Go Back   LS1TECH > CHASSIS, SUSPENSION, APPEARANCE > Suspension & Brakes
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register iTraderTimeslips Photos Members Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Used CarsVendor Directory
Search

Suspension & Brakes
Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors
Sponsored by
Weld Racing

Welcome to LS1Tech.com!
Welcome to LS1Tech.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join LS1Tech.com today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-19-2007, 11:30 AM   #21
TECH Fanatic
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Galveston, TX
Posts: 1,203
Send a message via AIM to 3.4camaro
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Proud2bSS
The manual transmission was designed to be removed 1st from the bell housing, then 2nd remove the bell housing from the block. This is per Hayes GM manuals.

It works really well this way and saves a bunch of hassles.

I just took the whole bitch out at once. My only complaint is the O2 sensor sometimes gets in the way.


ANYways, we do have muscle cars. Muscle cars should vibrate. Solids win.
__________________
!Cats | !PCV | !EGR | !AIR | !CAGS | !EVAP
3.4camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 08:30 PM   #22
TECH Addict
Garage is empty, add now
 
SpdFrk1990's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,572
Send a message via AIM to SpdFrk1990
Default

Solid mounts are just crazy the bushing is there for a reason. I have poly and dont see any reason anyone would need solids unless you had a very high hp drag car.
__________________
1998 Subaru Legacy GT limited (daily driver)
1995 Mazda Miata 36k miles
2001 Camaro SS #2855 M6 26k miles -- Sold
1990 Camaro RS M5
FQuick
SpdFrk1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 08:45 PM   #23
TECH Fanatic
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Galveston, TX
Posts: 1,203
Send a message via AIM to 3.4camaro
Default

That seems like a very uneducated post. You don't own a car with solid mounts, so you should not comment on them, unless you are commenting on price.

Spohn claims a slight advantage of HP because there is no tossing and turning of the engine. They claim this puts more power to the ground. I really love my solid mounts.

I have yet to hear of ONE person who had/has solid mounts that doesn't like them.

EDIT- the bushing is there for the same reason the car doesn't have 500hp, so I can change it.
__________________
!Cats | !PCV | !EGR | !AIR | !CAGS | !EVAP
3.4camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 08:52 PM   #24
TECH Addict
Garage is empty, add now
 
SpdFrk1990's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,572
Send a message via AIM to SpdFrk1990
Default

Ok with no bushing there to soak up some movement that has to put more stress on the drivetrain I dont have to own them to know that. I had a car with just some stiff poly mounts b4 also and it was terrible so I was even worried about getting them on this car. Now on a ls1 they might not be bad as far as the vibration but with my stock tranny and 10bolt im sticking with the polys.
__________________
1998 Subaru Legacy GT limited (daily driver)
1995 Mazda Miata 36k miles
2001 Camaro SS #2855 M6 26k miles -- Sold
1990 Camaro RS M5
FQuick
SpdFrk1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 09:01 PM   #25
TECH Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 24
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,157
Send a message via AIM to Reject
Default

did alittle more tuning and the car is acting a whole lot nicer with the solids, feels almost stock now!
__________________


2000 Z28 | 2003 Z06 | 2004.5 DMax
Reject is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 09:05 PM   #26
TECH Fanatic
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Galveston, TX
Posts: 1,203
Send a message via AIM to 3.4camaro
Default

I disagree with the "adding stress to the drivetrain" for this reason: rubber and poly mounts allow binding of the drivetrain. This means the engine is moving. I put solid mounts on the car, a poly tranny mount, a body mounted torque arm(rod-ended), tubular LCAs(poly) and relocation brackets. My drivetrain does not move at all, and there is no articulation. This puts the most power to the ground and will cause less wear and tear on the tranny mount and LCAs because they wont move, either. Movement of bushings cause wear.
__________________
!Cats | !PCV | !EGR | !AIR | !CAGS | !EVAP
3.4camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 09:09 PM   #27
TECH Addict
Garage is empty, add now
 
SpdFrk1990's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,572
Send a message via AIM to SpdFrk1990
Default

I wouldnt say the movement the motor makes is binding really but if you like them im not trying to change your mind I just know I like the polys.
__________________
1998 Subaru Legacy GT limited (daily driver)
1995 Mazda Miata 36k miles
2001 Camaro SS #2855 M6 26k miles -- Sold
1990 Camaro RS M5
FQuick
SpdFrk1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 11:25 PM   #28
TECH Fanatic
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Galveston, TX
Posts: 1,203
Send a message via AIM to 3.4camaro
Default

I'm sure you love your poly's, but you are commenting and speculating on something you don't have firsthand experience with. I'm in favor of solid mounts for the weight savings and race car feel, and I SPECULATE they don't vibrate anymore than poly mounts, based on the reviews I've read on this board.

