10's for my bolt-on ls6!!
11-26-2014, 06:37 PM
#241
11-26-2014, 06:59 PM
#242
Banned
iTrader: (1)
!["MAC"'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%237f3b59' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>"</text></svg>)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im waiting on proof if you have no proof (which seems like the case) then i guess that makes you stupid. After all at the end of the day it just makes you look like you are saying your opinion. You provided no factual evidence to back your opinion up.
11-26-2014, 07:21 PM
#246
Please pull up that proof Macadelic. You ******' idiot.
Where is your proof that Hio indeed nailed a 1.2 60ft? His timeslip isn't proof because it's false. False documents cannot be used as proof you inbred child.
11-26-2014, 07:25 PM
#247
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mac, pull up a link of another car identical to Hio's that indeed nailed a 1.2 60' please.
Please pull up that proof Macadelic. You ******' idiot.
Where is your proof that Hio indeed nailed a 1.2 60ft? His timeslip isn't proof because it's false. False documents cannot be used as proof you inbred child.
Please pull up that proof Macadelic. You ******' idiot.
Where is your proof that Hio indeed nailed a 1.2 60ft? His timeslip isn't proof because it's false. False documents cannot be used as proof you inbred child.
11-26-2014, 07:27 PM
#248
11-26-2014, 07:33 PM
#249
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You haven't provided any proof and i asked you to first. So until you provide factual evidence to support your claim then you can stfu. This thread would be better off if you did.
11-26-2014, 07:39 PM
#250
Once you find a car identical to Hio's that has nailed a real 1.2 60ft, ill shut up. Until then, you're a ******* retard to the fullest.
11-26-2014, 07:40 PM
#251
At a open TnT day, making passes back to back. The car has the same tires, same gears, same launch rpm, same shock setting, ride height, suspension angles. Every thing about the car is the same, you drove it there and drove it home..... so your going some high 10's on 1.5 60's with whatever HP (420ish). Now you add the hp it takes for the car to "do" (go 60' in 1.2sec) it. Lets say 850... to play it safe give it 950whp (stock LS6?). So you pull the car back up, stage it, let the clutch out at the same rpm, same tires, suspension setting. What do you think is going to happen.
How stupid dose that sound. hahaha. It sure as **** isnt going to "hook", jam the tire but control it, and roll out all bad *** like a 7sec car would do it.
The other side would be you did a few changes on your shocks (some bolt on shocks out of summit racing i bet), some how you have a tune up (to double the power) and change the suspension (bolt on LCA relco? haha) on the same car with the same parts you drove to the track and home. That will go 1.5s all day normally. But then it will "just hooks and felt faster and was in front of the other car" in a different tune up and legit go 1.2s (even if the rest the pass after that is wrong too). You would have a dual setting car larry larson would be impressed to figure out.
The NASA/ESA Rosetta mission, landing the probe on the comet going 40 million mile per hour, or whatever was easier to do then hiho silvers camaro with bolt on LS6 with a t56 that gose 1.5s to a 1.2 60, one pass later
11-26-2014, 07:42 PM
#252
having the power to "do" it. is a very small part of the "do" it part.
At a open TnT day, making passes back to back. The car has the same tires, same gears, same launch rpm, same shock setting, ride height, suspension angles. Every thing about the car is the same, you drove it there and drove it home..... so your going some high 10's on 1.5 60's with whatever HP (420ish). Now you add the hp it takes for the car to "do" (go 60' in 1.2sec) it. Lets say 850... to play it safe give it 950whp (stock LS6?). So you pull the car back up, stage it, let the clutch out at the same rpm, same tires, suspension setting. What do you think is going to happen.
How stupid dose that sound. hahaha. It sure as **** isnt going to "hook", jam the tire but control it, and roll out all bad *** like a 7sec car would do it.
The other side would be you did a few changes on your shocks (some bolt on shocks out of summit racing i bet), some how you have a tune up (to double the power) and change the suspension (bolt on LCA relco? haha) on the same car with the same parts you drove to the track and home. That will go 1.5s all day normally. But then it will "just hooks and felt faster and was in front of the other car" in a different tune up and legit go 1.2s (even if the rest the pass after that is wrong too). You would have a dual setting car larry larson would be impressed to figure out.
