this is sad 1/4 time
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is sad 1/4 time
ok here it is 15.6xx
1hr 20 min drive. alt was dieing, O2 causing SES light that shut off as soon as I left the track. new tires that didn't hook. and 4000+ elevation.
1) ordered a casper from someone on here.
2) working on a set of rims to put slicks on need a size that will fit my Z28
3) going to camp near the track (20+min)
4) elevation cant do anything
5)02 got me dumb founded put on new bout 2000 mi ago
1hr 20 min drive. alt was dieing, O2 causing SES light that shut off as soon as I left the track. new tires that didn't hook. and 4000+ elevation.
1) ordered a casper from someone on here.
2) working on a set of rims to put slicks on need a size that will fit my Z28
3) going to camp near the track (20+min)
4) elevation cant do anything
5)02 got me dumb founded put on new bout 2000 mi ago
Trending Topics
#8
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bourbonnais IL
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow. i took my car to the track sunday and spun goin into 2nd and pedaled it and ran 13.90. as i spun i bounced the limiter and either bent a pushrod or collapsed a lifter i expected much worse with 211,000 on the clock lol
#9
Old Drag Racer
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Outer Banks of NC
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm lazy. What does that correct to at sea level? I'm sure it still isn't all that fast but now you've got a baseline run that will be easy to better. Just looking for a silver lining here.
BTW, wanna race my 1.3 liter Swift??? j/k
BTW, wanna race my 1.3 liter Swift??? j/k
#11
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
alt has been replaced by a new 150 and Casper on the way.
#15
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
I don't think the drive matters man. I drove there and immediatley did a run pulling a 13.7 @ 104mph with a 2.2 60' ft. Then I parked my car for a couple hours with the hood open and let it cool off. Did a second run after the sun set and pulled another Identical 13.7 @105mph with a 2.2 60ft.And how do you know your tires weren't gripping well? You never told me your 60' ft?
Oh yeah. I pulled a 13.7 @ 105mph at 4,000ft in Fallon and pulled a 13.2 @ 111mph at sea level in Sacramento. with the exact same mods. Works out to a little over a tenth of a second for every 1,000ft of elevation.
Last edited by TheBlueKnight; 04-08-2010 at 12:07 PM.
#17
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sparks NV
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The track is 4200ft, but the air that day was good. I didn't have a weather station and I didn't hear the announcer say what the DA was. I'm guessing in the low-mid 5000s. But NHRA index correction is .4 et at that track. I've typically seen gains from Fallon to Sac in .5~.9 range on cars that aren't creating their own atmosphere or making big horsepower.
#18
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
The track is 4200ft, but the air that day was good. I didn't have a weather station and I didn't hear the announcer say what the DA was. I'm guessing in the low-mid 5000s. But NHRA index correction is .4 et at that track. I've typically seen gains from Fallon to Sac in .5~.9 range on cars that aren't creating their own atmosphere or making big horsepower.
#20
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you have/ are getting LT's be sure to get the Corvette o2's. They are longer and do not require extensions. I went through 2 sets with the o2 extensions. For some reason they didn't last long, I blame the extentions. My Corvette o2's have lasted a couple years now. They are Bosch.