Cammed SS vs Turbo M3. *Video from M3 Boys*
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cammed SS vs Turbo M3. *Video from M3 Boys*
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...56537412684082
Video is pretty close. Its missing two races my car absolutely destroyed his.
My heads are factory. Tires were 315 drag radials.
Video is pretty close. Its missing two races my car absolutely destroyed his.
My heads are factory. Tires were 315 drag radials.
#2
Originally Posted by ineedashortblock
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...56537412684082
Video is pretty close. Its missing two races my car absolutely destroyed his.
My heads are factory. Tires were 315 drag radials.
Video is pretty close. Its missing two races my car absolutely destroyed his.
My heads are factory. Tires were 315 drag radials.
#5
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by obrien24
I couldn't see any race where the m3 won
He did pull 3/4ths of a car from the 40 punch. My car is around 3200 rpms from there in second gear I do believe. Doesn't pick up like it needs to.
On the dig, when my car hit second you can hear the rpms hang sort of like the clutch was slipping, but then you can hear it chatter... rear tires were spinning and hopping around.
#7
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern VA
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HOSS
I saw one where the M3 won, car looks quick. Camera needs to be in the cars racing, hard to tell **** from behind.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by HOSS
I saw one where the M3 won, car looks quick. Camera needs to be in the cars racing, hard to tell **** from behind.
Last edited by wickedwarlock; 09-13-2006 at 12:51 PM.
#10
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: nyc
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ineedashortblock
He did pull 3/4ths of a car from the 40 punch. My car is around 3200 rpms from there in second gear I do believe. Doesn't pick up like it needs to.
You should be spinning more than that IIRC
#13
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Car RamRod
With 4:11's?
You should be spinning more than that IIRC
You should be spinning more than that IIRC
Correction, 3900 rpms.
" 2 7.32 61.0 3935"
First is the gear, second is the final drive in second gear, third is the mph @ 6000, and the last is the rpms @ 40 mph.
#14
Sounds like somone is pissy because a CAM only america junk is pulling away from there high auto mobile.
Not hooking up isnt a good reason, you go tell that to the poor FWD guys and they will agree u cant hook u lose.
Not hooking up isnt a good reason, you go tell that to the poor FWD guys and they will agree u cant hook u lose.
#15
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ineedashortblock
Futral FM14.
Last edited by Cam02ss; 09-13-2006 at 06:38 PM.
#17
That's what she said...
iTrader: (8)
F14 from 40 with stock heads in 2nd gear, even with 4.11's sucks, I knows.
http://www.f-body.org/gears/
Use that to figure out speed/rpms, it's pretty neat. Looks like some crying *** bitches to me.
BTW - F14 specs are 232/234 .598 on either 112lsa or 114lsa.
http://www.f-body.org/gears/
Use that to figure out speed/rpms, it's pretty neat. Looks like some crying *** bitches to me.
BTW - F14 specs are 232/234 .598 on either 112lsa or 114lsa.
#20
Originally Posted by emerica4601
m3's are rwd
No ****, I mean to say since fwd cars are always loosing because of traction problems, maybe he should look to them for advice to much power does you no good.
Its all wasted powerd, I bet that euro crap is rock 35series side wall or some skinny *** **** tire.
Throw a Nitto DR on that car if you want to play around with the big boys.