HP Tuners 2 BAR SD Tune boost fueling issue
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
HP Tuners 2 BAR SD Tune boost fueling issue
2004 CTS-V with an Edelbrock Eforce, cam, heads, etc. I've had the tune nailed down for a while and just noticed this yesterday while logging. I have the BE set up for fueling under boost (high load low rpm etc) and the PE set a bit more aggressive for max performance. At an airport now and do not have the tune handy, but figured I would ask this now since I don't remember this issue when I dialed the tune in.
I found that when the BE kicks in under light boost (outside of the PE parameters) the ST/LT trims reign the AFR back to stoich. Example, fourth gear up hill at 1800 RPM I crack the throttle a bit and get about 2-3 lbs of boost. The BE richen the mixture and I can watch the fuel trims ramp negative incredibly fast to lean the AFR back to stoich. This does not happen in PE, just BE.
Anyone ever seen this? I don't remember this being the case last time I tuned it. I cannot turn off the fuel trims as this is mainly a street driven car.
With the fuel trims leaning out the BE fueling, it kinda makes the BE pointless.
Anyone have any ideas?
I found that when the BE kicks in under light boost (outside of the PE parameters) the ST/LT trims reign the AFR back to stoich. Example, fourth gear up hill at 1800 RPM I crack the throttle a bit and get about 2-3 lbs of boost. The BE richen the mixture and I can watch the fuel trims ramp negative incredibly fast to lean the AFR back to stoich. This does not happen in PE, just BE.
Anyone ever seen this? I don't remember this being the case last time I tuned it. I cannot turn off the fuel trims as this is mainly a street driven car.
With the fuel trims leaning out the BE fueling, it kinda makes the BE pointless.
Anyone have any ideas?
#3
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
It may not always act as fast as PE, however it is independent. I am still seeing the enrichment, however the fuel trims are not locked as they are with PE so the trims lean back to stoich. Don't recall seeing this before.
#5
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Thanks to both of you.
#6
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
One thing to watch out for is that the BE can be delayed on some OS's. In those cases, just set the PE enable to 95 KPA and set the enrichment to 1.13 until the RPM that your over ~105 KPA, then set the enrichment as desired.
Russ Kemp
Trending Topics
#8
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Clinton MD
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure if this is directly related, but I changed my PE to 100KPA and 25% TPS and the car would fall on its face during the burn out. It would also stumble very badily on the launch until I went into boost (or above 105 KPA where the BE kicks in).
My guess is I satisfied one of the criteria (TPS) and not the other (KPA). I lowered the KPA back down to 15 and left the TPS setting at 25% and now it seems to do much better. I'm still not sure if I using the correct approach because I'm basically in PE the entire the car is running as long as I'm above 25% TPS correct?
My guess is I satisfied one of the criteria (TPS) and not the other (KPA). I lowered the KPA back down to 15 and left the TPS setting at 25% and now it seems to do much better. I'm still not sure if I using the correct approach because I'm basically in PE the entire the car is running as long as I'm above 25% TPS correct?
#12
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Clinton MD
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To be honest I didn't even relaize you could get into BE without going into PE 1st.
#14
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Clinton MD
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you think the PE & BE thresholds were too close and I was dealing with the delay of the BE that others were talking about?
#15
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
I posted this earlier in thread "but I changed my PE to 100KPA and 25% TPS and the car would fall on its face during the burn out. It would also stumble very badily on the launch until I went into boost (or above 105 KPA where the BE kicks in). "
Do you think the PE & BE thresholds were too close and I was dealing with the delay of the BE that others were talking about?
Do you think the PE & BE thresholds were too close and I was dealing with the delay of the BE that others were talking about?
#16
I've started looking into these settings. If I understand correctly, I won't enter PE until the TPS setting is met: example TPS needs to be above 29% and above 4k RPM and if not it is running in closed loop? Or am I entering PE above 15kpa? I wouldn't think not as I disable PE it by setting the TPS 100%.
Once in PE I am running stoich which is 14.5 then it seems like it is using the richer of the two, PE vs BE and dividing by 1.24 for 11.69
This all sound about right or am I missing something?
Once in PE I am running stoich which is 14.5 then it seems like it is using the richer of the two, PE vs BE and dividing by 1.24 for 11.69
This all sound about right or am I missing something?
#17
TECH Apprentice
Also running an eforce and I don't use the BE. I don't see any need for it and with some saying it has a delay, why bother.
A quote from Chris at HPT...
the issue is it does not activate as fast as PE does, there is a longer delay due to the processing loop the code is in.
For any kind of engine driven supercharger just use PE.
BE was intended for use as a safety mechanism on turbocharged vehicles when the turbo could spool for some reason below the PE threshold and run lean. This generally happens if the turbocharger is not sized correctly for the engine (too big or too small). When i had twin turbo's on my car i used PE only and had BE set to enable at the same enrichment as PE when boost exceeded 110kPa. Usually if the turbo is unexpectedly spooling it is not at a high load situation anyway (your TPS is below PE threshold).
A quote from Chris at HPT...
the issue is it does not activate as fast as PE does, there is a longer delay due to the processing loop the code is in.
For any kind of engine driven supercharger just use PE.
BE was intended for use as a safety mechanism on turbocharged vehicles when the turbo could spool for some reason below the PE threshold and run lean. This generally happens if the turbocharger is not sized correctly for the engine (too big or too small). When i had twin turbo's on my car i used PE only and had BE set to enable at the same enrichment as PE when boost exceeded 110kPa. Usually if the turbo is unexpectedly spooling it is not at a high load situation anyway (your TPS is below PE threshold).
#18
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Clinton MD
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also running an eforce and I don't use the BE. I don't see any need for it and with some saying it has a delay, why bother.
A quote from Chris at HPT...
the issue is it does not activate as fast as PE does, there is a longer delay due to the processing loop the code is in.
For any kind of engine driven supercharger just use PE.
BE was intended for use as a safety mechanism on turbocharged vehicles when the turbo could spool for some reason below the PE threshold and run lean. This generally happens if the turbocharger is not sized correctly for the engine (too big or too small). When i had twin turbo's on my car i used PE only and had BE set to enable at the same enrichment as PE when boost exceeded 110kPa. Usually if the turbo is unexpectedly spooling it is not at a high load situation anyway (your TPS is below PE threshold).
A quote from Chris at HPT...
the issue is it does not activate as fast as PE does, there is a longer delay due to the processing loop the code is in.
For any kind of engine driven supercharger just use PE.
BE was intended for use as a safety mechanism on turbocharged vehicles when the turbo could spool for some reason below the PE threshold and run lean. This generally happens if the turbocharger is not sized correctly for the engine (too big or too small). When i had twin turbo's on my car i used PE only and had BE set to enable at the same enrichment as PE when boost exceeded 110kPa. Usually if the turbo is unexpectedly spooling it is not at a high load situation anyway (your TPS is below PE threshold).
#19
TECH Apprentice
I haven't played enough with it to confirm that, but from the descriptions above, it seems that's the case.
#20
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dickinson, Tx
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts