for 1,118hp, 65psi was tested.
#15
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
wow, alot are missing the point....
take alook at the torque differences. shooting yourself in the foot with a heaton is quickly nulled by the fact your pushing more air in (and out)...giving you more "cubes" for larger turbos...
it is 44psi peak for 1,118hp, 65psi was tested.
take alook at the torque differences. shooting yourself in the foot with a heaton is quickly nulled by the fact your pushing more air in (and out)...giving you more "cubes" for larger turbos...
it is 44psi peak for 1,118hp, 65psi was tested.
#17
4.6 mods are down on cubes comparitively to ls, but it would be interesting to compare to a similar level
opel and renault used this setup long ago, and did well with it. wouldn't expect the tnetics and hellion groups to do that bad in time, either.