Manual Transmission T56 | T5 | MN12 | Clutches | Hydraulics | Shifters

Why "daisy wheel" clutch disks?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2005, 01:40 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Gary Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Why "daisy wheel" clutch disks?

I have searched but can find no explanation of why many high-performance clutches, such as the Spec III, have four or six wing disks. My intuition tells me that a solid disk would always be superior because of greater contact area. What are the advantages of "daisy wheel" clutch disks?

Last edited by Gary Z; 08-23-2005 at 02:01 PM.
Old 08-23-2005, 02:02 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You know thats never crossed my mind untill now.
Old 08-23-2005, 04:45 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Maybe less surface area allows it to bite harder due to higher clamping force per sq. inch.??
Old 08-23-2005, 05:50 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
SPEEDYws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've always been under the impression that with so much better friction materials the greater surface area is not required and thus making things so much easier to disapate heat.
Old 08-24-2005, 09:51 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
Maybe less surface area allows it to bite harder due to higher clamping force per sq. inch.??

I think that this is the reason as well!
Old 08-24-2005, 10:26 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
STRIPSTAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phila, Pennsyltucky
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think its better friction materials and the need to keep the weight down.
Old 08-24-2005, 02:31 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It seems like they would be able to use a less aggressive friction material if they increased the surface area of it.
Old 08-24-2005, 05:50 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
P Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
Maybe less surface area allows it to bite harder due to higher clamping force per sq. inch.??
It would have more force/area, but that wouldn't help it hold more torque. How much torque it can handle has to do with friction material, radius, and total clamping force. I bet the reason is just because it's easier/cheaper to manufacture small pads of friction material than a big grooved ring. It sure as hell isn't for longer clutch life.
Old 08-24-2005, 06:52 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Haha, can't we get some clutch engineers in here? I understand a larger surface area would be better for clutch life, but mabye the aftermarket material needs more force/less area to work properly? beuller, beuller? anyone?
Old 08-25-2005, 12:57 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Gary Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I had assumed that there was some simple rationale behind the design of daisy wheel clutch discs. If the design depends on unusual properties of special friction materials then we might not get a clear explanation for the simple reason that very few have the knowledge.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.