WTF happened - LS1TECH

Go Back   LS1TECH > WELCOME TO LS1TECH > New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech
Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by
Improved Racing

WTF happened

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-20-2011, 12:08 PM   #1
TECH Enthusiast
 
wicked383lt1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: En Casa del Carajo
Posts: 523
Angry WTF happened

Before I installed my LTs and ory with the ls6 intake and tune I had 300rwhp. I put all this **** on and gained 8rwhp and lost two of tq. WTF happened?
__________________
98" T/A,a4,gu5,3.23's,lid, ls6 intake,pp\tb, Lts,3"tsp ory,3" cutout,& dyno tune 340rwhp/ 337rwtq


"WHEN IN DOUBT,"
wicked383lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 12:11 PM   #2
TECH Addict
 
omarrakeen's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UAE, Dubai.
Posts: 2,425
Default

what about the rest of the curve? dont only compare max hp and tq any pics of before and after curves? but still strange tho!
__________________
1998 Black Camaro Z28 : | SLP lid | |SLP smooth bellow| | K&N | | FRA Mod | | LS6 Intake | | Flowtech LTs| | custom 3" ORY| | Magnaflow cat-back |

omarrakeen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 12:12 PM   #3
TECH Regular
 
CRAZZ28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 13
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 437
Default

what catback do you have and was the tune done by a reputable tuner?
__________________
94 Z28 M6 turbo project in the works
98 T/A M6 Dart 205, torquer v2, stock bottom end 448hp/393tq
CRAZZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 12:14 PM   #4
TECH Fanatic
 
Rare96LT1Formula's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRAZZ28 View Post
what catback do you have and was the tune done by a reputable tuner?
^ This.

Those numbers sound fairly low to begin with.
__________________
Huron Speed V2 Non-AC, BMR Turbo KMember, Adjustable Lower A-Arms, Upper A-Arms, T-56 Relocation Crossmember, Viking Double Adjustable Coilovers - 550LB Front Springs, UMI Tubular SFC's & Strut Tower Brace, Founders 3 Piece Poly LCA's, LCA Relocation Brackets, Adjustable Panhard Bar, and Torque Arm.

In The Works: MWC 9, TR6060, Callies Dragonslayer, Oliver Rods, Diamond Pistons, Moran Atomizers, Squash Performance, etc.
Rare96LT1Formula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 12:19 PM   #5
TECH Enthusiast
 
wicked383lt1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: En Casa del Carajo
Posts: 523
Default

I don't have a cat back and had my car dynoed by Dan from masport.
__________________
98" T/A,a4,gu5,3.23's,lid, ls6 intake,pp\tb, Lts,3"tsp ory,3" cutout,& dyno tune 340rwhp/ 337rwtq


"WHEN IN DOUBT,"
wicked383lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 12:34 PM   #6
TECH Regular
 
CRAZZ28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 13
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wicked383lt1 View Post
I don't have a cat back and had my car dynoed by Dan from masport.
I would make a catback your next mod as the stock muffler and I pipe are now restricting your exhaust flow. You shouldn't have lost torque at all. peak tq will move a little higher in the rpm range but there is no way it should have lost any. Was it dynoed at masport both times? and was it dyno tuned or are you still on stock tune?
__________________
94 Z28 M6 turbo project in the works
98 T/A M6 Dart 205, torquer v2, stock bottom end 448hp/393tq
CRAZZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 12:43 PM   #7
TECH Enthusiast
 
wicked383lt1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: En Casa del Carajo
Posts: 523
Default

Dynoed and tuned at masport...the first time I dynoed the car for a baseline it was a local shop in Miami. Only mods were the free mods and the car made 300rwhp and 320rwtq. I didnt think that I pipe and muffler would restrict it that much. Also my ory is vibrating on the undercarriage. But the tuner say that wouldn't affect the knock sensor
__________________
98" T/A,a4,gu5,3.23's,lid, ls6 intake,pp\tb, Lts,3"tsp ory,3" cutout,& dyno tune 340rwhp/ 337rwtq


"WHEN IN DOUBT,"
wicked383lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 12:49 PM   #8
TECH Regular
 
