TA vs GT
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TA vs GT
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/3...9d00180906.htm
This guy is a buddy of mine. he was pretty bummed when I beat him. However, the car is in terrible need of a tune. It should be much much closer once he gets that done. Still though, i was proud.
btw.... posted ehre because i couldnt find a vid section. im new here, is there one?
This guy is a buddy of mine. he was pretty bummed when I beat him. However, the car is in terrible need of a tune. It should be much much closer once he gets that done. Still though, i was proud.
btw.... posted ehre because i couldnt find a vid section. im new here, is there one?
#7
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by baldwintpenguin
Not too suprising....take a look at the mods compared to what that year of 5.0 was putting out. Hes gonna need NOS or some kinda FI to keep up once you get a couple bolt ons
Trending Topics
#9
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, i have the same SN over there too. Long time member. I drove a 00 GT for the last 2 years. Full bolt ons and Nitrous. but a semi had its way with me last month..... but I think i came out ahead
Last edited by SpecterGT260; 12-21-2006 at 10:27 AM.
#11
I dont think he is going to get you even with a tune, he is probably making less horsepower than you. his combo is very minor. I think he should of gone with 4.10's instead of 3.73's. but still both great cars and awesome races.
I would like to see a vid of after tune races. please post when you do thanks
I would like to see a vid of after tune races. please post when you do thanks
#12
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AROD427
I dont think he is going to get you even with a tune, he is probably making less horsepower than you. his combo is very minor. I think he should of gone with 4.10's instead of 3.73's. but still both great cars and awesome races.
I would like to see a vid of after tune races. please post when you do thanks
I would like to see a vid of after tune races. please post when you do thanks
#14
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpecterGT260
all 5.0's mod about the same. his issues are that he is SN95 (heavier by about 400 lbs) and his tune is way off. its not uncommon for tuned HCI 5.0s to trap around 110-112, especially when they have the suspension to back it up. I was waaaaaaay surprised by the results. From what I know of his setup and my experience with those cars, I think he stands to gain quite a bit with a dyno tune. Im thinkin hell take the next set of races.... but then again.... Im modding too
#15
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
94-98 GT is about 3350lbs, and a late-model foxbody GT is ~3150-3200lbs. So it's more like a 150-200lb difference. Unless you're talking about a mid 80s foxbody, or a notchback.
and thanks 2k1. I looked around for awhile but i couldnt find a vid section..... probably looked right over it.
#16
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well everything I've seen has the 4cyl notchback being the only 87-93 Stang under 3,000lbs, so I'd venture to say an estimation of 3150-3200lbs for a GT hatch is fairly accurate.
#17
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont want to start a pissing match, but I just came here from the world of mustangs. Ive seen em on the scales. the foxes are lighter than advertised, and the SN95s were a little heavier. the 89 5.0 notch was right around 2900
Last edited by SpecterGT260; 12-21-2006 at 07:50 PM.
#18
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I'm in the world of Mustangs right now... comparing anything other than widely-accepted numbers is kinda pointless. I know that notches are usually 2900-2950lbs, but GTs were a good 150lbs heavier.
#20
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cuz the 400lb weight difference is exaggerated... it's not even a 400lb weight difference between a '93 notchback 5.0, and a '94 coupe 5.0.
Last edited by Irunelevens; 12-21-2006 at 07:50 PM.