O2 voltages - narrowband to wideband correlation - LS1TECH

Log In 


PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | AutoTap | Diablo | MAF Translator | HPP3 | FAST | Gen7 | Big Stuff 3
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

O2 voltages - narrowband to wideband correlation

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-16-2004, 10:21 PM   #1
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,539
Default O2 voltages - narrowband to wideband correlation

Summary:
Stock(ish) exhaust
910mV = 11.6:1
870mV = 12.7:1

[attached .gif with my two correlation points
superimposed on "standard" O2 volts vs mixture
w/ temp curves]

Narrative (read it before acting on Summary)

I've asked for this a number of times but never got any.
Hoping to be able to tune "good enuf" with the in-car
O2s.

Just got my LM-1 wideband today, and now I can give
my unfortunate narrowband brothers at least one
datapoint. This is for a stock manifolds, gutted cats
car (so front O2s are still pretty much as stock, as
far as the operating environment).

Originally I was tuning for a 910mV target and seeing
900-920mV. I thought this was a good safe place.
Turns out this had me at 11.4-11.7:1 AFR. Oink.

Tonight I edited my PE and OLFA tables until I got it
to a steady 12.6-12.7:1 across the RPM band doing
highway punches. This gave readings of 860-880mV
(call it 870mV, lots of jitter).

I had to pull out 1 degree of spark in the 4000-5000RPM
range to keep from KR. This table had been hand-whittled
to the old AFR range. So there was not a big penalty there.

Sample size of one, make of it what you will. Maybe others
with similar, or differing exhaust configs and some wideband
correlation will chime in.
Attached Thumbnails
O2 voltages - narrowband to wideband correlation-o2_wb_nb_corr.gif  

Last edited by jimmyblue; 08-19-2004 at 08:47 AM.
jimmyblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2004, 10:51 PM   #2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 1,041
Default

notice any performance increases after leaning it out? I have the same deal. I was shooting for .890s-.910s and im at 11.8-12.0 on my LM-1. But, i have cats so who knows what that does lol.>

Dave
TT_Vert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 07:43 AM   #3
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Default

Jimmy are you running in open loop now?
HumpinSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 07:46 AM   #4
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,539
Default

No, the car is semi-factory-normal, just messing the
mixture & spark around but keeping the closed loop
in idle/cruise. And minus a few little things like cat
honeycomb, rear O2s ignored, etc.
jimmyblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 07:55 AM   #5
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Default

how are you using the WB and the car staying in closed loop. Are you using the programmable output to feed back to your PCM
HumpinSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 08:00 AM   #6
TECH Addict
 
Predator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,430
Default

Jimmy, that's been my experience exactly. My O2s are 860/870, and the car makes the most power, according to EASE's DELTORQ, and it feels, without question, SOTP, the fastest, plus no more backfires, very little knock, and insignificant KR (under 1*). I needed to scale my PE vs RPM to maintain 860-870 O2 readings.
Predator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 08:04 AM   #7
TECH Regular
 
deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 434
Default

My O2s agree almost exactly with jimmyblue:
910mV = 11.5:1
870mV = 12.7:1

Stock-looking 6.0L truck exhaust (clean cats and holey muffler).
LM-1 mounted in rear O2 port. Rear O2s turned off. WB readings agree before and after "cleaning" my cats.
I think I need to try the open loop excercise to get my VE, PE tables smoothed out. Never enough time...
deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 08:11 AM   #8
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HumpinSS
how are you using the WB and the car staying in closed loop. Are you using the programmable output to feed back to your PCM
I have a bung in the I-pipe, gutted cats, and the "outer
feedback loop" is me pulling over at the next interchange,
editing the PE/OLFA tables, and getting back on the
Interstate for some more 70-90 kickdown punches.
Closed loop uses the factory front O2s.

Re the Delivered Torque readings - I didn't see any
significant response there. I plotted them last night,
from the different logs I took after changing. But
DT is only a PCM estimate and I don't believe it
comprehends fuel (O2s), just airflow and spark timing
with some fancy calculations based on some factory
assumptions. I should have dug out the old G-meter....
jimmyblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 08:23 AM   #9
TECH Addict
 
Predator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,430
Default

Jimmy, with the EASE scanner, there is a direct correlation.
Predator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 10:11 AM   #10
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,539
Default

How does the EASE get delivered torque? Is it
a true measure (like crank sensor acceleration
ripple)? Or something like EFILive where it takes
VSS derivative and vehicle weight?
jimmyblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 10:57 AM   #11
TECH Addict
 
Predator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,430
Default

Jimmy, that's a good question, and it was explained to me but I don't recall, plus I'm not the most technical person. I will have to defer to Team ZR1 for a better explanation (if he's around to respond).

When I bought EASE a couple years ago, a major selling point for me was learning that the deltorq values, unlike competitors, could be relied on for tuning purposes. Team ZR1 has tuned hundreds and hundreds of cars, if not thousands, using data from EASE, without a wideband. And this thread interested me because I arrived at the same conclusions, about narrow-band readings, using just EASE, as you did with your scanner, plus an LM-1.