The NASA/ESA Rosetta mission, landing the probe on the comet going 40 million mile per hour, or whatever was easier to do then hiho silvers camaro with bolt on LS6 with a t56 that gose 1.5s to a 1.2 60, one pass later
At a open TnT day, making passes back to back. The car has the same tires, same gears, same launch rpm, same shock setting, ride height, suspension angles. Every thing about the car is the same, you drove it there and drove it home..... so your going some high 10's on 1.5 60's with whatever HP (420ish). Now you add the hp it takes for the car to "do" (go 60' in 1.2sec) it. Lets say 850... to play it safe give it 950whp (stock LS6?). So you pull the car back up, stage it, let the clutch out at the same rpm, same tires, suspension setting. What do you think is going to happen.
How stupid dose that sound. hahaha. It sure as **** isnt going to "hook", jam the tire but control it, and roll out all bad *** like a 7sec car would do it.
The other side would be you did a few changes on your shocks (some bolt on shocks out of summit racing i bet), some how you have a tune up (to double the power) and change the suspension (bolt on LCA relco? haha) on the same car with the same parts you drove to the track and home. That will go 1.5s all day normally. But then it will "just hooks and felt faster and was in front of the other car" in a different tune up and legit go 1.2s (even if the rest the pass after that is wrong too). You would have a dual setting car larry larson would be impressed to figure out.
The NASA/ESA Rosetta mission, landing the probe on the comet going 40 million mile per hour, or whatever was easier to do then hiho silvers camaro with bolt on LS6 with a t56 that gose 1.5s to a 1.2 60, one pass later
11-26-2014, 07:48 PM
#254
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh because you asked me first? Are we back in third grade? Lol. "No! I asked you first!" Hahaha you're a joke Mac. You literally don't know a single thing about cars or racing. Funny thing is, you think you're not admitting stupidity but with every single post you make, everyone on this forum can see how ******* stupid you are. So sheepish of you. You're blind. You're ignorant, stubborn, and uneducated.
Once you find a car identical to Hio's that has nailed a real 1.2 60ft, ill shut up. Until then, you're a ******* retard to the fullest.
11-26-2014, 07:51 PM
#255
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
having the power to "do" it. is a very small part of the "do" it part.
At a open TnT day, making passes back to back. The car has the same tires, same gears, same launch rpm, same shock setting, ride height, suspension angles. Every thing about the car is the same, you drove it there and drove it home..... so your going some high 10's on 1.5 60's with whatever HP (420ish). Now you add the hp it takes for the car to "do" (go 60' in 1.2sec) it. Lets say 850... to play it safe give it 950whp (stock LS6?). So you pull the car back up, stage it, let the clutch out at the same rpm, same tires, suspension setting. What do you think is going to happen.
How stupid dose that sound. hahaha. It sure as **** isnt going to "hook", jam the tire but control it, and roll out all bad *** like a 7sec car would do it.
The other side would be you did a few changes on your shocks (some bolt on shocks out of summit racing i bet), some how you have a tune up (to double the power) and change the suspension (bolt on LCA relco? haha) on the same car with the same parts you drove to the track and home. That will go 1.5s all day normally. But then it will "just hooks and felt faster and was in front of the other car" in a different tune up and legit go 1.2s (even if the rest the pass after that is wrong too). You would have a dual setting car larry larson would be impressed to figure out.
The NASA/ESA Rosetta mission, landing the probe on the comet going 40 million mile per hour, or whatever was easier to do then hiho silvers camaro with bolt on LS6 with a t56 that gose 1.5s to a 1.2 60, one pass later
11-26-2014, 07:53 PM
#257
What you fail to realize (because you're a dumb inbred) is that the proof you want, there is none. You asked me to show proof without posting a car that has more HP than Hio's....
Hmmmmm, I wonder why? Oh gee! That's right, it's because there isn't a single car in the world that has ever done a 1.2 60ft with only 425rwhp. There is your proof you ******* idiot. Glad to see you can't comprehend such simple terms, smh. No use for you. People like you should be off'd, literally. You have no significance in this world if you can't even evolve/learn/educate yourself. Hang yourself kid.
