LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

LS1 Lid conversion Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2007, 02:40 AM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LS1 Lid conversion Dyno

Dyno of LT1 conversion Lid and 85mm maf on my 236/245 Hyd roller cammed 401, thru 12 bolt, and locked auto. New numbers were with under drive pulley removed (went to SFI dampner), and heat range 9 plugs (for 200 shot) vs. heat range 4. New dyno numbers were way lean and I picked up 5tq and 6hp more than this graph thru the whole pull after tuning. 420.65TQ and 460.33HP SAE corrected now. My old numbers were 424.01TQ and 448.15HP SAE. So, I picked up 12 rwhp with this MOD, even after taking away a little with the pulley and plugs (I'm assuming that's were some of my torque went). Numbers Uncorrected were 439.54TQ and 481.00HP. Using this graph to show how my old combo was starving for air upstairs above 6K rpm...Nice gain with a upper rpm that looks more like a mechanical roller than my little HYD (for a 401 cube engine)...HP peak is now at 6425rpms instead of 6275rpms. Good Mod for me but I'm not sure less agressive combos would be worth it...time will tell

[IMG]URL=http://imageshack.us][/URL][/IMG]
Old 02-05-2007, 07:06 AM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

Nice numbers..
This is a 401 CID LT1 in this car?
Old 02-05-2007, 10:21 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yes....Was my old 396 combo, now this year with 60 over pistons (note to people have your blocks sonic checked if going this big), I'v been running this stroker sense 1997 with ZERO problems and hundreds of drag passes over the years + a **** ton of dyno runs

I'm more impressed with the upper rpm band...Not bad for an actual "Daily Driver." 12 1/2inches of vacuum at idle, air and everything else is still on the car + roll bar....20MPG on the freeway. I'm still not sure if this power gain was from the Air Intake Mod or the 85mm MAF. Someone needs to dyno a before and after MOD (with stock MAF) a give us the answer......
Old 02-05-2007, 11:10 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
foggedz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Its nice to see that the LS1 lid made more power, but what was the deal with the old power curve. If the motor was not getting enough air, why did the power bump back up at the end. Could something else have caused the drop, or do you think it was just the intake?
Old 02-05-2007, 11:14 AM
  #5  
Teching In
 
donskii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sweettttt!
Old 02-05-2007, 11:19 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (46)
 
Z284thgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: tulsa ok
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

whats up with those TQ spikes or breaks in the graph
Old 02-05-2007, 11:46 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

Bad signal or connection on one of the clips.
Old 02-05-2007, 12:15 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by foggedz
Its nice to see that the LS1 lid made more power, but what was the deal with the old power curve. If the motor was not getting enough air, why did the power bump back up at the end. Could something else have caused the drop, or do you think it was just the intake?
Good question.....
All my older dynos with this same cam minus the air intake mods had this problem. You could actually feel the power start to go away (not bad though). I been tuning ever sense Beta LT1 edit days and could not get that straight with any timing or fuel adjustment (In fact that is my best dyno upstairs wise). Now it's weird that the Air tract and Maf would fill that area in but all 4 new dynos were all good up in that rpm....This may be a 401 cube problem (air pulsing in the intake manifold or maybe reversion/cam overlap in a certain area, anybodies quess on that one). Maybe Ed Wright or some of the other guys with weird dynos pulls from LT1's might have a better clue.

Oh, yeah...Forgot to mention that I had a GM 847 cam in there at one time and it did the same thing...and made 4-5 rear wheel less. Peaked a little earlier and had a little more drop off in the 6500-7000rpm area.."Good cam imo for an off the shelf grind".....

Yep, the dyno had a problem with lead connector, plus I would break loose the tires during some part of most runs....

Last edited by jimbob; 02-05-2007 at 12:36 PM.
Old 02-05-2007, 12:49 PM
  #9  
Moderator
iTrader: (33)
 
BizZzatch350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 9,787
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Awesome numbers, thats really impresive for an auto/12 bolt car! Keep up the good work Jim
Old 02-05-2007, 02:17 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

That's not an intake restriction past 6K, it looks exactly like my graph did when I was getting valve float from not enough seat pressure, and the only reason you gained power was from the power not dropping off.
Old 02-05-2007, 02:52 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (46)
 