I can't prove this, but I always suspected that the competitors don't have useful deltorq values because it's good for business to have folks buying dyno time, and lately, purchasing wideband equipment. Heck, lots of sponsors here offer dyno tuning. Imagine if every online here was using EASE, don't you think that would impact tuners and dyno operators? Just a theory. How can I prove it?
Predator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 11:02 AM   #12
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Default

You can prove it by having more that 2 EASE users verify such, but even still you will have a very hard time convincing the masses that a narrow band o2 is just as accurate as a purpose built wideband o2 using a PID that is derived from a mass andacceleration formula
HumpinSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 11:34 AM   #13
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,539
Default

I know my EFILive has both the Delivered Torque PID,
and a facility to get rear wheel torque / HP by using
the vehicle's mass, acceleration, tire diameter etc.

I thought that there was also a way to get crankshaft
torque, by sensing the acceleration ripple of the crank
sensor (with some fudging for materials constants, the
crank being basically a beam type torque wrench in
motion or something like). But, the DT PIDs have been
explained to me as a more theoretical, calculated from
intake side sensors and mapped to engine torque by
some mystery math, kind of deal.

Would be very interested to know the basis of the
EASE facility - so's I can go badger HPTuners to
provide the same
jimmyblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 12:00 PM   #14
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
P Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,384
Default

Damn I must be rich as hell at .94. I need that hptuner wideband soon.
P Mack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 12:16 PM   #15
TECH Addict
 
Predator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HumpinSS
You can prove it by having more that 2 EASE users verify such, but even still you will have a very hard time convincing the masses that a narrow band o2 is just as accurate as a purpose built wideband o2 using a PID that is derived from a mass andacceleration formula
HumpinSS, if Team ZR1 couldn't convince folks, what hope is there for me? And ultimately, it doesn't matter: as long as people are getting good tunes using just EASE, or autotap and widebands meters or dynos, that's all that really matters. The only advantage of EASE is that you don't need wideband equipment or a dyno. And Jimmy's thread really interested me because his findings, using a wideband, matched my findings, exactly, just using EASE. To me, that's proof. As far as anyone else, obviously not. But you know what man, it's all good! You tune your way, and get a good tune; I tune my way, and get a good tune, and we all enjoy driving our cars just the same.

Predator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 02:04 PM   #16
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Predator
HumpinSS, if Team ZR1 couldn't convince folks, what hope is there for me? And ultimately, it doesn't matter: as long as people are getting good tunes using just EASE, or autotap and widebands meters or dynos, that's all that really matters. The only advantage of EASE is that you don't need wideband equipment or a dyno. And Jimmy's thread really interested me because his findings, using a wideband, matched my findings, exactly, just using EASE. To me, that's proof. As far as anyone else, obviously not. But you know what man, it's all good! You tune your way, and get a good tune; I tune my way, and get a good tune, and we all enjoy driving our cars just the same.

I don't need to be convinced (I already have my tools
bought) and I don't care to get into personalities,
but I always like to acquire knowledge.
jimmyblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 02:53 PM   #17
TECH Addict
 
Predator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyblue
I don't need to be convinced (I already have my tools
bought) and I don't care to get into personalities,
but I always like to acquire knowledge.
Exactly Jimmy, that was my point. You've found your method of tuning, and I've found mine, and they both work.

As far as imparting knowledge, I'm sure you know way more about this stuff than me. As far as EASE, I'm just telling you what I've learned, and it's not much use to you except informational, and even then, I don't have the hard technical data you guys love so much. To me, tuning is both an Art and a Science, hard data is important, but you can go a long way with a mixture of some crucial data, and seat-of-the-pants gut level data.

BTW, I digress about a thread in the "Tools" forum, but who knows when I'll have another chance to chat with you, but I took 1/4" and 5/8" ratchets, I had laying around, cut off most of the handles, and now I have two palm-sized ratchets to use for tight places. I think the 1/4" one will work great on those back bolts of the coil packs.
Predator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2004, 08:49 AM   #18
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,539
Default

I put my two wideband-narrowband correlation
data points onto an O2 volts/AFR graph I had,
which indicates the 750C EGT curve is roughly
right as a guide for stock-manifolds cars. I
attached this as a .gif, to the original post.
jimmyblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Large Fuel Trims = Bad Primary O2s? kylush PCM Diagnostics & Tuning 15 06-22-2014 06:42 AM
O2 sensor heater problems?? should the the heater allways be on with the ignition or 94camaroz28lt1 PCM Diagnostics & Tuning 9 02-15-2011 07:27 PM
Equivalence A/F ratio vs. O2 mv reading DavidGXP LS4 Performance 5 02-11-2011 10:59 AM
bank 1 o2 (50mv-950mv) - bank 2 o2 flatlined (430mv-450mv)? senicalj4579 PCM Diagnostics & Tuning 27 12-12-2010 05:48 PM
HP Tuner Narrowband O2 Tune Help please.. z28onspray PCM Diagnostics & Tuning 4 01-29-2007 09:05 AM


Tags
126, 920, advantages, afr, band, hp, ls1, ls3, mixture, narrow, narrowband, o2, sensor, setting, tuners, voltage, wide, wideband, wv

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.