CRAZZ28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 13
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wicked383lt1 View Post
Dynoed and tuned at masport...the first time I dynoed the car for a baseline it was a local shop in Miami. Only mods were the free mods and the car made 300rwhp and 320rwtq. I didnt think that I pipe and muffler would restrict it that much. Also my ory is vibrating on the undercarriage. But the tuner say that wouldn't affect the knock sensor
That is probably where you "lost" the tq then. Different dynos will ready differently. dyno jet will show more hp and tq than a mustang dyno. and even if 2 different dynos are the same model they will not read 100% the same. thats why you cant put too much though or effort into dyno numbers. If you can spare the money for a dyno pull or 2 go back to the local shop it was dynoed at for the baseline and run it again and see what it shows.
__________________
94 Z28 M6 turbo project in the works
98 T/A M6 Dart 205, torquer v2, stock bottom end 448hp/393tq
CRAZZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 02:22 PM   #9
LS1Tech Administrator
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lincolnwood, IL Member: #317
Posts: 20,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRAZZ28 View Post
That is probably where you "lost" the tq then. Different dynos will ready differently. dyno jet will show more hp and tq than a mustang dyno. and even if 2 different dynos are the same model they will not read 100% the same. thats why you cant put too much though or effort into dyno numbers. If you can spare the money for a dyno pull or 2 go back to the local shop it was dynoed at for the baseline and run it again and see what it shows.
Exactly.

You can't do a direct comparison of before and after mods on two different dynos. If you go back to the original dyno, you might find that you gained more like ~20rwhp.

I also agree that the stock muffler is holding you back though. You will never see the most out of your headers and intake with a stock muffler. At the very least, get a cutout.
__________________
1998 Camaro Z28 | 1971 Nova SS-350



Previous LSx Vehicles:
2002 Camaro Z28 | 2000 Trans Am WS6 | 1999 Camaro Z28
RPM WS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 08:43 PM   #10
TECH Enthusiast
 
wicked383lt1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: En Casa del Carajo
Posts: 523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPM WS6 View Post
Exactly.

You can't do a direct comparison of before and after mods on two different dynos. If you go back to the original dyno, you might find that you gained more like ~20rwhp.

I also agree that the stock muffler is holding you back though. You will never see the most out of your headers and intake with a stock muffler. At the very least, get a cutout.
Well the first one was a regular dyno not sure of the name but it was different to the 2nd one. The 2nd one was a mustang dyno. What are the differences in the two?
__________________
98" T/A,a4,gu5,3.23's,lid, ls6 intake,pp\tb, Lts,3"tsp ory,3" cutout,& dyno tune 340rwhp/ 337rwtq


"WHEN IN DOUBT,"
wicked383lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 09:37 PM   #11
On The Tree
 
FNSlow's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NC/SC
Posts: 127
Send a message via AIM to FNSlow
Default

haha, every dyno will read different, even 2 mustang dynos. Also, you only gain power if you remove your lowest restriction.
__________________
-Ryan

'01 Procharged WS6 - Slow
'06 CBR600RR - Slower
FNSlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 09:49 PM   #12
TECH Addict
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,301
Default

Mustang dynos read very low. A car that dynos 300rwh on a MD could put down 320-325rwh on a dyno jet.
MikeWS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 10:20 AM   #13
Launching!
 
Scoobysnacks's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lil Rhody
Posts: 240
Default

All dynos are different and a catback or cutouts will improve a little. What matters...did your cars performance feel like it improved? Sometimes its not all about the numbers you put down especially with basic bolt ons.
__________________
02 Pewter z28 m6
Mods: MGW shifter, SLP dual dual, SLP lid S60 w/4.10's Strac, McLeod RXT, BMR adj. panhard/LCA's/sfc's, Hooker stainless LTs, prothane mounts, MSD wires, SJM linelock, Slowhawk cam/243 heads/tune

Scoobysnacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 10:53 AM   #14
12 Second Club
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 13
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,416
Default

OP, don't worry too much since you did it on 2 different dynos. If you are too concerned with it, then go back to a local dynojet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rare96LT1Formula View Post
^ This.

Those numbers sound fairly low to begin with.
How is 300rwhp weak to begin with? That's right on par with what a stock LS1 should put down. As he said: "Only mods were the free mods and the car made 300rwhp and 320rwtq." Those numbers are fine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scoobysnacks View Post
All dynos are different and a catback or cutouts will improve a little. What matters...did your cars performance feel like it improved? Sometimes its not all about the numbers you put down especially with basic bolt ons.
^That is what you should be worried about. I felt a definite gain from doing my headers on the buttdyno.
__________________
-------------------------------
Bad Bowtie Productions
-------------------------------

LIKE BBP on Facebook!!!
WSsick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 11:26 AM   #15
TECH Enthusiast
 
wicked383lt1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: En Casa del Carajo
Posts: 523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSsick View Post
OP, don't worry too much since you did it on 2 different dynos. If you are too concerned with it, then go back to a local dynojet.



How is 300rwhp weak to begin with? That's right on par with what a stock LS1 should put down. As he said: "Only mods were the free mods and the car made 300rwhp and 320rwtq." Those numbers are fine.



