LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

1996 Fireturd/LT1 Torque Converter Choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2016, 11:58 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
andrewdains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1996 Fireturd/LT1 Torque Converter Choice

Hey all, Im working on a 96 Firebird Formula, I pulled a motor from a 96 Roadmaster, and have cleaned it up but not rebuild it. I put a Comp Cams Hydraulic Roller Tappet, Duration 260/270, Lift .560/.555, Grind 260XFIHR13. 1.6 rockers and new rods/lifters. I have the 4L60e trans out of the firebird and I have a TCI shift kit and boost valve to install. Long tube headers are on the list. Im still planning on using the stock rear end, 3.42 gears. My question is what torque converter should I run? Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks
Andrew
Old 01-04-2016, 07:24 AM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Why get this far in before asking questions?
You know the iron heads won't accommodate .550 lift without machining right?

On stall since mild and cheap seems to be the criteria I would it use an Edge Racing converter in the 28-3200 stall range 9.5", not a 12"
Old 01-04-2016, 09:46 AM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
andrewdains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im working on this as a hobby and I only know enough to be dangerous. This is the biggest project Ive taken on. Everything I've read about the cam never said anything about machining the heads for .550 lift, I did install new bee hive springs from comp as well. What is the difference between all the sizes of torque converter, ie why is a 9.5 better than a 12?
Old 01-04-2016, 11:51 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

The iron heads are different than the aluminum, only accept something like .535ish lift reliably without checking retainer to seal clearance.

On stall once you get over 2500 or so a 9.5" converter is more efficient. And they are a lot lighter.
Stock cam engines benefit from 32-3400 stall.
Old 01-04-2016, 11:59 AM
  #5  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
revolutions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Iron LT1 heads have pressed in studs and they can pull out when subjected to higher lifts.
A 9.5 is lighter, less likely to balloon/distort under high pressure, typically will be more efficient and have a higher torque multiplication factor.
Generally speaking you want to run the smallest diameter converter that will handle the power level you are at and achieve the desired stall speed.

Last edited by revolutions; 01-04-2016 at 12:21 PM.
Old 01-04-2016, 05:41 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

With beehives there is unlikely enough to be enough pressure to pull a stud, but the lift is a real problem, maybe use 1.5s?
Old 01-04-2016, 09:13 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
andrewdains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I do still have the original motor from the firebird, would I be able to swap my valve train parts over to the aluminum heads and still be ok or am I up a creek with this cam/head combo? I have a machine shop close by, but i'm trying to get by without a huge bill.
Old 01-05-2016, 03:58 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 131 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by revolutions
Iron LT1 heads have pressed in studs and they can pull out when subjected to higher lifts.....
If you can cite a case where a iron-head LT1 pulled out its studs, I'd like to see it.

In the B-Body community, we've talked about studs being pulled out for years....but no one have ever cited a single case.

KW
Old 01-05-2016, 07:17 PM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
 
BALLSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,934
Received 98 Likes on 89 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

OP

that XFI cam published specs on lift is with 1:6 RR (most cams are spec at 1.5 lift RR). Your Comp 465 cam with 1:6 RR has lift of .560/.555. With 1:5 RR it would have .525/.520

if you went with 1:5 RR your intake lift would be .525...which is under the .535 Caprice notes that "may" be a problem if higher than .535 on iron heads

with the iron heads you need to be careful with to much lift either causing retainer to valve stem seal clearance issues or on spring pressure. Since the iron heads have pressed in studs vs screw in studs some feel to much lift or spring pressure may cause the rocker stud to pull out or raise slightly which will puke your spring pressure. I have not personally seen this happen, only "read" it did on a iron head motor .

Back when these LT1 motors were new many did the Crane 227 cam with iron heads but used 1:5 RR on the exhaust side to keep the lift down. They used 1:6 on intake side. I remember people selling 1/2 sets of 1:6/1:5 RR when they did that cam on iron heads

on the bee hive springs...I know the XFI cam specs them. Mine lasted 20k mi before failure so you need to pull them and check spring pressure and for signs of cracking. Even then, as I did, you don't know if they will fail say for example checking them at 10-15k mi where they check out fine visually and on a spring pressure check...then at 20k mi you find you have a 2 piece spring. The XFI has fairly aggressive lobes vs other cam grinds. The 465 you have is the mildest (in terms of lift) of the XFI grinds offered. I suspect keeping revs under 6200 (that cam will be way done making power before that) you would really not have a problem. Rotate motor by hand and watch retainer to valve stem seal clearance. Your iron heads take a 1.75 installed spring. The bee hive spec at 1.800" installed height. You will have slightly more seat and open spring pressure with them installed at 1.7x" height than what their published specs are. Not really a big deal until your cam lift gets close to what the spring lift can accommodate.
Old 01-05-2016, 07:38 PM
  #10  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
revolutions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KW Baraka
If you can cite a case where a iron-head LT1 pulled out its studs, I'd like to see it.

In the B-Body community, we've talked about studs being pulled out for years....but no one have ever cited a single case.

KW
I can't say I have ever heard of it happening on an LT specifically but it has happened on many occasions with gen 1 heads.
I wouldn't think there is any difference since I have seen reports of it happening on vortec heads which are from the same time frame
and should be of equal quality.
Old 01-06-2016, 06:26 AM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Give the guys at Circle D a call. Top notch customer service.
Old 01-06-2016, 10:49 AM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
andrewdains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you all for the information! Im going to have the aluminum heads cleaned up and swap everything over to them. I found a set of 1.52 Comp Cams RR that I think I'll use instead of the 1.6 RR for now.
Old 01-06-2016, 11:44 AM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

1.6s are fine with aluminum heads.
Old 01-06-2016, 12:49 PM
  #14  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
andrewdains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Even with the .550 lift that I have?
Old 01-06-2016, 01:00 PM
  #15  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
BIGsmokey10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: michigan
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yank or circle D
Old 01-06-2016, 06:08 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Keep the 1.6RRs, swap everything to the aluminum heads, then run a ~2800-3200 stall from a reputable manufacturer like FTI, Yank, Edge, Circle D, etc.

That cam on 1.6s is no problem for the aluminum heads, no need to get new rockers.
Old 01-07-2016, 01:10 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 131 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by revolutions
I can't say I have ever heard of it happening on an LT specifically but it has happened on many occasions with gen 1 heads.....
I've only heard of it happening on old (1970's and 1980's) iron heads.....never on LT1 heads.


Originally Posted by andrewdains
.......Im still planning on using the stock rear end, 3.42 gears. My question is what torque converter should I run? Any help would be appreciated......
I have a low-miles Yank SS3600 stall TC.....PM me if interested......

KW
Old 01-07-2016, 01:30 PM
  #18  
TECH Veteran
 
BALLSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,934
Received 98 Likes on 89 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by andrewdains
Thank you all for the information! Im going to have the aluminum heads cleaned up and swap everything over to them. I found a set of 1.52 Comp Cams RR that I think I'll use instead of the 1.6 RR for now.
Originally Posted by andrewdains
Even with the .550 lift that I have?
AL heads 1:6 RR are fine and I would use them. The studs are screw in vs pressed on iron heads.

the .550 lift will be no problem but get better/new springs over the stock LT1 AL head spring.

I use Lunati #73925K5 kit. Got it from LE



Quick Reply: 1996 Fireturd/LT1 Torque Converter Choice



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 AM.