Anyone running 11's Camonly N/A?
11-03-2006, 07:11 PM
#21
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mi
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HottLS1Z
yeah...all these guys saying there in the 11's with STOCK cam and heads must have some serious weight reuction or they are running some form of power adder these cars don go 11 anything with stock heads and cam completly NA stock weight.
11-06-2006, 04:42 PM
#22
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Indy, IN
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
depending on suspension, tires, axle, gearing, weight reduction, and driver all come into effect when wanting to run a fast time.
I went 11.84 @ 117.19 cam only on sunday. I did pull a 1.58 60' time in a 6sp car with a road racing suspension. My car is full weight and I want to keep it that way. I need more seat time. I see that seat time is the best mod for a driver. If you know your setup and have a lot of passes on it then you are going to be consistant and fast.
I went 11.84 @ 117.19 cam only on sunday. I did pull a 1.58 60' time in a 6sp car with a road racing suspension. My car is full weight and I want to keep it that way. I need more seat time. I see that seat time is the best mod for a driver. If you know your setup and have a lot of passes on it then you are going to be consistant and fast.
11-06-2006, 06:42 PM
#24
Originally Posted by david vericker
I agree with you! A stock LS1 F-Body with bolt on's (no heads or cam) can't produce enough HP to run in the 11 second range. But then again,if I said my pig can fly. There would be plenty of dudes out there claiming their pig could fly higer and faster than mine. It just goes to show that all bullshit is relivent.
Spend some time at the strip with the guys running 11's SI.....and then come back and talk ****. It has been done many times.
11-07-2006, 09:08 AM
#26
11 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know what my weight is. The car has everything still in it minus floor mats, jack and spare tire. I'm not a big guy either; I only weigh about 155lbs.
My 60' was a 1.60 (100% stock suspension and ET Streets)
My 60' was a 1.60 (100% stock suspension and ET Streets)
11-08-2006, 07:42 AM
#28
Originally Posted by mwill15
I don't know what my weight is. The car has everything still in it minus floor mats, jack and spare tire. I'm not a big guy either; I only weigh about 155lbs.
My 60' was a 1.60 (100% stock suspension and ET Streets)
My 60' was a 1.60 (100% stock suspension and ET Streets)
Pushing an M6 car to a magazine article perfect 60' is a lot of finess I'm finding out. Guess I need to perform the "seat time" mod and maybe I'll shave a tenth or so off my 60'.
11-08-2006, 08:04 AM
#29
11-09-2006, 11:52 AM
#30
Originally Posted by david vericker
I agree with you! A stock LS1 F-Body with bolt on's (no heads or cam) can't produce enough HP to run in the 11 second range. But then again,if I said my pig can fly. There would be plenty of dudes out there claiming their pig could fly higer and faster than mine. It just goes to show that all bullshit is relivent.
haha been done many times look at sig for details, N/A and still exhaust manifolds, no dyno tune either...
11-10-2006, 07:26 AM
#33
Originally Posted by jay_99z
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/444688-quickest-stock-internals-list-11-80-bump.html
Stock heads and cam, no power adder.....
And I'm not knocking what you're doing.....just showing it can be done. I sported the 2.73's for a long time myself. You can go plenty fast with those gears and still get great gas mileage on road trips.
Stock heads and cam, no power adder.....
And I'm not knocking what you're doing.....just showing it can be done. I sported the 2.73's for a long time myself. You can go plenty fast with those gears and still get great gas mileage on road trips.
Yeah well maybee 4 out of the 50 say they are 3600 which is still not full weight!
11-10-2006, 11:34 AM
#34
Originally Posted by UCNTZME
Yeah well maybee 4 out of the 50 say they are 3600 which is still not full weight!
Ful weight or not it has been done. I don't consider pulling the spare and jack out a major weight reduction. Many have hit 11's with just the those being removed. Personally I ran 11's with full interior, stock wheels, and only weight being removed was spare tire/jack. I guess it doesn't count if you only have a 1/4 tank of gas in too?
Besides.....the original question was about cam only cars hitting 11's. So....add 10 to 15lbs (so it's stock weight) and a cam and I think it's possible.
I think the ones that are calling BS either
1. Don't have the weather/track to hit those times
2. Haven't been around these cars very long
3 Just pissed off because they can't get their heads and cam 400HP cars out of the 12's.
12-17-2006, 01:40 PM
#37
TECH Resident
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jay_99z
I think the ones that are calling BS either
1. Don't have the weather/track to hit those times
2. Haven't been around these cars very long
3 Just pissed off because they can't get their heads and cam 400HP cars out of the 12's.
1. Don't have the weather/track to hit those times
2. Haven't been around these cars very long
3 Just pissed off because they can't get their heads and cam 400HP cars out of the 12's.
12-18-2006, 08:04 AM
#38
Banned
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chitown
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jay_99z
Ful weight or not it has been done. I don't consider pulling the spare and jack out a major weight reduction. Many have hit 11's with just the those being removed. Personally I ran 11's with full interior, stock wheels, and only weight being removed was spare tire/jack. I guess it doesn't count if you only have a 1/4 tank of gas in too?
Besides.....the original question was about cam only cars hitting 11's. So....add 10 to 15lbs (so it's stock weight) and a cam and I think it's possible.
I think the ones that are calling BS either
1. Don't have the weather/track to hit those times
2. Haven't been around these cars very long
3 Just pissed off because they can't get their heads and cam 400HP cars out of the 12's.
Besides.....the original question was about cam only cars hitting 11's. So....add 10 to 15lbs (so it's stock weight) and a cam and I think it's possible.
I think the ones that are calling BS either
1. Don't have the weather/track to hit those times
2. Haven't been around these cars very long
3 Just pissed off because they can't get their heads and cam 400HP cars out of the 12's.
i like this guy. people who want to call bs should really do their research. or better yet, lets get all these people who think that these cars don't do 11's SI altogether and lets go street racin' eeeeeeeaaaassy money.
12-19-2006, 01:13 PM
#39
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im hoping to run 11's with stock internals this spring. My car will not be full weight though, looking at 3350-3400 with me in it. 6 speed car with 4.30's in a 9".
12-23-2006, 02:35 AM
#40
10 Second Club
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran 11.90@115 two years ago with a 224 Comp Cam, stock suspension, TCI 3500, and Pace Setter headers. What made the biggest difference was the Texas Speed computer tune.