PRC or AFR heads
The new C6 Z06 is calling out to me so I'm staying with an easy ~ 400rwhp till I decide whether or not to buy a new one...
good luck with your decision yet for the few extra dollars.....go with the best.... the AFR heads..
Its all about velocity of the air flow.
JMO
It was a pleasure talking to Tony at AFR and Jason at TSP today. Both enlightened me not only about heads, but how my car will react to a little TR224 which at one time was a big cam
Both of you answered an array of questions about more than just heads on the car, but additional parts I thought ID need but wont need.
like I said in the first thread, leaving 10 RWHP on the table isnt a factor for me. ID be happy with 410 RWHP, and I think Id make it with AFR and be close with PRC.
I wont be putting juice in the car so that is off the table.
Id like for the car to be able to be driven on a hot florida day w/o pinging on 92 oct
I just have to see if personally Id like to buy heads and a clutch for the same price I can buy a slightly better head
All I can say is that the decision is the hardest part. If I would have a competition car I would have bought the AFR's...no doubt, but my car is a street car and all I wanted was a nice respectable street car...so I bought the PRC's. I would geuss there might be a difference between the heads, but on the street I will never know nor ever require the difference. My main concern was getting a good, solid performing head; something reliable. My Z is not fun when it is broke.
Both are great companies with great folks behind them. Really, we as customers have little to lose with the folks like AFR, PRC and TEA.
Good luck with your choice, you can't make a bad one here. Thanks to AFR, PRC and TEA for making such good products and our choices so difficult.
Last edited by equandt; Jul 5, 2005 at 07:11 AM.
I have'nt followed PRC's so I can't comment on them but from all the research I did a few months back...if I were buying heads I'd go with the AFR's because I like the concept of high velocity that all of us have read indepth with Tony M's previous threads on the subject....
For that concept...for the implementation of that concept in the AFR heads I'd personally throw the extra 780 dollars at them. Its not just flow numbers and peak hp that are key at least from what we've read over the past few month thats important and why IF I were going for heads...I'd buy AFR ...Its the higher velocity of the air flow according to Tony M that seperates his heads from some of the competition.
There are a great number of very very good choices in heads and there are no wrong decisions. Just different choices.
Good luck Phil. Take your time deciding. Hell often times thats part of the fun.
I always enjoy reading your threads.
JB
I have'nt followed PRC's so I can't comment on them but from all the research I did a few months back...if I were buying heads I'd go with the AFR's because I like the concept of high velocity that all of us have read indepth with Tony M's previous threads on the subject....
For that concept...for the implementation of that concept in the AFR heads I'd personally throw the extra 780 dollars at them. Its not just flow numbers and peak hp that are key at least from what we've read over the past few month thats important and why IF I were going for heads...I'd buy AFR ...Its the higher velocity of the air flow according to Tony M that seperates his heads from some of the competition.
There are a great number of very very good choices in heads and there are no wrong decisions. Just different choices.
Good luck Phil. Take your time deciding. Hell often times thats part of the fun.
I always enjoy reading your threads.
JB
The only thing you could do to make them even more even would be, either AFR came down on their price or TSP went up.
If a head cost 1/3 more than another, it better perform better. PRC's are really good for the money, not only in performance but most importantly in quality.
TSP was not about to embark on another PP adventure.
$1400 for quality parts, good flow and hand finish. That is good bang for buck in my book.
With the extra $780, I was able to get a Spohn trq arm, and I'm thinking another cam.
So you guys are not really comparing apples to apples. But take PRC's 2.5 VS another 5.3L and they win hands down.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
There are many quality sponsors on this board that put out a good product....but the simple fact is that flow charts sometimes don't tell the complete picture. Not to mention ANY true comparisons need to take place on the same testing equipment with the same fixtures, bore diameter, etc. for the comparitive information to be actually worth anything. How close the heads would be to one another (on the same equipment) is anybody's guess. For that matter, trying to compare ANY cylinder heads by simply looking at their advertised flow numbers (if youve read enough of the threads on this board) has proven itself to be very questionable.
