Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

ZYBORG C5Z vs SHAKN'04 mach1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2012, 09:21 AM
  #21  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I thought tbe mph for the mach was extremely high. Those cars do good to get to 110 with bolt-ons. I don't see cams being worth 7-9mph on that motor.
Read what I wrote. His 1/8 when he was stock matched mine when I was stock. ET was close to the same yet he trapped 113 to my 105. Now take away close to the same amount now and his car sounds right for the amount of power...114-115mph trap speed. Not to mention he is no john force behind the wheel.
Old 03-26-2012, 09:23 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so hes a worse driver then you... yet in the second half of the track grabs another 8mph on you... both stock.... what??
Old 03-26-2012, 09:25 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

110 is easy with a bolt on mach.
Old 03-26-2012, 09:29 AM
  #24  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
so hes a worse driver then you... yet in the second half of the track grabs another 8mph on you... both stock.... what??
Exactly. I got him to post up his timeslip and compared them then he took his slip down. The track he goes to has a screwed up 1/4 mph sensor.

Basically his 1/8 was 84mph yet 1/4 was 113. That's just funny for a close to stock Mach 1.
Old 03-26-2012, 09:37 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so his 119 trap is actually a 115trap?
Old 03-26-2012, 09:38 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 41863nj
lololol...just re-read REDFIRE 03's comments about needing a blower to compete...i guess for the mustang guy knowing he needs help, it must feel like a penile enhancer...just knowing you need ''help'' just to measure up...lolololol..
Yea the 300+ lb weight advantage doesn't the z at all.
Old 03-26-2012, 09:40 AM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
so his 119 trap is actually a 115trap?
That would sound and look about right.
Old 03-26-2012, 09:40 AM
  #28  
Staging Lane
 
2SSARME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: I'm a Moderator
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

mach defenders to the rescue
Old 03-26-2012, 09:42 AM
  #29  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by automach1
Yea the 300+ lb weight advantage doesn't the z at all.
The weight advantage was great when you ford guys had it with the old foxes....you cry when it goes the other way. Even when your cammed up, pitiful.
Old 03-26-2012, 09:46 AM
  #30  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Read what I wrote. His 1/8 when he was stock matched mine when I was stock. ET was close to the same yet he trapped 113 to my 105. Now take away close to the same amount now and his car sounds right for the amount of power...114-115mph trap speed. Not to mention he is no john force behind the wheel.
119mph kinda went out the window when I watched the roll race. Zyborg's car runs hard but it looked like it was running c6z hard if the Mach ran 119. Regardless nice kill, both cars were bad ***. OP your Z has me jealous..
Old 03-26-2012, 09:50 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it all makes sense now...
Old 03-26-2012, 09:52 AM
  #32  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
so his 119 trap is actually a 115trap?
I would say if he was a good driver. I'd imagine at a different track HE would trap 113.
Old 03-26-2012, 10:04 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
The weight advantage was great when you ford guys had it with the old foxes....you cry when it goes the other way. Even when your cammed up, pitiful.
I could care less as I don't have that problem. Just figured I would point out the obvious.
Old 03-26-2012, 10:08 AM
  #34  
Staging Lane
 
GotHemi?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A lot of what is being said now makes sense. From the start i said it appeared his car was c6z fast. Then said it looked like a 10mph pull. Then hio said his car should trap 123 at best, now truth is the sensors are off at his track and his car is actually a 113-115mph car. Right on the money.

No matter what the OP's car is a strong runner!!
Old 03-26-2012, 10:20 AM
  #35  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GotHemi?
A lot of what is being said now makes sense. From the start i said it appeared his car was c6z fast. Then said it looked like a 10mph pull. Then hio said his car should trap 123 at best, now truth is the sensors are off at his track and his car is actually a 113-115mph car. Right on the money.

No matter what the OP's car is a strong runner!!
Yea Shakn is all butt hurt on SVTP.


Damnit I hate being right...
Old 03-26-2012, 10:39 AM
  #36  
TECH Enthusiast
 
GXPPOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: crossett, Arkansas
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ahaha can you imagine alll the people who run at that track and think they are alot faster they they really are? heck id be a low 12 second 116mph car there LOL
Old 03-26-2012, 10:49 AM
  #37  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Someone invite him over here...
Old 03-26-2012, 11:00 AM
  #38  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GotHemi?
I can see the short gear being the reason for the dragging if they ran em to 140+ but they only went to 120. That was a wayyy harder than a 2mph pull if indeed his car traps 122.

Ive raced a c/i ls2 c6 that traps 125 and he didnt pull me no where near as bad as he pulled that Mach and I trap 118. Heres the video. Take into consideration that he red lighted and got a .300 jump on me.
This! That pull was way to rapid to only be a 2-3mph faster car than the mach 1, i was thinking to myself last night "Atleast 125mph trap car."


Edit: Just read all the comments, yep seems ALOT more believable now I was thinking "god damn 119mph trap, ****". OP's car is definitely a freak, i saw more of his vids his car BOOKS for what it is.

Last edited by adamantium; 03-26-2012 at 11:07 AM.
Old 03-26-2012, 11:21 AM
  #39  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SHAKN' 04
so you can stop your damn whining, 1st one is boltons, second is cammed/boltons.





Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
:beer:

And here is mine

o/r H, catback, shifter


mods in sig (all my times are full weight also)


So you can look at both of our slips and come to conclude that your car at a different track should trap around 113mph while cammed. Just pointing that out and the video concludes seeing as how Zborg probably has a true 120mph car. Not sure what the big deal is.
...........
Old 03-26-2012, 11:30 AM
  #40  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

lol just ask him. So in your opinion how much do you think a stock intake exhaust tune c5z should trap?


Quick Reply: ZYBORG C5Z vs SHAKN'04 mach1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.