ZYBORG C5Z vs SHAKN'04 mach1
#21
Read what I wrote. His 1/8 when he was stock matched mine when I was stock. ET was close to the same yet he trapped 113 to my 105. Now take away close to the same amount now and his car sounds right for the amount of power...114-115mph trap speed. Not to mention he is no john force behind the wheel.
#24
Basically his 1/8 was 84mph yet 1/4 was 113. That's just funny for a close to stock Mach 1.
#26
Yea the 300+ lb weight advantage doesn't the z at all.
#30
Read what I wrote. His 1/8 when he was stock matched mine when I was stock. ET was close to the same yet he trapped 113 to my 105. Now take away close to the same amount now and his car sounds right for the amount of power...114-115mph trap speed. Not to mention he is no john force behind the wheel.
#33
#34
A lot of what is being said now makes sense. From the start i said it appeared his car was c6z fast. Then said it looked like a 10mph pull. Then hio said his car should trap 123 at best, now truth is the sensors are off at his track and his car is actually a 113-115mph car. Right on the money.
No matter what the OP's car is a strong runner!!
No matter what the OP's car is a strong runner!!
#35
A lot of what is being said now makes sense. From the start i said it appeared his car was c6z fast. Then said it looked like a 10mph pull. Then hio said his car should trap 123 at best, now truth is the sensors are off at his track and his car is actually a 113-115mph car. Right on the money.
No matter what the OP's car is a strong runner!!
No matter what the OP's car is a strong runner!!
Damnit I hate being right...
#36
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: crossett, Arkansas
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ahaha can you imagine alll the people who run at that track and think they are alot faster they they really are? heck id be a low 12 second 116mph car there LOL
#38
Banned
iTrader: (3)
I can see the short gear being the reason for the dragging if they ran em to 140+ but they only went to 120. That was a wayyy harder than a 2mph pull if indeed his car traps 122.
Ive raced a c/i ls2 c6 that traps 125 and he didnt pull me no where near as bad as he pulled that Mach and I trap 118. Heres the video. Take into consideration that he red lighted and got a .300 jump on me.
Ive raced a c/i ls2 c6 that traps 125 and he didnt pull me no where near as bad as he pulled that Mach and I trap 118. Heres the video. Take into consideration that he red lighted and got a .300 jump on me.
Edit: Just read all the comments, yep seems ALOT more believable now I was thinking "god damn 119mph trap, ****". OP's car is definitely a freak, i saw more of his vids his car BOOKS for what it is.
Last edited by adamantium; 03-26-2012 at 11:07 AM.
#39
:beer:
And here is mine
o/r H, catback, shifter
mods in sig (all my times are full weight also)
So you can look at both of our slips and come to conclude that your car at a different track should trap around 113mph while cammed. Just pointing that out and the video concludes seeing as how Zborg probably has a true 120mph car. Not sure what the big deal is.
And here is mine
o/r H, catback, shifter
mods in sig (all my times are full weight also)
So you can look at both of our slips and come to conclude that your car at a different track should trap around 113mph while cammed. Just pointing that out and the video concludes seeing as how Zborg probably has a true 120mph car. Not sure what the big deal is.