I want to dispel myths on here about solid mounts and explain their benefits. Most people here that bash solid mounts have never had them on their car.
__________________
!Cats | !PCV | !EGR | !AIR | !CAGS | !EVAP
3.4camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 06:43 AM   #29
On The Tree
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 14
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 156
Default

When I put my poly's in, they didn't line up very well. Instead of fighting the motor, I took the mount back out, put it in the vise and pushed the metal tube over to get it to line up better. It took me all of 10 mins to bend it and get all four bolts in. PM if you need more details, but it is an easy fix to a common problem.
__________________
.
.
1999 Camaro Z28 M6 with '03 LS6 transplant

Lid/filter, P&P TB, Pacesetter LT's, ORY, Hooker exhaust, LCA's on brackets.
Thorny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 09:32 PM   #30
Teching In
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 48
Default

May have missed it but...

Can these mounts be a butt to put it? How long does it take? Whats the best way to do it?

I make about 400 RWHP with a cam and someother things..The car idles so rough with rubber bushings I figure either poly or solid would absorb it. I'm surprised the rubber bushing aren't shot yet..
__________________
02' Camaro SS
SM #64
www.tamscc.org
NU_BLUE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 09:52 PM   #31
TECH Fanatic
Garage is empty, add now
 
PowerShift408's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 42
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,737
Send a message via AIM to PowerShift408
Default

I have poly's now and love them. But when I get me a new K-Member, it'll be solids for sure. Either is a 1000x better than stock mounts though, especially if your car is cammed.
PowerShift408 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 10:01 PM   #32
TECH Apprentice
Garage is empty, add now
 
sapper_daddy's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 12
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerShift408
I have poly's now and love them. But when I get me a new K-Member, it'll be solids for sure. Either is a 1000x better than stock mounts though, especially if your car is cammed.
Man I just put together my front end with Energy suspension bushings, moog chasis parts, and went back with prothane motor mounts, I feel the motor a little more at idle, I'm not sure about the solids but if I go tubular like you are, in the future Im going to try solids. No matter how much HP you have I think a nasty cam on solid mounts is a sure fire way to get a woody....just throwing that out there
__________________
2001 SS Onyx Black on Ebony M6 on Koni SA SOLD

Quote:
Originally Posted by ICEMAN 31
hell if I could I would do 90 out of the driveway......stupid short *** driveway.
sapper_daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 02:37 AM   #33
TECH Fanatic
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 26
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SIU School of Dental Medicine
Posts: 1,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NU_BLUE
May have missed it but...

Can these mounts be a butt to put it? How long does it take? Whats the best way to do it?

I make about 400 RWHP with a cam and someother things..The car idles so rough with rubber bushings I figure either poly or solid would absorb it. I'm surprised the rubber bushing aren't shot yet..

yeah, they are a pain in the *** to change. i would have someone else there to help you.
__________________
Location: Staunton, IL 62088

2000 Camaro Z28 A4
cals400ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 09:22 AM   #34
Staging Lane
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 54
Send a message via AIM to Prediluted
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cals400ex View Post
yeah, they are a pain in the *** to change. i would have someone else there to help you.
Def have some help.

When I did poly ones in my 94 T/a I couldn't get it to line up for the life of me at first. Spent about 6-7 hours trying to get the driver's side to work for me and then just gave up for the day. Figured out that my problem was that the car wasn't sitting completely level. I just put a carpenter's level on my intake, leveled it out best I could (my driveway is crooked, most of the problem) and worked like a charm. Got the driver's side in, passenger's side out and new one in, took me 1.5-2 hrs once it was leveled out.

Another thought: it may seem obvious, but only do one side at a time if you are doing it with the engine in the car. I have heard of people making the mistake of taking out both of the old motor mounts before starting the new ones, and then it becomes much more difficult. Do one at a time and save yourself some aggravation
__________________
2006 Corolla: The current DD

