1963 TTLS Chevy II SS
07-03-2015, 02:12 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Olympia Wa.
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1963 TTLS Chevy II SS Year: 1963
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Nova
Price: $50000
Mileage: 0
Private or Dealer Listing: Private Listing
Location (State): WA
Color: Black
Transmission: Automatic
LS Engine?: Car has LS engine
Engine specs to serious parties only as this was also built for grudge racing.
Build thread on Yellowbullet under Mables Makeover
$50k
07-05-2015, 04:45 PM
#4
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Olympia Wa.
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trades/part trades accepted are:
55 chevy 2 door post
67-69 camaro
2012 up 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4
65-68 mustang fastback
59 Cadillac 2 door or convertable
62-67 nova hardtop
55 chevy 2 door post
67-69 camaro
2012 up 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4
65-68 mustang fastback
59 Cadillac 2 door or convertable
62-67 nova hardtop
Last edited by DHR Darren; 07-07-2015 at 05:52 AM.
07-08-2015, 07:47 AM
#7
Almost a twin to my Nova. Very nice looking build. I noticed your comment in my post about the 69 camaro and I assume you inquired as to why this with seemingly more high end work is priced lower. Being as I own a built Nova II as well I will give the following observations on this.
1st gen Camaro tax. They simply are a higher price point to get into.
Pro touring style builds often appeal to a larger market. But it seems we both prefer more drag oriented cars.
Not sure you mentioned body condition or not but a ton of money goes into body restoration and paint which again is important to a certain buyer and market. Not all.
Anyhow free bump for you and I really love your II. If I didn't have an extremely similar one this is a car I would love to own.
1st gen Camaro tax. They simply are a higher price point to get into.
Pro touring style builds often appeal to a larger market. But it seems we both prefer more drag oriented cars.
Not sure you mentioned body condition or not but a ton of money goes into body restoration and paint which again is important to a certain buyer and market. Not all.
Anyhow free bump for you and I really love your II. If I didn't have an extremely similar one this is a car I would love to own.
Trending Topics
07-08-2015, 04:20 PM
#8
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Olympia Wa.
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks and I wasn't meaning it negatively if it came across that way. I was just wondering if my price was in the ballpark or not.
Body is solid and never had any rust. Paint is 16 months old. Car was in heated storage from 87 to 2013.
Body is solid and never had any rust. Paint is 16 months old. Car was in heated storage from 87 to 2013.
Almost a twin to my Nova. Very nice looking build. I noticed your comment in my post about the 69 camaro and I assume you inquired as to why this with seemingly more high end work is priced lower. Being as I own a built Nova II as well I will give the following observations on this.
1st gen Camaro tax. They simply are a higher price point to get into.
Pro touring style builds often appeal to a larger market. But it seems we both prefer more drag oriented cars.
Not sure you mentioned body condition or not but a ton of money goes into body restoration and paint which again is important to a certain buyer and market. Not all.
Anyhow free bump for you and I really love your II. If I didn't have an extremely similar one this is a car I would love to own.
1st gen Camaro tax. They simply are a higher price point to get into.
Pro touring style builds often appeal to a larger market. But it seems we both prefer more drag oriented cars.
Not sure you mentioned body condition or not but a ton of money goes into body restoration and paint which again is important to a certain buyer and market. Not all.
Anyhow free bump for you and I really love your II. If I didn't have an extremely similar one this is a car I would love to own.
