Bolt on DYNO #'s
#5
Banned
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I put down 340/360 with K&N, SLP lid, Smooth bellows and a tune. If your untuned, thats pretty impressive. With a tune you should pick up more. Oh yeah, the dyno numbers are from Haddad Motorsports dynapack and their tuner George Lara (12secSS)did the tune. They did an awesome job.
#6
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yup, UNTUNED. only used HP TUNERS to turn off codes, elimate skip shift, and rear O2's.
yeah i ran at 14.2 A/F from 2400rpms to 4800rpms and then 13.8 A/F up until 6200rpms. a little on the lean side, but its a stock tune.
i have a wideband i just need to hook it to the car and start logging.
thanks guys i may just tune it and dyno again and then do the cam swap in 2weeks. because my springs and rods are on back order....
yeah i ran at 14.2 A/F from 2400rpms to 4800rpms and then 13.8 A/F up until 6200rpms. a little on the lean side, but its a stock tune.
i have a wideband i just need to hook it to the car and start logging.
thanks guys i may just tune it and dyno again and then do the cam swap in 2weeks. because my springs and rods are on back order....
#7
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not here to burst your bubble but those numbers aren't what your really putting down. You did that on a dynojet which shows much higher numbers. But impressive nonetheless. Get on a load dyno (example Mustand dyno) when you get it tuned.
Trending Topics
#8
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I need to get mine back on the dyno while the whether is cool to see what mine is putting down. I put down 303rwhp and 312lb/ft of torque BONE stock in an auto on our dynomite loader dyno. I have since added the lid, smooth bellow, LT's, ORY, and slp loudmouth. I now have the stock air box back on but it still feels the same. I guess cause I have a K&N??
#10
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i am using this dyno as my base line. since i have ordered a cam and wanted to see the difference on the same dyno.
also i wanted to point out how good the stock CME exhaust is i only gained
6hp/7tq with the cutouts open, vs running it out the back stock exhaust
1st run cutouts closed 342hp/358tq
2nd run cutouts opened 347hp/364tq
3rd run cutouts opened 348hp/365tq
also guys any other input is welcome.
Last edited by camcamaro1991; 02-02-2008 at 06:56 PM.
#11
Banned
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As long as the numbers are SAE corrected, then it should be an accurate reflection of the power being put down. Mustang dynos tend to dyno lower numbers than Dynojets, Ill give you that, but the dynapack is a load dyno and it is about on par with the dynojet with the measurements of power while using SAE correction.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the only reason why mustang dynos show a "lower" number is because of the way they measure the output... the Mustang dynos are the only ones that use a eddie current style measurement unit. But your argument is invalid. If he went on a true load style dyno like a Dynapack, then he would have had very similar power numbers measured.
To the OP, congrats on the numbers, they are very respectable and accurate.