Z284thgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: tulsa ok
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

me personally i would swap that back to the LT1 stuff and redyno


you seemed to lose under 5500 with the new stuff

i would much rather have that back then make that all mighty peak number UNLESS you always have the motor runnin at 6500
Old 02-05-2007, 03:41 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
streetwarrior96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

nice numbers man.. any pics of that LS1 intake
Old 02-05-2007, 06:49 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z284thgen
me personally i would swap that back to the LT1 stuff and redyno


you seemed to lose under 5500 with the new stuff

i would much rather have that back then make that all mighty peak number UNLESS you always have the motor runnin at 6500
The graph I posted was just for a reference, and not the best run. The tq loss was caused by the underdrive pulley and 4 heat range plugs. I believe WS6's site said he gained like 1 hp and 6 or 8ftlbs at the rear with the pulley alone....The graph I have posted was not tuned #2 run...The last run I gained back most of the torque and 6hp more up top even though the manifold was really heat soaked by then (back to back to back type runs)....Also, got to have that SFI pulley to run 10's legally here. Or I would have it on right now... Ellis ran a 1.52 sixty foot first time out last year at this torque range. If anything I'm more worried about shift extension horse power. I might restall the verter to gain more flash stall (4400 now) and extension, say 5500-5600 instead of 5200.

Valve float, here's the story...I use to think that, but could never explain it after using parts that I know work well with certain cam grinds I have chosen (not tooting my horn..but have had 12 years of experience with this combo). Anyway, tried several cam swaps and the upper rpm area always took a dive. I finally tried a very easy on the valves, 847 cam that never had a problem before in the upper rpms on my car (the last cam in my old pre manifold mod .060 over bore). Did the exact same thing, only at a little lower rpm....For reference I run 175 lbs (doesn't colapse the old version comp R's) of seat pressure and 420lbs at .6 lift with titanium retainers, .080 thick wall push rods and Pro Magnum Roller Rockers.....I was still going to try the bee hives springs set up from Bret Bauer, but did this mod first. Actually, I always thought it was the curtain area of the intake valve holding me back (not enough lift or duration), due to loosing a little more rpm with a mild 847 cam (less lift). But did this mod, retuned and bam. Noticed right away it was better in the upper rpm's on the street (This was before changing plugs and pulley). So, I never expected this outcome, as I was only looking to see if I could gain some peak area power. I do have dynos of valve float on my engine from late 1990's when I tried Extreem cams from comp though... not pretty

The whole thing is weird and only expected 4-6 rear wheel horse power from the MAF only (ED Wright gave me some numbers from his way old combo in this horse power range). For right now I'll just go with it and let some of the other math and physics gurus figure it out....
Old 02-05-2007, 07:08 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

A restrictive intake won't cause the power to drop off like that, the car will just be down on power throughout the whole RPM range. Something else was causing that problem, and it was obviously fixed when you re-dyno'd it.
Old 02-05-2007, 07:30 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by streetwarrior96
nice numbers man.. any pics of that LS1 intake
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=jimbob

speed_demon24
Yep, that is what I would have believed if i had not seen it myself. I'm a poster that WILL tell you everthing that happends (no holds bar) good or bad. I think TWOFAST4LV and I have been more then forth coming on what we accomplish or don't.....But thanks for the props::: "Something else was causing that problem, and it was obviously fixed when you re-dyno'd it." After reading my post I figured it was "Not" so, obvious, wish it had been......I will still monitor in case I have to eat those words.....

streetwarrior96
I see you already have something similar on yours.....I hope to justify the time and expense this spring time....Could not make a good run with it last race of the season...Hopefully 11.1-11.2 will be there. Might need some more gearing and stall to take advantage of the upper rpm area now...

Last edited by jimbob; 02-05-2007 at 07:50 PM.
Old 02-05-2007, 08:00 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

Mine is similar to that.
I fixed that problem with the Radiator hose near the ABS there. I put in a little extra piece of metal to make sure that hose wouldn't get rubbed and get a hole in it. It's not in this picture.

Old 02-05-2007, 08:14 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by the_merv
Mine is similar to that.
I fixed that problem with the Radiator hose near the ABS there. I put in a little extra piece of metal to make sure that hose wouldn't get rubbed and get a hole in it. It's not in this picture.

Cool thanks ....I was thinking of something similar but have not got around to it....Need to fix that just in case....don't want to get bit in the *** later....or worse at the drags....

Good job on that Air intake by the way...
Old 02-05-2007, 08:18 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

That **** was a pain in the ***..
I'll try and get a better picture of what I have done with that hose near the ABS. I dropped the Radiator back more than you did though. I have to do a few more mods to the back of the Fan Shroud when I drop my LS motor in it.
Old 02-05-2007, 09:38 PM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
LS1ATEU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: jackson ohio
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimbob
Cool thanks ....I was thinking of something similar but have not got around to it....Need to fix that just in case....don't want to get bit in the *** later....or worse at the drags....

Good job on that Air intake by the way...
nice job, could u you a power gain?
Old 02-05-2007, 09:41 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (54)
 
97Lt1TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

quick question. would the whisper lid work with the conversion?



Quick Reply: LS1 Lid conversion Dyno



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 AM.