2001 Camaro SS: SLP Lid, SLP LM2, Chrs1313 w/ AC, K&N Filter, UMI STB, LCA, & PHB SOLD 8/2011

1994 Trans Am: K&N CAI, Pacesetter LT, Magnaflow Catback, CRASHED 3/2009

Looking for a low mileage GTO!
Prediluted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 03:37 PM   #35
11 Second Club
Garage is empty, add now
 
jerflash's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 1,429
Send a message via AIM to jerflash
Default

im still on my stock mounts here...i was thinking about changing them out but to tell you the truth the extra vibration and shake is not worth it for a street strip car. i had poly mounts in my 89 and they sucked
__________________
TOY: 2002 RED/EBONY M6 WS6
FORGED 347, F13, TFS 220 AS CAST, FAST 90, ARH 1 7/8" HEADERS & Y, DUAL DMH LOW PRO CUTOUTS, MONSTER STAGE 3, RSG BUILT T56, PST 3.5" ALUM DS, MIDWEST M9 AND REAR SUSPENSION, HALS ALL AROUND.
Daily Driver: 2007 E92 328xi Space Gray w/ Coral Red/Black Int.
jerflash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 03:40 PM   #36
FormerVendor
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 209
Default

The energy transfer alone with Solids Vs. is amazing!

I vote solids...

-Nathan
StuartsPNB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 10:05 PM   #37
12 Second Club
Garage is empty, add now
 
ShortChevy's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 19
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Muskegon, MI
Posts: 1,102
Send a message via AIM to ShortChevy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3.4camaro View Post
I'm sure you love your poly's, but you are commenting and speculating on something you don't have firsthand experience with. I'm in favor of solid mounts for the weight savings and race car feel, and I SPECULATE they don't vibrate anymore than poly mounts, based on the reviews I've read on this board.

I want to dispel myths on here about solid mounts and explain their benefits. Most people here that bash solid mounts have never had them on their car.
I'm with this guy. I put my solids in about 5 or 6 months ago when I put headers in (made the header install a breeze, I could drive a Mack through there.) I love them, car does vibe a bit at idle, not a big deal at all. It is at it's worst when it's cold and the idle is just a bit higher, about the sweet spot to make it vibe. Warmed up they are all but gone. I love how the car shakes and rocks. Along with being lighter I do not see how they could put stress on the rest of the drivetrian. If anything they should be relieving stress becouse nothing aft of the engine is able to move or twist. (besides the rear upwards of coarse.) Also after the install I noticed the car hooked and squated better. Only thing I could think of is it removed the shock of the engine and trans rocking over that would normally help break the tires loose. I have made a believer out of a couple of friends who told me I was stupid for putting them in a street driven car. After a few rides they agreed that the vibes are about the same as stock.
__________________

98 Formula A4, Street Tires, Some Bolt On's, Runs on Moonshine, Smells like a Distillery...
12.05 @ 115.53 with a 1.94 60' (Damn street tires)
Tuned by TJ, Baker Engineering, Inc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkvamso View Post
Top fuel dragsters dont have springs and torque arms or lower control arms, but they do have 7000 hp and they run 3's
More power is better
ShortChevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 10:02 AM   #38
TECH Apprentice
Garage is empty, add now
 
SantaCruz163's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 299
Default

My only beef with running solid mounts would be 1) access to transmission & bellhousing bolts and 2) I don't believe an aftermarket K-member can be used with solids. Other than those, I'd be all for running solids.
__________________
1999 TR FRC
SantaCruz163 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 11:44 AM   #39
12 Second Club
Garage is empty, add now
 
ShortChevy's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 19
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Muskegon, MI
Posts: 1,102
Send a message via AIM to ShortChevy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SantaCruz163 View Post
My only beef with running solid mounts would be 1) access to transmission & bellhousing bolts and 2) I don't believe an aftermarket K-member can be used with solids. Other than those, I'd be all for running solids.
As for the access to the bolts it's really not a big issue. Either loosen the bolts and drop the K member a little bit or remove the bolts in the M/Ms while leaving the rear-most two on each side allowing you to pivot just like stock. As for the aftermarket K, I do believe you can run the Spohn K with them.
__________________

98 Formula A4, Street Tires, Some Bolt On's, Runs on Moonshine, Smells like a Distillery...
12.05 @ 115.53 with a 1.94 60' (Damn street tires)
Tuned by TJ, Baker Engineering, Inc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkvamso View Post
Top fuel dragsters dont have springs and torque arms or lower control arms, but they do have 7000 hp and they run 3's
More power is better
ShortChevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 09:31 PM   #40
On The Tree
2000 Pontiac Trans Am
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 126
Default

Well, this is an old *** thread... but so are my motor mounts so I suppose i'll ask. Is there any advantage in installation between the two? (poly vs. solids)

Seems that the solids would be slightly easier
__________________
2000 Trans Am M6 - Sold
1990 240lsx in the making
Brian'sCharlotte(TA) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 09:31 PM
LS1Tech
Pontiac Firebird




Paid Advertisement
Reply

Tags
2000, benefit, camaro, engine, ls1, lt1, moog, motor, mount, mounts, poly, solid, ss, tranny, vibration


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.2
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details