LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Ran my 95 Firehawk tonight at Atco

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2010, 10:27 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
1998silverbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Ran my 95 Firehawk tonight at Atco

Well just got back from Atco.. Made 4 passes in the 95 Firehawk..

1st pass

60': 2.08
1/8: 8.9 @ 80mph
1/4: 13.830@100.09mph.

2nd pass

60' 1.999
1/8:8.775@80.12mph
1/4: 13.707@ 100.07mph

3rd pass

60': 2.458
1/8: 9.433@ 79.52
1/4: 14.38@99.8

4th pass

60': 1.993
1/8: 8.750@ 80.32
1/4: 13.663@ 100.51mph

I was pretty shocked on how strong the car ran. It has the Firehawk mods like the Catback and Ramair. The only other mods are MSD Blaster Coil, Airfoil, and 3200 Revmaxx Stall. The car was on Street tires with 32lbs of air in them.

I plan on some 3.73's, Headers, and a Drag Radial tire and might be able to hit 12's with that! What does everyone think mod wise? Not looking to do Heads and cam except for maybe a LT4 cam and its a Firehawk so I dont want to get crazy with it. Just want a nice 12 second car..
Old 11-02-2010, 10:50 PM
  #2  
LT1
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,619
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Good times, with better 60' i think you would be quicker.

You should be able to do 12's with just bolt-on's.
Old 11-02-2010, 11:00 PM
  #3  
Teching In
 
Sleeper Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sweet times. Car runs strong!
Old 11-03-2010, 06:16 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Great times! Atco had some marvelous DA last night.
Old 11-03-2010, 07:09 AM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
~BuMps AloT~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hays
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Get your 60ft down and that thing will shine!
Old 11-03-2010, 07:40 AM
  #6  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
1998silverbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks everyone. The car caught me off gaurd. I was not expecting the car to run that strong. Went to the tracking hoping for a 13.9..
Old 11-03-2010, 10:22 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
trilkb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Received 77 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

im running almost exactly the same times in my trans am with almost the same mods minus my nitto drag radials and the ignition mods, i have LS1 lid instead of ram air. Funny, your cutting better 60's on your street tires then i am on drags. i hate nittos!!!!


nice times man!
Old 11-03-2010, 11:44 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
DVS LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 1998silverbird
The car was on Street tires with 32lbs of air in them
Too much tire pressure imo. I've never run over 28 psi in any of my street tires. Not sure where ATCO is (somewhere south? lol). Up here its been cold lately and my firestone Firehawk SZ50EP tires are like plastic - i've been driving with the rears at 22-24psi just to get around town (even on freeway drives). These tires are garbage to begin with so I don't care if they wear funny, etc.

I remember years ago somebody told me a trick about staggering the psi between the driver and passenger side rear tires... I can't recall exactly but one of the rear tires tends to get more power than the other simply due to the revolution of the engine/drive train and how its transfered through the differential. Anyways, I think the idea was to give the rear tire that gets more power, more grip by lowering that tires psi more than the opposite. I "think" its the rear passenger tire that receives more power, so you'd keep that tire 2+ psi lower than the driver side rear. I THINK

Anyways, I still think 32psi at the strip is a lot. Try 28 next time and work your way down. Although with street tires I realise there's only so much benefit you will squeeze out.

not bad times at all for a more or less stock LT1 firehawk. The converter is the bigger helper - were you getting any wheelspin on your launches? (i'd imagine YES). Also, exactly what type and size street tire are you running?
Old 11-03-2010, 12:55 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
1998silverbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by trilkb
im running almost exactly the same times in my trans am with almost the same mods minus my nitto drag radials and the ignition mods, i have LS1 lid instead of ram air. Funny, your cutting better 60's on your street tires then i am on drags. i hate nittos!!!!


nice times man!

Thanks.. Your stall is also a 3500. Ours is a 3200. dont know what differance that makes.

Originally Posted by DVS LT1
Too much tire pressure imo. I've never run over 28 psi in any of my street tires. Not sure where ATCO is (somewhere south? lol). Up here its been cold lately and my firestone Firehawk SZ50EP tires are like plastic - i've been driving with the rears at 22-24psi just to get around town (even on freeway drives). These tires are garbage to begin with so I don't care if they wear funny, etc.

