11's w/ stock N/A M6 LS1--no heads, cam, or weight reduction?
12-19-2006, 10:38 PM
#41
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mi
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=mattf2]It's a damn shame this knucklehead from Michigan wasn't at Cecil 2 weeks ago, he could have watched me go 116.7, twice, and another guy go 118 in a Z28. Both stock internals. Rev limiter is set at 6400.
The only thing in my engine that didn't come from the factory are the new spark plugs and Mobil 1 5w-40.
If I had an unlimited budget, I'd go w/ 5.13's in a dana 60 and shift into 5th at the 1000'.[/QUOTE
]
Sure it is and sure you did. What people claim and what is fact are to different things. I am not going to debate this crap with you - if others want to believe your statements then so be it.
The only thing in my engine that didn't come from the factory are the new spark plugs and Mobil 1 5w-40.
If I had an unlimited budget, I'd go w/ 5.13's in a dana 60 and shift into 5th at the 1000'.[/QUOTE
]
Sure it is and sure you did. What people claim and what is fact are to different things. I am not going to debate this crap with you - if others want to believe your statements then so be it.
12-20-2006, 02:33 PM
#43
[QUOTE=david vericker]
As someone else said look at the stock internals list and see for yourself...im sure all the guys on the list are lying...
Originally Posted by mattf2
It's a damn shame this knucklehead from Michigan wasn't at Cecil 2 weeks ago, he could have watched me go 116.7, twice, and another guy go 118 in a Z28. Both stock internals. Rev limiter is set at 6400.
The only thing in my engine that didn't come from the factory are the new spark plugs and Mobil 1 5w-40.
If I had an unlimited budget, I'd go w/ 5.13's in a dana 60 and shift into 5th at the 1000'.[/QUOTE
]
Sure it is and sure you did. What people claim and what is fact are to different things. I am not going to debate this crap with you - if others want to believe your statements then so be it.
The only thing in my engine that didn't come from the factory are the new spark plugs and Mobil 1 5w-40.
If I had an unlimited budget, I'd go w/ 5.13's in a dana 60 and shift into 5th at the 1000'.[/QUOTE
]
Sure it is and sure you did. What people claim and what is fact are to different things. I am not going to debate this crap with you - if others want to believe your statements then so be it.
As someone else said look at the stock internals list and see for yourself...im sure all the guys on the list are lying...
12-20-2006, 04:12 PM
#44
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mi
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=98Z28MASS]
As someone else said look at the stock internals list and see for yourself...im sure all the guys on the list are lying... Stock LS1 cam 198/202 500/500 117 @ .50 - stock LS1 heads are adequate at best. All the bolt ons in the world are only worth approximately 35 rwhp. Just how do you think that a stock LS1 engin in a 3600 # F-Body can produce enough HP to trap at 116 - 118 MPH. Please enlighten me .... MPR is 99% HP related.
Or are they really saying stock GM internals - GM Performance makes a lot of after market parts, then that makes it a possibility. But, if their say that the motor( LS1) has never been disassembled, then I find that to be extremely hard to believe.
Originally Posted by david vericker
As someone else said look at the stock internals list and see for yourself...im sure all the guys on the list are lying...
Or are they really saying stock GM internals - GM Performance makes a lot of after market parts, then that makes it a possibility. But, if their say that the motor( LS1) has never been disassembled, then I find that to be extremely hard to believe.
12-20-2006, 04:23 PM
#45
11 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: gilbertsville, PA
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=david vericker]
But, if their say that the motor( LS1) has never been disassembled, then I find that to be extremely hard to believe.
So you're calling me a liar?
I guess you're entitled to your opinion.
52,000 miles. 3 clutches (the McLeod is the only way to go), 1 grenaded (sp?) rear, second set of tires, original brakes. The engine has never been apart. Even has the crappy ls1 intake. Runs better and stronger than ever.
Originally Posted by 98Z28MASS
But, if their say that the motor( LS1) has never been disassembled, then I find that to be extremely hard to believe.
So you're calling me a liar?
I guess you're entitled to your opinion.
52,000 miles. 3 clutches (the McLeod is the only way to go), 1 grenaded (sp?) rear, second set of tires, original brakes. The engine has never been apart. Even has the crappy ls1 intake. Runs better and stronger than ever.
