How bad for the environment is a car without a catalytic converter?
I am ordering parts to build the exhaust system, and now realize that in 11 months I don't think I will be required to run catalytic converters, or any emissions equipment at all.
So my question is, how bad is it for the environment to run a car without catalytic converters? I have heard cats reduce smog, but on the flip side, throw off chemicals that supposedly rapidly speed up global warming.
Should I run cats or not?
-Dave
The pollutants aren't so much greenhouse gases as they are smog gases. If you live out in the country, and park outside, and never spend time in traffic, it's no biggie. But, daily driving, in cities, in traffic (it's not just you that gets to smell the power), I'd highly recommend keeping the cats and charcoal canister working - those two are the huge pollution reducing devices.
Also, if a cop pulls you over for hot footing it, he can still ticket you and probably can impound your car for removing an emissions device, and it's an easy check for him to see.
In VA, I will be exempt from emissions testing for registration purposes, however the enforcement officer from the Department of Environmental Quality told me that they set up tests with some sort of sniffer on exhaust ramps that gets readings as cars drive by. If you are a "gross poluter" and your car was built after 1968, they will bust you.
I have heard arguments on smog vs. greenhouse gasses with and without converters, and just wanted to see how everyone weighed in.
Thanks for the help!
that's why you should gut the cats and stick a straight pipe threw them, so it will still look like you have them.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
On the up side, no one could tail gate me because they're eyes would start burning if they got within 4 car lengths of me.
On the down side, I smelt like raw fuel after driving anywhere in it.
You win some, you lose some.

Mine came apart after about 500 miles with 105 unleaded race fuel, leaded will do it even faster.
I wouldn't waste your time with any of that emmissions crap to be honest, if you're slugging an ls1 into an older car, as long as you have some mufflers on it that are quiet enough so you don't get a ton of attenion drawn to ya, you won't have any problems.
CT once a car is 25 years old they are exempt from emmissions testing, I don't know a sole with anything that's got any power that is running the cats on it that doesn't have to.
Tune that car in open loop, don't mess with the o2's at all, that whole canister thing, screw that too really. If you do a fuel system that's got a return on it, just vent the tank and call it a day.
The emmissions that are killing the enviornment aren't coming from the less then 1% of cars without legal emmissions equipment, it's coming from the smoke stacks on factories all over china and other places with no regulations.
if your so worried about the enviornment go vegetarian!
seriously new studies have proved that if we all went veg. the methan produced my pigs/cows is like something atrousously more harmful then all the cars/trucks/planes/buses ectt of the entire world combined!
me im no cats and a meatasaurus
The car is only 25 years old and I want to drive it regularly in the summer. I'll pass on the cat-free smell and sound. I think having no cats would be a novelty and wear off after a few weeks of sitting in traffic to and from work on the DC beltway. Just my opinion.
If the performance loss with a decent set of cats is negligible, I'll stick with the cats. I'd rather give up 5hp than the creature comforts of a cat-free vehicle.
BTW, I have to figure out how the whole charcoal canister thing works. I honestly don't know what it's for or how it hooks up - only that my car has one.
I ran catless for a few months, didn't once smell gas
As far as how bad for the environment is a car without a catalytic converter? Imagine tossing a bottle cap into a landfill, it's got about the same impact, none.
With the gas a 747 jet burns in one hour, you can drive your car to drive around the widest part of the Earth about 3.5 times. And that's leaded fuel getting released 30,000+ feet up in the atmosphere. So don't sweat the environment by going catless.
my old grand prix gtp felt so much stronger without a cat. If you're running stock cats, I bet there is a lot of restriction. I expect less restriction from some steel substrate magnaflow cats.
Another thing to consider - maybe I won't mind the smell of exhaust with no cats, but if it bothers my wife, I'm screwed... or not screwed...
you know what I mean.Those 747s must be running some of that leaded kerosene!