^That is what you should be worried about. I felt a definite gain from doing my headers on the buttdyno.
Butt dyno says that there is a nice gain rwhp...I guess your right.
__________________
98" T/A,a4,gu5,3.23's,lid, ls6 intake,pp\tb, Lts,3"tsp ory,3" cutout,& dyno tune 340rwhp/ 337rwtq


"WHEN IN DOUBT,"
wicked383lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 12:22 PM   #16
LS1Tech Administrator
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lincolnwood, IL Member: #317
Posts: 20,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSsick View Post
How is 300rwhp weak to begin with? That's right on par with what a stock LS1 should put down. As he said: "Only mods were the free mods and the car made 300rwhp and 320rwtq." Those numbers are fine.


300rwhp is a very good number for a stock A4 LS1. There are many A4s that only dyno 28x-29x rwhp in stock form.
__________________
1998 Camaro Z28 | 1971 Nova SS-350



Previous LSx Vehicles:
2002 Camaro Z28 | 2000 Trans Am WS6 | 1999 Camaro Z28
RPM WS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 01:20 PM   #17
Internet Mechanic
 
BlackScreaminMachine's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 17
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wallingford CT
Posts: 9,841
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPM WS6 View Post


300rwhp is a very good number for a stock A4 LS1. There are many A4s that only dyno 28x-29x rwhp in stock form.
For reference. My 2002 w/ m6 and 10 bolt and no other mod then Free Ram Air, descreen of the MAF, and SLP LID put down 324 RWHP on a Superflow dyno which has characteristic of both Dynojet and a Mustang. They are big in the Diesel Tuning crowd.
__________________
2002 NBM Trans Am SOLD!

http://ls1tech.com/forums/vehicle-cl...l#post17273103
BlackScreaminMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 01:28 PM   #18
Teching In
 
m_liel's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wicked383lt1 View Post
Butt dyno says that there is a nice gain rwhp...I guess your right.
Don't just go off the butt dyno as those things can be deceiving at times. LOL Take it to the track and see if the car is faster than before. That way there's no question.
__________________
2013 Diamond White C63 - Pro Dry Air Filters, CA91 Tune
2002 Camaro SLP SS - LS2, Vortech T-trim, TH400. Sold
2014 Mariana Black Range Rover - 5.0L DI, 8spd AWD
m_liel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 03:04 PM   #19
Internet Mechanic
 
BlackScreaminMachine's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 17
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wallingford CT
Posts: 9,841
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by m_liel View Post
Don't just go off the butt dyno as those things can be deceiving at times. LOL Take it to the track and see if the car is faster than before. That way there's no question.
Another good reference. In order to actually "feel" a different the RWHP increase needs to be at least 8% or better improvement over the original #. Anything off the throttle is throttle response and should not count in that "opinion".

Using my prev example IF my Dyno'ed 305 RWHP stock which is not out of the realm of possibilities, and the 324 RWHP was the new figure, with dividing the new # over the old I get 6.2% increase and to be honest, I really did not "feel" it. The mods that I felt was gears (converter for A4 cars) due to the TQ multiplication and my cam swap.

Also to mention Header/Cat back + tune which was done after the lid felt a good gain too. I made 355 RWHP with that and that came to about 9.7%.
__________________
2002 NBM Trans Am SOLD!

http://ls1tech.com/forums/vehicle-cl...l#post17273103
BlackScreaminMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 03:15 PM   #20
12 Second Club
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 13
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackScreaminMachine View Post
Another good reference. In order to actually "feel" a different the RWHP increase needs to be at least 8% or better improvement over the original #. Anything off the throttle is throttle response and should not count in that "opinion".

Using my prev example IF my Dyno'ed 305 RWHP stock which is not out of the realm of possibilities, and the 324 RWHP was the new figure, with dividing the new # over the old I get 6.2% increase and to be honest, I really did not "feel" it. The mods that I felt was gears (converter for A4 cars) due to the TQ multiplication and my cam swap.

Also to mention Header/Cat back + tune which was done after the lid felt a good gain too. I made 355 RWHP with that and that came to about 9.7%.
Curious to where you got the 8% figure from. I could definitely feel the difference from headers and gears, but I could even feel the difference from lid/LTs/true duals when I added an LS6 intake (without a tune). Definitely spun in places it never did before the swap. I could even feel the "smoothing" from the tune after I got it, but that wasn't really a power gain.
__________________
-------------------------------
Bad Bowtie Productions
-------------------------------

LIKE BBP on Facebook!!!
WSsick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 03:15 PM
LS1Tech
Pontiac Firebird




Paid Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Join Ls1Tech

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details