Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

A BULLIT got SHOT!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2008, 11:42 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
nickate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default A BULLIT got SHOT!!!

On the way home from work last night I got a short run in with a new one...

He wanted to go from a 1st gear roll... (Bad for me as I'm around 400whp)

So we go-- as always I have 0 traction so I pull 2. Now lotsa smoke but no forward movement for me...

I'm surprised as he STILL hasn't come around me yet...
About 50 I get traction by pedaling but the race is way over...

He drives up and says when he saw I was having a hard time staying in my lane he let up..

lol...

Anybody else notice how SKINNY those Mustang tires are???

Typical mods for 400whp M6 car.... Z/28 2000.
Old 10-04-2008, 12:19 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
GR8GAME's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What variation of typical mods?

Did he have anything done?
Old 10-04-2008, 07:05 PM
  #3  
Moderator
iTrader: (15)
 
JayplaySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, OH
Posts: 4,616
Received 161 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Exciting.

400whp should be no match for a Bullit.

You need some drag radials.
Old 10-04-2008, 08:00 PM
  #4  
Launching!
 
Silvrshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WOW you beat a 315 flywheell HP!
Old 10-04-2008, 08:41 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
 
mrbigjeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

lol and he was probably stock. or minimally modded.

nice run though i suppose
Old 10-04-2008, 10:51 PM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
nickate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silvrshark
WOW you beat a 315 flywheell HP!

I don't know where you got the term "flywheel horsepower" but you better google it and find out what it means!
The 60's are over, scooter.

We are in the age of SAE NET ratings and have been since 1971.

I'm old.


Yeah... That's what I was thinking too...

But HE was thinking he was gonna win!!!!

I haven't washed it since I've owned it (over a year now but it's never seen rain or winter--- just dusty.)
it's Black with chrome stock 16" wheels and
I got a stock muffler and tips so it's a pretty stealth look...

224 cam etc... I can't afford to break the rearend so I won't put a tire on it!
It's a lot more fun for me as I enjoy drifting lol!

Last edited by nickate; 10-04-2008 at 10:59 PM.
Old 10-05-2008, 01:49 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
speedshifterNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 575
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

nice kill on yet another version of the new turd mustang
Old 10-06-2008, 12:57 AM
  #8  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nickate
On the way home from work last night I got a short run in with a new one...

He wanted to go from a 1st gear roll... (Bad for me as I'm around 400whp)

So we go-- as always I have 0 traction so I pull 2. Now lotsa smoke but no forward movement for me...

I'm surprised as he STILL hasn't come around me yet...
About 50 I get traction by pedaling but the race is way over...

He drives up and says when he saw I was having a hard time staying in my lane he let up..

lol...

Anybody else notice how SKINNY those Mustang tires are???

Typical mods for 400whp M6 car.... Z/28 2000.
Good kill, he had absolutely no chance and hell and I'm sure he knew that. They come with 235-width tires all around, I do believe.
Originally Posted by speedshifterNC
nice kill on yet another version of the new turd mustang
The OP's car would have butt-raped a stock C5/LS1 F-body as well, so I wouldn't be so quick to throw the "turd" card.
Old 10-06-2008, 01:11 AM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
odarabla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In Uranus!
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Good kill, he had absolutely no chance and hell and I'm sure he knew that. They come with 235-width tires all around, I do believe.

The OP's car would have butt-raped a stock C5/LS1 F-body as well, so I wouldn't be so quick to throw the "turd" card.
HAHAHAH You just screwed up!! Where's the proof?
Old 10-06-2008, 01:16 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nickate
I don't know where you got the term "flywheel horsepower" but you better google it and find out what it means!
The 60's are over, scooter.

We are in the age of SAE NET ratings and have been since 1971.

