LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

who would win?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2014, 08:28 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
transam_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: kc,MO
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default who would win?

Kid at my school with a 97 mustang gt. His buddy said he only has exhaust and aftermarket clutch. I got a 95 trans am with no smog pump, egr, or cats. I think I could take him, but what do you guys think?
Old 11-06-2014, 08:40 PM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Jaxem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A stock(ish) F-body will walk all over a stock(ish) mustang all day long, that's what they were built for. Granted you have the lowest rated motor in the 4th gens, but it still shouldn't be a problem. Is your car an auto or standard?
Old 11-06-2014, 08:42 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
 
98CayenneT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: White Bear, Mn
Posts: 3,903
Received 357 Likes on 248 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

You will absolutely murder him, he would probably run 14.7- 15.1 in the quarter mile
you could run anywhere from 13.8-14.1
those are just average times for those cars but your car is generally a full second faster in the quarter mile stock for stock which is a lot
Old 11-06-2014, 09:33 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
 
hrcslam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 2,610
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

It'll be a whoopin. Hell the 1998+ Pontiac Grand Prix GTP's handle those Mustang GT's with ease.
Old 11-06-2014, 09:37 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
transam_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: kc,MO
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats what I thought, now I might have to put some $$ on it
Old 11-06-2014, 11:19 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Catmaigne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Conshohocken, PA
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Jaxem
Granted you have the lowest rated motor in the 4th gens, but it still shouldn't be a problem.
THEM'S FIGHTIN' WORDS!!!!!!!!!!!

I didn't know he had a 3.4
Old 11-07-2014, 01:07 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Cajun ELESS-ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Thibodaux LA
Posts: 675
Received 65 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jaxem
A stock(ish) F-body will walk all over a stock(ish) mustang all day long, that's what they were built for. Granted you have the lowest rated motor in the 4th gens, but it still shouldn't be a problem. Is your car an auto or standard?
???? how does he have the lowest rated motor?? i thought the hp from 93-97 lt1 was basically the same. pls explain
Old 11-07-2014, 01:13 AM
  #8  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (24)
 
smokenssz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bastop,TEXAS
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Maybe he's refering to the ls1 hp vs lt1 hp?
Old 11-07-2014, 07:34 AM
  #9  
Launching!
 
cuisinartvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Valencia Ca
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Why dont you just run him and find out?
Make sure you have your driving down first
Old 11-07-2014, 08:26 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
 
hrcslam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 2,610
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

92-95 LT1- 275hp (single cat OBD1)
96-97 LT1- 285hp (dual cat OBD2)
97 LT4 - 330hp
98-00 LS1- 305-320hp
01-02 LS1 310-325hp (revised air intake, lid)
Old 11-07-2014, 10:11 AM
  #11  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Jaxem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Catmaigne
THEM'S FIGHTIN' WORDS!!!!!!!!!!!

I didn't know he had a 3.4
Lol, not the 3.4, but the 275 HP LT1 instead of a 285 or 300 horse version. It was a sympathetic remark though, I have a 95 too
Old 11-07-2014, 10:34 AM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
bufmatmuslepants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hampstead, NC
Posts: 3,266
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

The 275, 285 and 300hp versions were the same motor, put a CAI and log tubes on any of them and they are the same. I highly doubt even stock there is ANY difference in power. If you don't crush him you suck at driving.
Old 11-07-2014, 10:39 AM
  #13  
Launching!
 
ChevyOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hrcslam
92-95 LT1- 275hp (single cat OBD1)
96-97 LT1- 285hp (dual cat OBD2)
97 LT4 - 330hp
98-00 LS1- 305-320hp
01-02 LS1 310-325hp (revised air intake, lid)
I know this is for an F-Body, but for curiosity what about a 93 with dual cats?
Old 11-07-2014, 07:34 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
 
hrcslam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 2,610
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChevyOwner
I know this is for an F-Body, but for curiosity what about a 93 with dual cats?
Corvette's were rated higher. In 1993 the Corvette LT1 is factory rated at 300hp.

The only difference between the F-Body and Y-Body LT1 was the exhaust (dual for the Vette) and intake tubing. They underrated the F-Body for marketing purposes.

The actual horsepower difference from the exhaust and intake tubing is less than advertised. Probably 15hp max. Looking at dyno runs, you'll see the Vette's will lay down about 275-280 (M6 w/ exhaust, tune, and CAI mods) vs the F-bodies 260-275 (M6 w/ exhaust, tune, and CAI mods).

Last edited by hrcslam; 11-09-2014 at 08:49 AM.



Quick Reply: who would win?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM.