LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Cam Only C5z vs Cam Only Frc vs Pullied Cobra vs 12 Bolton GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2013, 03:00 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mr.Lsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cam Only C5z vs Cam Only Frc vs Pullied Cobra vs 12 Bolton GT
Mr.Lsx is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 03:37 AM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
6PntHo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Good runs.
6PntHo is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 07:09 AM
  #3  
Staging Lane
 
Knight-Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: san antonio
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
good runs , its crazy how much the z06 beat the frc by , im guessing better intake ls6 heads and a more agressive cam had the most to do with it
Knight-Z06 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 08:20 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default
Great runs...
ohioborn80 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 08:37 AM
  #5  
Teching In
 
Hanlon's Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by Knight-Z06
good runs , its crazy how much the z06 beat the frc by , im guessing better intake ls6 heads and a more agressive cam had the most to do with it
LS6 intake and LS6 heads is probably good for ~60+whp on that FRC, especially cammed.
Hanlon's Law is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 08:43 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
R6cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 835
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by Knight-Z06
good runs , its crazy how much the z06 beat the frc by , im guessing better intake ls6 heads and a more agressive cam had the most to do with it
A little better gearing with the Z06 too. Not to just knock on Cobras, but what I thought was even more crazy is the Cobra with 100+whp could barely edge out the FRC.

Anyways, nice rides and good runs!
R6cowboy is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 08:54 AM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by R6cowboy
A little better gearing with the Z06 too. Not to just knock on Cobras, but what I thought was even more crazy is the Cobra with 100+whp could barely edge out the FRC.

Anyways, nice rides and good runs!
This. Even the GT under performed for the power IMO.
adamantium is offline  
Reply Like

Trending Topics

Old 08-18-2013, 09:09 AM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default
HHow did the gt underperforme? It had slight pull on the cobra who had 43whp more. With just bolt ons. Would have pulled the way lighter FRC harder.
ohioborn80 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 09:40 AM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mr.Lsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
The frc makes crazy low power for some reason its traps 118! It runs for 356whp
Mr.Lsx is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 09:46 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default
Great races! Damn new 5.0's never cease to amaze me lol
HCI2000SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 10:03 AM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
R6cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 835
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by Mr.Lsx
The frc makes crazy low power for some reason its traps 118! It runs for 356whp
118, hot damn for 356whp. Low reading dyno for sure. Goes to show dyno #s don't mean squat.
R6cowboy is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 10:15 AM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mr.Lsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by R6cowboy
118, hot damn for 356whp. Low reading dyno for sure. Goes to show dyno #s don't mean squat.
No that was on average dyno! Has ls6 intake too. My car made 420 on the lowest reading dyno in kentucky
Mr.Lsx is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 10:16 AM
  #13  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by ohioborn80
HHow did the gt underperforme? It had slight pull on the cobra who had 43whp more. With just bolt ons. Would have pulled the way lighter FRC harder.
Because it would've gone door to door with a mid 3xxwhp frc.
adamantium is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 10:29 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
R6cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 835
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by Mr.Lsx
No that was on average dyno! Has ls6 intake too. My car made 420 on the lowest reading dyno in kentucky
228r, vararam, headers, full exhaust, LS6 intake & dyno tuned= 356whp thru a M6. I think most would agree, that its not real low, but still a little low on the whp numbers. That's a good thing though in my book.
R6cowboy is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 10:34 AM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mr.Lsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by adamantium
Because it would've gone door to door with a mid 3xxwhp frc.
Lol 5.0 owners are blind to the truth! 356 vs 430 id hope it edge!
Mr.Lsx is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 10:35 AM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mr.Lsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by R6cowboy
228r, vararam, headers, full exhaust, LS6 intake & dyno tuned= 356whp thru a M6. I think most would agree, that its not real low, but still a little low on the whp numbers. That's a good thing though in my book.
Car made 326 before cam and ls6 intake! Has always perform well! If he throw on show 243s itd be a hoss
Mr.Lsx is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 01:58 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Cool runs being a vert hurt the cobra some.
automach1 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 05:56 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
This site and its Dyno racing.... guarentee every car was on a diff dyno at a diff time. If using different dynos... they are irrelevant.

On another note... great races.
evangto87 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 06:07 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by adamantium
Because it would've gone door to door with a mid 3xxwhp frc.
A dyno numbers means **** in long run. Kinda like how a 528whp n/a 5.0 only ran in mid 12's last night in dallas. As a bolt on 5.0 ran 10.9. And a blown boss ran mid 10's with over 600whp. . Hell everyone even saying it reading low and runs better for its numbers. So a cammed bolt on bigger cubic inch engine that makes crappy dyno numbers. Weighs 600lbs os so less. Nope still would pulled the FRC worse then cobra did.
ohioborn80 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-18-2013, 06:18 PM
  #20  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by ohioborn80
A dyno numbers means **** in long run. Kinda like how a 528whp n/a 5.0 only ran in mid 12's last night in dallas. As a bolt on 5.0 ran 10.9. And a blown boss ran mid 10's with over 600whp. . Hell everyone even saying it reading low and runs better for its numbers. So a cammed bolt on bigger cubic inch engine that makes crappy dyno numbers. Weighs 600lbs os so less. Nope still would pulled the FRC worse then cobra did.
No one said this dyno reads low...


This car makes like 20whp less than what that setup in a f-body would make which is expected being that its in a vette. Its a shitty *** 228r cam only car. At the end of the day the vette was still the fastest car in the video
adamantium is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Cam Only C5z vs Cam Only Frc vs Pullied Cobra vs 12 Bolton GT


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.