Shift time(sec) Vs %TPS Vs Shift Table
04-06-2008, 07:57 PM
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
If you zero the shift-time tables you will disable adaptive pressure
learning and just work from the pressure tables. Better for shift
consistency in my book. But if you set the learn-time targets to
get the shift crispness you like and look at what was the line %
commanded, that can be informative before you shut it off. The
PCM tried to find the right answer for you. It just gets stupid when
the weather changes and changes back, like.
Assuming the LT1 is anything like LS1 trans control anyway.
learning and just work from the pressure tables. Better for shift
consistency in my book. But if you set the learn-time targets to
get the shift crispness you like and look at what was the line %
commanded, that can be informative before you shut it off. The
PCM tried to find the right answer for you. It just gets stupid when
the weather changes and changes back, like.
Assuming the LT1 is anything like LS1 trans control anyway.
04-06-2008, 08:40 PM
#3
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mims, Florida
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lt170chevelle: I use Tunercat on my 3rd gen camaro. I think that you should post over on thirdgen.org (if you haven't already). There are many guys there who tune with Tunercat and are very proficient. I may be wrong, but I think that yu are running MAP only. The connection with 3rdgen is that the last 3 years of the 3rd gen Fbodies were MAP only (speed density).