Hmmmmm, I wonder why? Oh gee! That's right, it's because there isn't a single car in the world that has ever done a 1.2 60ft with only 425rwhp. There is your proof you ******* idiot. Glad to see you can't comprehend such simple terms, smh. No use for you. People like you should be off'd, literally. You have no significance in this world if you can't even evolve/learn/educate yourself. Hang yourself kid.
11-26-2014, 08:03 PM
#258
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What you fail to realize (because you're a dumb inbred) is that the proof you want, there is none. You asked me to show proof without posting a car that has more HP than Hio's....
Hmmmmm, I wonder why? Oh gee! That's right, it's because there isn't a single car in the world that has ever done a 1.2 60ft with only 425rwhp. There is your proof you ******* idiot. Glad to see you can't comprehend such simple terms, smh. No use for you. People like you should be off'd, literally. You have no significance in this world if you can't even evolve/learn/educate yourself. Hang yourself kid.
Hmmmmm, I wonder why? Oh gee! That's right, it's because there isn't a single car in the world that has ever done a 1.2 60ft with only 425rwhp. There is your proof you ******* idiot. Glad to see you can't comprehend such simple terms, smh. No use for you. People like you should be off'd, literally. You have no significance in this world if you can't even evolve/learn/educate yourself. Hang yourself kid.
11-26-2014, 08:19 PM
#260
having the power to "do" it. is a very small part of the "do" it part.
At a open TnT day, making passes back to back. The car has the same tires, same gears, same launch rpm, same shock setting, ride height, suspension angles. Every thing about the car is the same, you drove it there and drove it home..... so your going some high 10's on 1.5 60's with whatever HP (420ish). Now you add the hp it takes for the car to "do" (go 60' in 1.2sec) it. Lets say 850... to play it safe give it 950whp (stock LS6?). So you pull the car back up, stage it, let the clutch out at the same rpm, same tires, suspension setting. What do you think is going to happen.
How stupid dose that sound. hahaha. It sure as **** isnt going to "hook", jam the tire but control it, and roll out all bad *** like a 7sec car would do it.
The other side would be you did a few changes on your shocks (some bolt on shocks out of summit racing i bet), some how you have a tune up (to double the power) and change the suspension (bolt on LCA relco? haha) on the same car with the same parts you drove to the track and home. That will go 1.5s all day normally. But then it will "just hooks and felt faster and was in front of the other car" in a different tune up and legit go 1.2s (even if the rest the pass after that is wrong too). You would have a dual setting car larry larson would be impressed to figure out.
The NASA/ESA Rosetta mission, landing the probe on the comet going 40 million mile per hour, or whatever was easier to do then hiho silvers camaro with bolt on LS6 with a t56 that gose 1.5s to a 1.2 60, one pass later
At a open TnT day, making passes back to back. The car has the same tires, same gears, same launch rpm, same shock setting, ride height, suspension angles. Every thing about the car is the same, you drove it there and drove it home..... so your going some high 10's on 1.5 60's with whatever HP (420ish). Now you add the hp it takes for the car to "do" (go 60' in 1.2sec) it. Lets say 850... to play it safe give it 950whp (stock LS6?). So you pull the car back up, stage it, let the clutch out at the same rpm, same tires, suspension setting. What do you think is going to happen.
How stupid dose that sound. hahaha. It sure as **** isnt going to "hook", jam the tire but control it, and roll out all bad *** like a 7sec car would do it.
The other side would be you did a few changes on your shocks (some bolt on shocks out of summit racing i bet), some how you have a tune up (to double the power) and change the suspension (bolt on LCA relco? haha) on the same car with the same parts you drove to the track and home. That will go 1.5s all day normally. But then it will "just hooks and felt faster and was in front of the other car" in a different tune up and legit go 1.2s (even if the rest the pass after that is wrong too). You would have a dual setting car larry larson would be impressed to figure out.
The NASA/ESA Rosetta mission, landing the probe on the comet going 40 million mile per hour, or whatever was easier to do then hiho silvers camaro with bolt on LS6 with a t56 that gose 1.5s to a 1.2 60, one pass later