I'm old.
You are talking about the differences between SAE Gross HP and SAE Net HP. The switch was in 1972 and both are measured at the crank, with the flywheel in place for both tests. The difference is gross used no accessories, and headers in some cases. Net used accessories, emission control equipment in place and the factory exhaust. Since 2005 SAE certified HP testing has been in place but it remains voluntary, GM does utilize it at least for high HP tests. Flywheel HP is still a valid term.
Old 10-06-2008, 01:17 AM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
odarabla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In Uranus!
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Good kill, he had absolutely no chance and hell and I'm sure he knew that. They come with 235-width tires all around, I do believe.

The OP's car would have butt-raped a stock C5/LS1 F-body as well, so I wouldn't be so quick to throw the "turd" card.
I think the turd comment was on par!! And at most it would be a good race for a stock f-body but no match for a stock C5!!

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/.../handling.html
Old 10-06-2008, 01:49 AM
  #12  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So his 400rwhp F-body wouldn't beat a stock C5 Vette? Because that's what I was talking about. Read comprehension > you . And a C5 vs. an LS1 C5 is a toss-up. But yes, a well-driven Bullitt would be a decent race for either.
Old 10-06-2008, 01:57 AM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Swift_01_z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another pissing contest between mustangs and f-body owners. Oh well, good kill.
Old 10-06-2008, 03:25 AM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
odarabla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In Uranus!
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
So his 400rwhp F-body wouldn't beat a stock C5 Vette? Because that's what I was talking about. Read comprehension > you . And a C5 vs. an LS1 C5 is a toss-up. But yes, a well-driven Bullitt would be a decent race for either.
I am man enough to admitt when I was wrong!! I misread your comment and I apologize. But I still vote because you are a blue blood loving fool!!
Old 10-06-2008, 09:09 AM
  #15  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Swift_01_z-28
Another pissing contest between mustangs and f-body owners. Oh well, good kill.
Can you read? It was a simple mis-read by odarabla... no "pissing contest." Unless of course you make it into one
Old 10-06-2008, 12:24 PM
  #16  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
nickate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Manalishi
You are talking about the differences between SAE Gross HP and SAE Net HP. The switch was in 1972 and both are measured at the crank, with the flywheel in place for both tests. The difference is gross used no accessories, and headers in some cases. Net used accessories, emission control equipment in place and the factory exhaust. Since 2005 SAE certified HP testing has been in place but it remains voluntary, GM does utilize it at least for high HP tests. Flywheel HP is still a valid term.
My bad... I thought it was '71 'cause that's when all the HP#s took a dive (That is when the compression drop into the 8's for most motors happened too)

My good friend has a 1970 LS6 Chevelle he races in FAST certified stock.
(No deviation from OEM for duration lift overlap etc...)

His car is rated @ 450hp (454 cid) and weighs 36-3700 lbs.
he goes 112-113mph.

My car weighs 3480 and I've only ran it 2x... 114mph (bad DA) 116mph (better da)

We think they'd be a good race as they're both about the same power...
Old 10-06-2008, 12:58 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nickate
My bad... I thought it was '71 'cause that's when all the HP#s took a dive (That is when the compression drop into the 8's for most motors happened too)
there were drops in 71 due to changes in emissions regulations
Old 10-06-2008, 12:58 PM
  #18  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
RED94Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Peoria Illinois
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
So his 400rwhp F-body wouldn't beat a stock C5 Vette? Because that's what I was talking about. Read comprehension > you . And a C5 vs. an LS1 C5 is a toss-up. But yes, a well-driven Bullitt would be a decent race for either.
A bullitt a good race with a c5 vette quit inhaling paint man
Old 10-06-2008, 05:20 PM
  #19  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
nickate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RED94Z28
A bullitt a good race with a c5 vette quit inhaling paint man
...OFF A CLIFF!!!
Old 10-06-2008, 05:32 PM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

YOu guys are funny.

Nice Kill OP.

And yes...they have skinnier tires than the 99-04s with MORE HP and TQ>....then again, they are better tires than teh old CRAPBACK goodyears.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.