Post up any car math formulas you may have.
#23
7 Second Club
iTrader: (42)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: paducah, ky
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is your same equation only different order for your CI
R=bore/2
P=3.14.....
H=stroke
(PR^2) H8
ie
3.14(2^2) (4(8))=401.92
basically where people get the bore x bore x bore x stroke is the rounding off of Pi.
Pi= as mentioned ( rounded to 2 decimals, Pi is a never ending number by the way)= 3.14.
ok class... tommorrow well discuss pythagorean theorem
R=bore/2
P=3.14.....
H=stroke
(PR^2) H8
ie
3.14(2^2) (4(8))=401.92
basically where people get the bore x bore x bore x stroke is the rounding off of Pi.
Pi= as mentioned ( rounded to 2 decimals, Pi is a never ending number by the way)= 3.14.
ok class... tommorrow well discuss pythagorean theorem
#24
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
Originally Posted by ls1290
Is there any way to calculate rear wheel horsepower or torque based on vehicle weight, vehicle speed, vehicle acceleration, and engine RPM?
Keith
Keith
but I am not sure how to translate this formula into something that I can explain..
http://www.efilive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24
instantaneous net horspower
Weight in LBS * Speed in MPH * acceleration rate MPH difference over time / 8226.63
#25
Dumb Ass Vette Moderator
iTrader: (20)
Originally Posted by soundengineer
yes....
but I am not sure how to translate this formula into something that I can explain..
http://www.efilive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24
instantaneous net horspower
Weight in LBS * Speed in MPH * acceleration rate MPH difference over time / 8226.63
but I am not sure how to translate this formula into something that I can explain..
http://www.efilive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24
instantaneous net horspower
Weight in LBS * Speed in MPH * acceleration rate MPH difference over time / 8226.63
rwhp = mass * velocity * acceleration
where mass is in kg, velocity is in m/s, and acceleration is on m/s^2. I think the 8226.63 is constant to be used with the EFI pis calculation system.
Keith
#26
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
J- Rod,
Just out of curiosity, what do you do for a living? You are an endless wealth of knowledge for me and I really enjoy reading your threads. I happen to be finishing up my last weeks of college (I major in Mechanical Engineering) as we read this, so this is all very interesting to me.
btw... This new forums was a great idea. I used to spend hours searching the internal engine forum for threads like these.
Rob
Just out of curiosity, what do you do for a living? You are an endless wealth of knowledge for me and I really enjoy reading your threads. I happen to be finishing up my last weeks of college (I major in Mechanical Engineering) as we read this, so this is all very interesting to me.
btw... This new forums was a great idea. I used to spend hours searching the internal engine forum for threads like these.
Rob
#27
Originally Posted by Robs98SS
(I major in Mechanical Engineering) as we read this, so this is all very interesting to me.
btw... This new forums was a great idea. I used to spend hours searching the internal engine forum for threads like these.
Rob
#29
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
Thread Starter
I am what is called a Network Engineer by trade. I build, manitain, and troubleshoot the computer network for a rather large financial services company.
Thanks for everyones help in making this successful.
Thanks for everyones help in making this successful.
#30
Hi folks
Sorry to bring back this old topic but I have question about a formula.
Some of the ECUs has cylinder# based knock detection abilities. So when the knock occurs it shows which cylinder is commited to knock evidence.
I am just wondering the formula to determine which cylinder is firing in a time manner. Can I find it by calculating from RPM and dwell signal? Any example formula?
Sorry to bring back this old topic but I have question about a formula.
Some of the ECUs has cylinder# based knock detection abilities. So when the knock occurs it shows which cylinder is commited to knock evidence.
I am just wondering the formula to determine which cylinder is firing in a time manner. Can I find it by calculating from RPM and dwell signal? Any example formula?
#32
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
How about a gallon per hour (gph) formula?
Can't that be done based off displacement and rpm for a given air/fuel ratio and volumetric efficiency (VE) ?
I happened to be messing with in excel last week to figure out gallons per hour used in my boat. The part I had trouble with was converting cfm of air used into pounds of air, I had trouble finding reliable info or equations for calculating that.
Can't that be done based off displacement and rpm for a given air/fuel ratio and volumetric efficiency (VE) ?
I happened to be messing with in excel last week to figure out gallons per hour used in my boat. The part I had trouble with was converting cfm of air used into pounds of air, I had trouble finding reliable info or equations for calculating that.
#38
all you need is this website
http://www.smokemup.com/auto_math/index.php
Just enter your data and it will do all the calculations for you
http://www.smokemup.com/auto_math/index.php
Just enter your data and it will do all the calculations for you
#39
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I changed the EFILive HP calculations to include ME, Gas and the GVW.
Seems that if you are getting the GVW to get HP and logging with YOU in the car and GAS in the car it would be pretty important to add that data. At only 10 Gallons that's another ~63 pounds, and me 185 that isn't counted. Sure ~250 pounds out of 3554 is only 7% but hey if you are going for more precision, why not? But if you have 2 guys (someone logging and someone driving) that could be an additional 300 pound and you are approaching 10%. People pay a lot of money for 10% difference in HP.