I remember years ago somebody told me a trick about staggering the psi between the driver and passenger side rear tires... I can't recall exactly but one of the rear tires tends to get more power than the other simply due to the revolution of the engine/drive train and how its transfered through the differential. Anyways, I think the idea was to give the rear tire that gets more power, more grip by lowering that tires psi more than the opposite. I "think" its the rear passenger tire that receives more power, so you'd keep that tire 2+ psi lower than the driver side rear. I THINK

Anyways, I still think 32psi at the strip is a lot. Try 28 next time and work your way down. Although with street tires I realise there's only so much benefit you will squeeze out.

not bad times at all for a more or less stock LT1 firehawk. The converter is the bigger helper - were you getting any wheelspin on your launches? (i'd imagine YES). Also, exactly what type and size street tire are you running?
275-40-17's are the tire size. I think they are Yokohama tires. Dont know for sure and the car is in my storage unit. Atco is in South NJ. It was in the 40's last night. I am sure the car was wheel spinning as well.
Old 11-03-2010, 07:02 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hawk584's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,749
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

look'n good! that's right where mine was at stock!
Old 11-03-2010, 07:03 PM
  #11  
Man-Crush Warning
iTrader: (1)
 
Shownomercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,150
Received 119 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

Looks pretty slow, better swap an LS1 in. vastly cheaper.
Old 11-03-2010, 07:51 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hawk584's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,749
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

^ can i punch you in the face? don't listen to the troll fellow Firehawk brother... them times are respectable for a nearly bone stock '95 Firehawk
Old 11-03-2010, 08:04 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
trilkb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Received 77 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

got people telling you to get your 60 down too...1.9's on street tires is probably better then they can pull. I cant do it on nittos half the time im around a 2.015.

Your doin good!
Old 11-03-2010, 08:44 PM
  #14  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
1998silverbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Shownomercy
Looks pretty slow, better swap an LS1 in. vastly cheaper.
I was thinking about it before I went to the track last night. Believe me I was very surprised about what the car ran.
Old 11-03-2010, 08:57 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
1961ba427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shownomercy
Looks pretty slow, better swap an LS1 in. vastly cheaper.
From his signature the OP obviously knows what to expect from a bolt-on LS1, which admittedly is quicker than his LT1 car (probably had more bolt-ons too I bet) .....but the costs involved are huge for a swap compared to him keeping the LT1 and making it even better.
Old 11-03-2010, 09:08 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hawk584's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,749
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1961ba427
From his signature the OP obviously knows what to expect from a bolt-on LS1, which admittedly is quicker than his LT1 car (probably had more bolt-ons too I bet) .....but the costs involved are huge for a swap compared to him keeping the LT1 and making it even better.

lets not forget it's not just any joeblow formula...IT'S A FIREHAWK
Old 11-03-2010, 09:18 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
1961ba427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

x2 for not messing up a real LT1 Firehawk with an LS1 conversion. As much as I like the LS1 lid conversions people are gaining 1-2 tenths with, I won't consider cutting the radiator support of my SS. My gf's 95 Z28 will be going under the knife for that mod though.

Besides the rarity of the Firehawk, swapping in an LS1 just isn't "vastly cheaper" like he said. (If you think I'm wrong, prove it with prices, part numbers, etc.) I already have a running 36K mile LS2 out of an 06 GTO sitting in a crate that's factory rated at 400HP/400TQ. I thought about swapping it into an LT1 car, but after checking into everything required it would cost more to swap it in to gain what......40-50 rwhp maybe?.....than to build up the LT1....AND THAT'S NOT INCLUDING THE COST OF THE LS2 I already had. (Caps for emphasis, not yelling.) The LS2 will be wearing a victor jr, L92 heads, 750 Holley, and a stout HR and residing in an older chevy in the future instead.
Old 11-03-2010, 09:26 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
1961ba427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wasn't trying to lead the thread off topic, it just was annoying that someone suggested an LS swap for your car as vastly cheaper. Seems that alot of LS guys like to come into the LT forum and try to act all superior and often just prove they don't really know jack. I'm not an LS1 hater at all. I think it's a great platform with definate advantages (thus any idiot can run well with one.) But that doesn't mean the LT1 is "ancient" or dead technology.

Congratulations on your times OP with what is essentially a stock car still. The only real mod is the stall, and since you ran on true street tires, it may have hurt as much as it helped. I bet with some traction you will drop a couple tenths without any other mods.
Old 11-03-2010, 09:37 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hawk584's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,749
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

and saying it looked slow where in reality those times are right on par with a factory SLP Firehawk and an assumed non-professional race car driver. his #599 in White w/ red leather is 1of 20 crazy rare &, not everyone knows what a Firehawk is


edit! edit! edit! (http://firehawkowners.com/gallery/v/firehawk/1995/0599)
why do you have a t/a bumper on your '95 Formula Firehawk?

Last edited by hawk584; 11-03-2010 at 09:53 PM.
Old 11-03-2010, 09:54 PM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

LPE makes a baby cam thats a bit bigger than the Lt4 and alot better


Also has a factory like idle

The classic small crane cam is also a nice choice

Theirs also a few other options out there


I really wouldn't waste my time messing with a strand lt4 cam


Quick Reply: Ran my 95 Firehawk tonight at Atco



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.