PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

IFR effects on LTFT and WOT??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2006, 10:56 PM
  #1  
SBD
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
SBD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default IFR effects on LTFT and WOT??

Can someone explain what happens when IFR are modified?

What affect does modifying IFR have on LTFT and WOT?

Does it affect injector DC at all?
Old 04-08-2006, 11:36 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IFR will have a direct affect on LTFT's as well as you AFR at WOT. Do not change IFR at all unless you change to a different sized injector. Do tuning via VE and MAF tables.
Old 04-09-2006, 12:35 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
RedHardSupra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

so let's say you're mixing cement

your shovel can move 1 pound of cement per second to the mixer (or whatever that's called) you supposed to mix cement and water in 1/13 proportions. you have a hose going in there that you believe delivers 13lb/sec of water. however, the hose is clogged, and you don't know about it, all you know is that your mixture despite your best effort is a bit off. so instead of checking what's wrong with the hose, you decide to grab a bigger or smaller shovel depending if your mixture is too watery or too solid.
did you get the right mixture in the end? yes. did you get the right amount of it? no!

this is exactly what IFR tweaking does to your engine. instead of looking at the source of the problem, you just try to make up for it somewhere else.
Old 04-09-2006, 12:44 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedHardSupra
so let's say you're mixing cement

your shovel can move 1 pound of cement per second to the mixer (or whatever that's called) you supposed to mix cement and water in 1/13 proportions. you have a hose going in there that you believe delivers 13lb/sec of water. however, the hose is clogged, and you don't know about it, all you know is that your mixture despite your best effort is a bit off. so instead of checking what's wrong with the hose, you decide to grab a bigger or smaller shovel depending if your mixture is too watery or too solid.
did you get the right mixture in the end? yes. did you get the right amount of it? no!

this is exactly what IFR tweaking does to your engine. instead of looking at the source of the problem, you just try to make up for it somewhere else.
Well said!!
Old 04-09-2006, 04:49 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
ringram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny London, UK
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yep, consider your IFR a constant like cylinder displacement, or cam spec. Set it to what it should be and forget it.
Old 04-09-2006, 01:04 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
tici's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Zurich - Switzerland
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
IFR will have a direct affect on LTFT's as well as you AFR at WOT. Do not change IFR at all unless you change to a different sized injector. Do tuning via VE and MAF tables.
Timing depends on G/cyl which depends on G/sec.
I don't agree with this of tuning the MAF table because it messes with timing too (indirectly).
I really prefer IFR alone.
Old 04-09-2006, 01:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tici
Timing depends on G/cyl which depends on G/sec.
I don't agree with this of tuning the MAF table because it messes with timing too (indirectly).
I really prefer IFR alone.
Doing it via IFR is just fooling the computer. Wouldnt you want your sensors to operate like they should and accurately report the amount of air entering the engine? Also if you unplugged the MAF the pcm has to get timing from somewhere and I would say that it gets by the timing via the spark table which is in gms/sec but since the maf is unplugged it uses the MAP and converts the MAP signal to what it would be in gms/sec and applies that to the spark table to get the timing, keep in mind that IFR is ran by MAP signal also as well, so either way the timing would be scewed by your assumption. Someone correct me if im wrong.

Last edited by brad8266; 04-09-2006 at 01:22 PM.
Old 04-09-2006, 01:44 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
RedHardSupra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

http://redhardsupra.blogspot.com/200...ing-jihad.html

enjoy
Old 04-09-2006, 01:44 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
SSpdDmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tici
Timing depends on G/cyl which depends on G/sec.
I don't agree with this of tuning the MAF table because it messes with timing too (indirectly).
I really prefer IFR alone.
In EFILive, it tells us that timing comes from the GM.DYNCYLAIR_DMA pid. So, regardless of the MAF, timing is calculated this way. Not tuning the MAF is only going to lead to bandaiding the fueling to get your AFR's in line (just the same as "tweaking" the IFR tables).
Old 04-09-2006, 02:20 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TAQuickness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

as an additional perspective...

IFR is an easy constant to get right. VE can be tuned with a correct IFR, and MAF can be tuned with a correct VE and IFR. Now spark can be tuned because MAF, VE & IFR are correct.
Old 04-09-2006, 02:32 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

And if IFR, VE, MAF are correct, then PE becomes 'what you see is what you get'.
Old 04-09-2006, 02:49 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
RedHardSupra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by joecar
And if IFR, VE, MAF are correct, then PE becomes 'what you see is what you get'.
it's not THAT simple, but it is the idea. normally spark and ect has a lot to say about your real vs commanded afr. it is helluva lot closer than doing it using any other method, but the best part is that the only thing you have to change is PE, which doesn't screw up your normal driving, as it applies only to WOT.
Old 04-09-2006, 03:36 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
In EFILive, it tells us that timing comes from the GM.DYNCYLAIR_DMA pid. So, regardless of the MAF, timing is calculated this way. Not tuning the MAF is only going to lead to bandaiding the fueling to get your AFR's in line (just the same as "tweaking" the IFR tables).
I knew timing didnt come from MAf cause if it did and the maf broke timing would be screwed.
Old 04-09-2006, 03:38 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedHardSupra
it's not THAT simple, but it is the idea. normally spark and ect has a lot to say about your real vs commanded afr. it is helluva lot closer than doing it using any other method, but the best part is that the only thing you have to change is PE, which doesn't screw up your normal driving, as it applies only to WOT.
Its great now that I got ve and MAf dialed in cause now I can easily do the division in order to quickly go in and change AFR. Every time I want to change AFR at WOT all it takes is a quick change in the PE table and its done.
Old 04-09-2006, 04:11 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
tici's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Zurich - Switzerland
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
In EFILive, it tells us that timing comes from the GM.DYNCYLAIR_DMA pid. So, regardless of the MAF, timing is calculated this way. Not tuning the MAF is only going to lead to bandaiding the fueling to get your AFR's in line (just the same as "tweaking" the IFR tables).
From where is this pid taking the G/cyl values? If not from the MAF then it should be from the VE (what else could give an information about that?)




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.