I have 2 different ones just for myself, one over 6 polls and one over 12. Mainly because there are times where you are on the highway or on ramp (great flat places in NC) to get a quick 1/4 time and the change over 6 & 12 polls can show you different info.
I used 6.350 for gas, its what I found as the weight. no reason to argue over that, if you like a different amount or run different gas that weight something else, just use that amount.
Enjoy:
*CLC-00-800
hp 0.0 400.0 .0 "(((3554+({GM.FUELREM}*6.350)+185)*{SAE.VSS.mph})* dx({SAE.VSS.mph},6))/8226.63"
*CLC-00-801
hp 0.0 400.0 .0 "(((3554+({GM.FUELREM}*6.350)+185)*{SAE.VSS.mph})* dx({SAE.VSS.mph},12))/8226.63"
CALC.1-HPTRUE6 F601 CLC-00-800 "kW,hp" Performance "TRUE HPx06"
CALC.1-HPTRUE12 F602 CLC-00-801 "kW,hp" Performance "TRUE HPx12"
Seems that if you are getting the GVW to get HP and logging with YOU in the car and GAS in the car it would be pretty important to add that data. At only 10 Gallons that's another ~63 pounds, and me 185 that isn't counted. Sure ~250 pounds out of 3554 is only 7% but hey if you are going for more precision, why not? But if you have 2 guys (someone logging and someone driving) that could be an additional 300 pound and you are approaching 10%. People pay a lot of money for 10% difference in HP.
I have 2 different ones just for myself, one over 6 polls and one over 12. Mainly because there are times where you are on the highway or on ramp (great flat places in NC) to get a quick 1/4 time and the change over 6 & 12 polls can show you different info.
I used 6.350 for gas, its what I found as the weight. no reason to argue over that, if you like a different amount or run different gas that weight something else, just use that amount.
Enjoy:
*CLC-00-800
hp 0.0 400.0 .0 "(((3554+({GM.FUELREM}*6.350)+185)*{SAE.VSS.mph})* dx({SAE.VSS.mph},6))/8226.63"
*CLC-00-801
hp 0.0 400.0 .0 "(((3554+({GM.FUELREM}*6.350)+185)*{SAE.VSS.mph})* dx({SAE.VSS.mph},12))/8226.63"
CALC.1-HPTRUE6 F601 CLC-00-800 "kW,hp" Performance "TRUE HPx06"
CALC.1-HPTRUE12 F602 CLC-00-801 "kW,hp" Performance "TRUE HPx12"
#40
Banned
iTrader: (2)
After you all use that stuff to build an engine, run it down the track, then use this table to see what you do 0-60mph. I was surprised........
2.3 second 60' time = 35.5 mph @60' = 7.0 second 0-60mph time
2.2 second 60' time = 37.1 mph @60' = 6.5 second 0-60mph time
2.1 second 60' time = 38.9 mph @60' = 5.9 second 0-60mph time
2.0 second 60' time = 40.9 mph @60' = 5.2 second 0-60mph time
1.9 second 60' time = 43.0 mph @60' = 4.6 second 0-60mph time
1.8 second 60' time = 45.5 mph @60' = 4.0 second 0-60mph time
1.7 second 60' time = 48.1 mph @60' = 3.4 second 0-60mph time
1.6 second 60' time = 51.1 mph @60' = 2.9 second 0-60mph time
1.5 second 60' time = 54.5 mph @60' = 2.2 second 0-60mph time
1.4 second 60' time = 58.4 mph @60' = 1.5 second 0-60mph time
1.36 second 60' time = 60.0 mph @60' = 1.36 second 0-60mph time
1.3 second 60' time = 62.9 mph @60' = 1.2 second 0-60mph time
1.2 second 60' time = 68.1 mph @60' = 1.1 second 0-60mph time
1.1 second 60' time = 74.3 mph @60' = 0.9 second 0-60mph time
1.0 second 60' time = 81.8 mph @60' = 0.7 second 0-60mph time
.
2.3 second 60' time = 35.5 mph @60' = 7.0 second 0-60mph time
2.2 second 60' time = 37.1 mph @60' = 6.5 second 0-60mph time
2.1 second 60' time = 38.9 mph @60' = 5.9 second 0-60mph time
2.0 second 60' time = 40.9 mph @60' = 5.2 second 0-60mph time
1.9 second 60' time = 43.0 mph @60' = 4.6 second 0-60mph time
1.8 second 60' time = 45.5 mph @60' = 4.0 second 0-60mph time
1.7 second 60' time = 48.1 mph @60' = 3.4 second 0-60mph time
1.6 second 60' time = 51.1 mph @60' = 2.9 second 0-60mph time
1.5 second 60' time = 54.5 mph @60' = 2.2 second 0-60mph time
1.4 second 60' time = 58.4 mph @60' = 1.5 second 0-60mph time
1.36 second 60' time = 60.0 mph @60' = 1.36 second 0-60mph time
1.3 second 60' time = 62.9 mph @60' = 1.2 second 0-60mph time
1.2 second 60' time = 68.1 mph @60' = 1.1 second 0-60mph time
1.1 second 60' time = 74.3 mph @60' = 0.9 second 0-60mph time
1.0 second 60' time = 81.8 mph @60' = 0.7 second 0-60mph time
.