12-20-2006, 04:28 PM
#46
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mi
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=mattf2]
So you're calling me a liar?
I guess you're entitled to your opinion.
52,000 miles. 3 clutches (the McLeod is the only way to go), 1 grenaded (sp?) rear, second set of tires, original brakes. The engine has never been apart. Even has the crappy ls1 intake. Runs better and stronger than ever. Take it for what its worth - you used the word liar,not me. 
Originally Posted by david vericker
So you're calling me a liar?
I guess you're entitled to your opinion.
52,000 miles. 3 clutches (the McLeod is the only way to go), 1 grenaded (sp?) rear, second set of tires, original brakes. The engine has never been apart. Even has the crappy ls1 intake. Runs better and stronger than ever.
12-20-2006, 06:56 PM
#49
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mi
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mattf2
or, maybe someone's jealous that their vette can't beat SI heavier cars without a little help...
12-20-2006, 09:09 PM
#51
You guys are wasting your time.
Quote form this thread
https://ls1tech.com/forums/11-second-club/597585-anyone-running-11-s-camonly-n.html
Face it. Stock internal cars can't hit 11's. It's impossible. I guess he'd really **** to see that my 2.73 geared car made it there stock internal.
Quote form this thread
https://ls1tech.com/forums/11-second-club/597585-anyone-running-11-s-camonly-n.html
Originally Posted by david vericker
I agree with you! A stock LS1 F-Body with bolt on's (no heads or cam) can't produce enough HP to run in the 11 second range. But then again,if I said my pig can fly. There would be plenty of dudes out there claiming their pig could fly higer and faster than mine. It just goes to show that all bullshit is relivent.
I guess he'd really **** to see that my 2.73 geared car made it there stock internal.
12-21-2006, 09:05 AM
#53
Originally Posted by david vericker
Not jealous at all, there are many LS1 cars (Vettes & F-Bodys) that can out run my Vette. However,none of you hotdogs have explained to me where this 116-118 MPH HP comes from - did you just pull it out of your stock *** or do the Drag Strips in PA run down hill??
12-21-2006, 08:07 PM
#54
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mi
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 98Z28MASS
Stock internals means that the internals havent been touched, so people can run built tranny's, 12 bolt/9 inch/dana 60 rear, different gears, sticky tire, weight reduction, headers, true duals/catback, diff suspension, etc...I mean its def not a stock car and if you look at the weights of the cars of the list they are probably lighter than your vette. People dfef arent talking about a stock f-body with a few bolt on running 116-118 mph
12-21-2006, 08:48 PM
#55
Originally Posted by david vericker
Believe what you will. Your so called stock cars are relatively slow anyways - have a good time there bullshiters. Keep posting on this thread you have a lot of know nothings following your every step. Last post period!!
The fact that you are calling us bullshitters......probably a good indicator as to who the "relatively slow" one is. Take care. Drive safe.
12-22-2006, 10:20 AM
#56
Originally Posted by david vericker
Believe what you will. Your so called stock cars are relatively slow anyways - have a good time there bullshiters. Keep posting on this thread you have a lot of know nothings following your every step. Last post period!!
Thank god this idiot isnt going to be posting anymore
12-22-2006, 10:27 AM
#57
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by david vericker
Believe what you will. Your so called stock cars are relatively slow anyways - have a good time there bullshiters. Keep posting on this thread you have a lot of know nothings following your every step. Last post period!!
What part of stock internals do you not understand? Hell, full weight with only a cutout, TSP lid, and a Grantelli meter done to my wifes car it went 109.34... with her driving. I'm sure with all the bolt-ons, stall and a shift kit gaining a measly 7 mph would not be problem getting. You need to get out more. Cause you obviously don't know what LS1's are any car for that matter are capable running.
12-23-2006, 11:54 AM
#59
12 Second Club
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Corpus Christi
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bitemark46
I just realized for the first time I stuck up for an LS1/camaro. I need to go and confess my sins. 
fuerzaws6
12-23-2006, 02:28 PM
#60
11 Second Club
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA-WEST MONROE, LOUISIANA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bitemark46
I just realized for the first time I stuck up for an LS1/camaro. I need to go and confess my sins.