That being said, the AFR's DO offer a unique approach to airflow that no ported factory casting can....In finished fully ported trim they are smaller than most production heads before a grinder is even laid to them. They are extremely efficient and their port and chamber design lends itself to many positive factors concerning airspeed and power production.....especially when viewed across the entire RPM range from the crack of the throttle to redline.
This isnt "sales" or marketing....it's fact. Any engineer or qualified engine builder would back me on that. Whether your willing to pay for these features (and others) is absolutely your choice, but be very clear on the fact that they DO exist.
I take nothing away from the PRC's...nothing. Personally I have little experience with them (they are fairly new) and I haven't seen much (or any) negative comments posted on the various boards I frequent.....I think that carries some weight. The reason I posted this is to set the record straight that the AFR's DO in fact offer something the factory ported stuff simply cannot....we started with a clean sheet of paper when designing this line of heads, and there are benefits realized from that proving itself in the field every day. If any of you had the opportunity to take a ride with me when my C5 was together you would have been amazed at the power that engine produced, how broad the power curve was, how strong the low end torque felt, and how it literally drove like a stocker. Phil....one ride in my car and your decision might of been a whole lot easier.
Regards from Zion....
Last edited by Tony Mamo @ AFR; Jul 1, 2005 at 04:42 PM.
Last edited by 99blancoSS; Jul 1, 2005 at 01:58 PM.
I will be sure to post results when that happens. Of course if TSP wants to donate a set for this experiment it would happen a lot sooner. lol
Brian, Jason, Trevor, John anyone listening???
Last edited by Y2K SS; Jul 3, 2005 at 06:30 AM.
Well, I'm waiting for mine, so we will both post feedback and the bird will show its feathers.
So I guess basically I just bought overpriced Patriots. I got some pics I'm gonna ppost of them as well. I have a lot more venting to do but like I said earlier, I wanna give my favorite parts store a chance first. I'm gonna call them at 3am my time just so I can.....oh **** I gotta wait until tuesday. Dunno if I can keep my venting off till then.
So I guess basically I just bought overpriced Patriots. I got some pics I'm gonna ppost of them as well. I have a lot more venting to do but like I said earlier, I wanna give my favorite parts store a chance first. I'm gonna call them at 3am my time just so I can.....oh **** I gotta wait until tuesday. Dunno if I can keep my venting off till then.

Stop down at your favorite speed shop that happens to have an AFR head in hand and look it over closely.....then let me know if you don't see "quality" in every aspect of their execution. We could cut corners in numerous ways (a big one I mentioned above)....and ultimately we could sell it for less but don't think the end results would be as good, or as consistant. The castings are more money, we put in premium parts, we run all the CNC machines at extremely fine levels (more accurate reproduction and better "finish" due to less tool deflection), not to mention we have a ton of time in development and R&D, but honestly, the reasons mentioned previously are where the bulk of the extra costs lie.
Someday we might come out with a "street" version and call the current version our competition package, but don't expect the cheaper product to bring home all the bacon....it won't flow quite as much, nor be as consistant, but it would probably be a decent performing head for a little less money.
Personally, when I'm dropping that kind of coin and the "premium part" is only a few dollars more (especially considering the total cost AND time of the H/C swap), I'm going to opt for the better piece because the nature of what we do always keeps us wanting more....why leave some under the table in the first place.
The AFR's represent value at their current price all things considered....value doesn't necessarily mean low price....it means you get a lot for what you paid for. Your always going to have to pay a little more for quality no matter what product you purchase....the quality is there because more time and better parts went into the finished product.
Redneck Z, this post isn't aimed at you personally so dont take it that way....it's just a topic that keeps coming up over and over and the only people I think that truly get it are the ones that actually purchase the product. I don't know of a single customer that wasn't completely satisfied.
Happy Holiday everyone...
Tony M.
Last edited by Tony Mamo @ AFR; Jul 3, 2005 at 09:51 PM.


