Street Demons 3 teaser- fast cars & slow cops
04-25-2012, 07:36 PM
#1
Street Demons 3 teaser- fast cars & slow cops .
.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmUApeDqjmw
EDIT: Before anyone else mentions something about the plates not being blurred, the cars without blurred plates were not doing anything illegal, thus no blur is needed.
.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmUApeDqjmw
EDIT: Before anyone else mentions something about the plates not being blurred, the cars without blurred plates were not doing anything illegal, thus no blur is needed.
Last edited by WSsick; 04-25-2012 at 07:53 PM.
Trending Topics
04-25-2012, 11:35 PM
#11
He went to the track tonight, no cage so couldn't make many full passes but I think he best of the night I heard was 11.0@120 missing 5th and spinning bad. It made 605rwhp @ 8psi which was at like 6k rpms. They took it up to ~7k on the same pulley and made 10psi, think it was like 630+.
04-25-2012, 11:38 PM
#13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=it6Qz...ayer_embedded#!
You forgot this video....
2012 Mustang GT 5.0 - Vortech t-trim @ 10 psi, longtubes, exhaust (made 605rwhp on 8psi), big & skinnies with a 28" slick out back
98 Camaro SS- LS2, longtubes, exhaust, intake, 4000 stall, street tires
You forgot this video....
2012 Mustang GT 5.0 - Vortech t-trim @ 10 psi, longtubes, exhaust (made 605rwhp on 8psi), big & skinnies with a 28" slick out back
98 Camaro SS- LS2, longtubes, exhaust, intake, 4000 stall, street tires
04-26-2012, 09:47 AM
#14
Basically 300+rwhp extra??? I think the Camaro did damn good for being bolt-ons on street tires, and again, down 300+rwhp. 
We did that race for fun, they were out doing some testing and just wanted to give them something to compare it to. Cool guys, and the outcome was already known.
04-26-2012, 10:52 AM
#15
I didn't "forget it"...why bother posting a race that that totally lopsided? Basically 300+rwhp extra??? I think the Camaro did damn good for being bolt-ons on street tires, and again, down 300+rwhp.
We did that race for fun, they were out doing some testing and just wanted to give them something to compare it to. Cool guys, and the outcome was already known.
Basically 300+rwhp extra??? I think the Camaro did damn good for being bolt-ons on street tires, and again, down 300+rwhp. We did that race for fun, they were out doing some testing and just wanted to give them something to compare it to. Cool guys, and the outcome was already known.
04-26-2012, 11:17 AM
#16
The mustang drive has a lot of pratice yet you can tell. Launching it and what not. Some spinning and hitting gear on few of the launches. And did good? It got rapped and pulled more and more. LOL And agree we already knew how the outcome would go. But anything can happen. The stang miss a gear or have the worse launch ever...lol
The owner of the 5.0 is a cool guy, he and the guy that built it both said the Camaro did good, so I'll take their word over some fanboy's.
04-26-2012, 11:32 AM
#17
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In Uranus!
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, did good CONSIDERING HE WAS DOWN 300+RWHP. You really are short a few braincells. That, and you have your head so far up the Coyote's *** you can't even asknowledge the Camaro holding it's ground decent for how lopsided the race was. Obviously he ran the **** away and freight trained the Camaro, BUT HE SHOULD. Sometimes I really wonder about you...I'll have to line up a race with a friend's bolt-on 5.0 losing to a 700rwhp car. Can't wait to hear you bitching about "well it should walk away."
The owner of the 5.0 is a cool guy, he and the guy that built it both said the Camaro did good, so I'll take their word over some fanboy's.
The owner of the 5.0 is a cool guy, he and the guy that built it both said the Camaro did good, so I'll take their word over some fanboy's.
04-26-2012, 04:58 PM
#19
12 Second Club
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Meadville, PA
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
