LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

Why did the LS4 have to go away?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2010, 02:26 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Super LaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why did the LS4 have to go away?

I was wondering why the 2009 Chevy Impala SS was the last year for the LS4.

The Impala soldiers on pretty much unchanged into 2011 until it gets redone. Did the market not justify it's existence? Did the downturn in the economy coupled with a sour taste for ANY GM product lead to its demise?

If you think about it, a 303 HP V8 is not really that competitive when you see V6's with 312 and up as commonplace and I'm not even including the VQ's that are in Nissans and Infintis. One thing the V6 engines do lack is torque and that's what gets it done at the end of the day.
Old 11-22-2010, 02:46 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
JP_GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Almost Arkansas, LA
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It lasted a year less than the LS1 right? '97-'02 and '05-'09. The death of the Grand Prix and the birth of the G8 didn't help nor did the woes of GM. It was also a niche interest engine, how many people actually know it exists?
Old 11-22-2010, 08:12 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
 
MC06SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pleasantville, Ohio
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The government killed it and most other "sensible" performance cars when they took over GM
Old 11-22-2010, 08:22 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
D J Real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Clinton Twp. MI
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MC06SS
The government killed it and most other "sensible" performance cars when they took over GM
actually the government didn't kill it specifically, it just didn't allow it in passenger cars anymore due to it's fuel consumption. The engine is still alive in the G.M. pickup truck models.
Old 11-22-2010, 08:55 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
JP_GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Almost Arkansas, LA
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5.3L truck engines are not LS4s, it was an LSx strictly built for transverse applications.
Old 11-22-2010, 09:14 PM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
D J Real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Clinton Twp. MI
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JP_GXP
5.3L truck engines are not LS4s, it was an LSx strictly built for transverse applications.
o really, hmmm I stand corrected. Thank you sir.
Old 11-22-2010, 09:26 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
JP_GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Almost Arkansas, LA
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quite welcome. I think one of the truck engines is LSx derived but not an official LSx monikered engine.
Old 11-22-2010, 10:46 PM
  #8  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Super LaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is the truck 5.3 aluminum or still an iron block?
Old 11-22-2010, 10:57 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
 
Red03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The LH8 (LH6?) 5.3L in the Colorado/Canyon is all aluminum, if I'm not mistaken. The 5.3L used in the GMT platform is iron block/aluminum heads.
Old 11-23-2010, 12:34 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
vroom_vroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: vegas
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

when the government steps in and has control of a company sh#t gets jacked up
Old 11-23-2010, 12:37 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
vroom_vroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: vegas
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by JP_GXP
5.3L truck engines are not LS4s, it was an LSx strictly built for transverse applications.
-untill you drop one in a g body cutlass
Old 11-23-2010, 01:08 AM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
LS1 Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 78°14′46″N 15°27′56″E
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Super LaX
Is the truck 5.3 aluminum or still an iron block?
Originally Posted by Red03GT
The LH8 (LH6?) 5.3L in the Colorado/Canyon is all aluminum, if I'm not mistaken. The 5.3L used in the GMT platform is iron block/aluminum heads.
Actually, it depends on what you buy.

Silverado and Sierras all get iron block/aluminum head 5.3s.
Two wheel-drive Tahoes and Yukons get all aluminum 5.3s.
Four wheel-drive Tahoes and Yukons get the iron block/aluminum head combo.
Old 11-23-2010, 03:53 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
RickAKATed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Highland, IN
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why keep it when they can make a more fuel efficient V6 that makes the same amount of power. It doesn't make sense.
Old 11-23-2010, 06:14 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
JP_GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Almost Arkansas, LA
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The sound...
Old 11-23-2010, 06:39 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Brian396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ottawa IL
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

torque
Old 11-23-2010, 08:13 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
MC06SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pleasantville, Ohio
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

was the Aluminum 5.3 in the SSR an LS4?? or was it based on the Truck engine?It made about the same Hp and torque??
Old 11-23-2010, 08:41 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
JP_GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Almost Arkansas, LA
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It was a 5.3L Vortec in '03 and '04 and an LS2 in '05 and '06. See my previous statement about the LS4.
Old 11-23-2010, 09:42 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Mels SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Orleans La
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They should have kept it a V8 that gets close to 30MPG Big Mistake Huge!!

Last edited by Mels SS; 11-24-2010 at 09:30 AM.
Old 11-23-2010, 10:32 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
JP_GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Almost Arkansas, LA
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine's getting 20 atm, spirited, TapShift only driving with DoD disabled and winter blend gas... I was seeing high 20s on all 8 cylinders...
Old 11-24-2010, 12:23 AM
  #20  
TECH Regular
 
Red03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Cruising at 80 from NorCal to SoCal I got 26 mpg. I got 27 mpg cruise set at 73. Peddling it myself between 62-69 depending on the slope of the road I got 29 mpg.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.