LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Accel SuperRam Base Intake Manifold LT1 Applications

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2007, 06:02 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jakesz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: iowa
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Accel SuperRam Base Intake Manifold LT1 Applications

http://www.lingenfelter.com/store/74197l.html

The SuperRam manifold base was designed by John Lingenfelter in 1990 to increase power on the L98 TPI engine from 1600 RPM to redline. Engineered to boost air velocity and improve the charging effect of the cylinders this combination was unbeatable.

This intake was later redesigned for the LT1 Corvette, Camaro, Firebird and Impala engine packages. This design was a milestone for the LT1 and took advantage of the new improved cylinder head design to make more usable torque than the LT1 or TPI's Mini Ram intake. This intake manifold will increase torque and will make your car faster than a comparable built LT1 or Mini ram equipped vehicle hands down.

Requires 74196 plenum and runners for Corvette applications or 74196F for the Camaro or Firebird LT1 applications. Requires L98 style fuel rails assemblies and required hookups for fuel system.



Is anyone using one of these?
Old 01-30-2007, 06:08 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
87Lt1Monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

haha just took it off, It was absolutly AWSOME.. i matched it with the camshaft from LPE 219 219 525 525. Had it on a 383 LT1 , Heads had bigger valves and a pocket porting thats all. nothing special. Had the whole superram setup, its actully for sale now. It was sweet, now im going toward something more radical. i ran 11.9 on a stock 10 bolt with 3.23 gears and a Th-350 Trans .. Weight at the time was around 3300 lbs. The best part was passing MD emmissions with FLYING colors and the next day unchanged ran 11.9's at 111
Old 01-30-2007, 06:12 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
87Lt1Monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

By the way i have a dynosheet it made 381 Horsepower and 420 FTLBS RWHP!! I have the dynosheet , No scanner though. If your interested shoot me a PM.
Old 01-30-2007, 06:18 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
dsmawd350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lets see soem pics
Old 01-30-2007, 06:20 PM
  #5  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
87Lt1Monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Aww i have no pics right now but when it gets back from bead blasting i will get some for ya.
Old 01-30-2007, 06:20 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Captainofiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

First thing that pops in my head is that I dont think it would fit under the stock hood thought, the TPI system looks way too tall for the 4th gens, It definitley looks cooler though IMO
Old 01-30-2007, 06:28 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
87Lt1Monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That i wouldnt know im a G-Body guy with F-bod GUTS!
Old 01-30-2007, 06:45 PM
  #8  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jakesz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: iowa
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can see how the longer runners would have helped increase torque. what runners did you get the vette or f-body ones?
Old 01-30-2007, 07:09 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
87Lt1Monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow i have NO idea.. how would i know?
Old 01-30-2007, 07:42 PM
  #10  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jakesz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: iowa
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The part numbers are in the link.(if you ordered the lingfelter or accel ones 74196f for the camaro)
http://www.lingenfelter.com/store/74197l.html
Old 01-30-2007, 07:54 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
ABA383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southern PA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I was going to use that manifold matched with the LPE 219/219 .560/.560 cam, but it was a bit too cost prohibitive...I wanted LPE to do all the porting of the manifold to match my combo and the cost just was a bit high...No doubt its a way nasty street intake with gobs of torque without winding the thing to the moon...I saw a dyno test in 1996 and an M6 LPE 383 with the above cam/intake pulled 415rwhp...not bad for a smallish cam, huh?..

--Alan
Old 01-30-2007, 08:17 PM
  #12  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jakesz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: iowa
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ABA383
I was going to use that manifold matched with the LPE 219/219 .560/.560 cam, but it was a bit too cost prohibitive...I wanted LPE to do all the porting of the manifold to match my combo and the cost just was a bit high...No doubt its a way nasty street intake with gobs of torque without winding the thing to the moon...I saw a dyno test in 1996 and an M6 LPE 383 with the above cam/intake pulled 415rwhp...not bad for a smallish cam, huh?..

--Alan

Do you by chance remember the torque? 450ish? maybe
Old 01-30-2007, 08:18 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 87Lt1Monte
By the way i have a dynosheet it made 381 Horsepower and 420 FTLBS RWHP!! I have the dynosheet , No scanner though. If your interested shoot me a PM.
Those dyno #'s don't add up to 111mph traps in a 3300 lb car, I trapped 111mph with an auto with 322rwhp and my tranny was slippin pretty bad (bounced off the limiter before it shifted).
Old 01-30-2007, 08:19 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ABA383
I was going to use that manifold matched with the LPE 219/219 .560/.560 cam, but it was a bit too cost prohibitive...I wanted LPE to do all the porting of the manifold to match my combo and the cost just was a bit high...No doubt its a way nasty street intake with gobs of torque without winding the thing to the moon...I saw a dyno test in 1996 and an M6 LPE 383 with the above cam/intake pulled 415rwhp...not bad for a smallish cam, huh?..

--Alan
What did they quote you for the intake?
Old 01-31-2007, 10:53 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

http://compcams.com/Community/Articl...p?ID=-61543841
I love this intake, I am doing a D1SC blower setup using my LT4 intake but I would love to see what it would do with this Superram. It Will fit without any cutting on an LT1. Another good intake setup would be the Holley Stealthram. My buddy has an LT1 with a Stealthram on it that runs 10.60's N/A.
Last time I check I think they sell the whole kit for around 1400. I have seen the LT1 kit go for 1,000 on ebay with the 1000CFM TB. I 'd throw my Monoblade on it, lol.
Old 01-31-2007, 12:11 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
87Lt1Monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What do you mean it doesnt match up? im guessing because of the diffrence in torque and horsepower is why it looks funny.. with lots of tq and little HP u will have a lower MPH
Old 01-31-2007, 12:21 PM
  #17  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
87Lt1Monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ohh and by the way u dont even have to rev the thing to 5500 i was shifting at like 5200 !
Old 02-01-2007, 06:14 AM
  #18  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jakesz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: iowa
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Did you use aftermarket plunem and runners or stock ones?
Old 02-01-2007, 11:18 AM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
leadfoot4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Webster, NY
Posts: 4,611
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Captainofiron
First thing that pops in my head is that I dont think it would fit under the stock hood thought, the TPI system looks way too tall for the 4th gens, It definitley looks cooler though IMO
For the "infamous" Motor Trend magazine f-body tuner shoot-out back in '94, Lingenfelter sent their killer 4th gen Firebird Formula. It had this intake manifold on a 383 engine, under a stock hood.


For those not familiar, there were cars sent by Hennessey Motorsports, Lingenfelter, Doug Rippe Motorsports, L G Motorsports, Granatelli, and Vortec Superchargers. Only caveat...it had to be street legal, on street tires, and parts/conversions available to the general public. Road course and drag strip testing was conducted.
Old 02-01-2007, 11:59 AM
  #20  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 87Lt1Monte
What do you mean it doesnt match up? im guessing because of the diffrence in torque and horsepower is why it looks funny.. with lots of tq and little HP u will have a lower MPH
You should be trapping alot higher with that power/torque.


Quick Reply: Accel SuperRam Base Intake Manifold LT1 Applications



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.