Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

Camshaft discussion: CFM requirements by RPM.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2004, 08:07 AM
  #301  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Black,
Your welcome. J-rod, that is the first time I have ever seen Ed give any "specs" out. You better mark this day.

Chris
Old 05-07-2004, 08:29 AM
  #302  
TECH Resident
 
Ed Curtis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Working in the shop 24/7
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cstraub
Black,
Your welcome. J-rod, that is the first time I have ever seen Ed give any "specs" out. You better mark this day.

Chris

Well...

There's a few times where I get weak...

BTW... nothing from Watson Racing yet...

Why is it your customers are slow paying???

Ed
Old 05-07-2004, 08:40 AM
  #303  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cstraub
Black,
Your welcome. J-rod, that is the first time I have ever seen Ed give any "specs" out. You better mark this day.

Chris
I am, I am.

Ed, and Chris both. Thank you both for your input. Hopefully discussions like this will help folks think about more than just LSA.

I do think its interesting though...

Chris:
233 Int.
229 Exh.
Max HP at 6100 will pull till 6500
Max Torque at 4300

Ed:
.585" Int - .575" Exh
232* Int - 234* Exh @ .050"
111* LSA - 110* ICL

Of course depending on lobes design and rocker ratio, these could be identical cams.
Old 05-07-2004, 09:01 AM
  #304  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

Beast,

for the Absolute LS6 2.75 head listed above that flows 294 cfm at .600, my ghetto math says the following...

383/2*6800 divided by 1728 = 753 cfm needed

753/8 is 94.2 per cylinder

to get 94.2 in per cylinder with 294 of flow w/intake

94.2/294 = .320 out of 720 degrees of rotation

720*.320 = 230.4 degress of intake duration

~230.4 of intake duration which is actually smaller than most 383 use. Of course very few heads can flow like Jay's or TEA's.
Old 05-07-2004, 09:03 AM
  #305  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

Wow Ed actually gave us a number of a cam....I'll mark this in my calander too Chris & J-Rod.
Old 05-07-2004, 10:21 AM
  #306  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn those numbers at .050" are a bitch....just can't tell what is going on.

Thanks for participating Ed and Chris. It is greatly appreciated.

Maybe our next conversation should be a discussion on how poor of a performance metric horsepower is....
Old 05-07-2004, 12:16 PM
  #307  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Glad I could input. Duration needs to be address from the seat duration all the way up the lobe. By selecting lobes that compliement the heads, a well balanced combinaton can be had by the end user.

Chris
Old 05-07-2004, 01:05 PM
  #308  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

DenzSS - Where is that math you promised us?
Old 05-07-2004, 01:18 PM
  #309  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Doh. I'll get the equation written out this weekend.
Old 05-07-2004, 01:32 PM
  #310  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This will get you the velocity and acceleration curves, the cfm is fairly easy after that.
You can see how it is much easier to do in an application...

Old 05-07-2004, 03:59 PM
  #311  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
SScam68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Albuquerque NM - The Land of 8000ft DA
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

thats a nasty derivative
Old 05-07-2004, 04:07 PM
  #312  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

Looks simple enough to crunch.

What does each of the variables stand for? I'm guess r is radius but have no idea bout b,w, t etc.

Thanks
Old 05-07-2004, 05:02 PM
  #313  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Looks simple enough to crunch.

What does each of the variables stand for? I'm guess r is radius but have no idea bout b,w, t etc.

Thanks
Yes, and sorry if I missed it inside the calculations but all are a function of t, but what do the 3 calulate in relation to t?
Old 05-07-2004, 05:12 PM
  #314  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Beast,

for the Absolute LS6 2.75 head listed above that flows 294 cfm at .600, my ghetto math says the following...

383/2*6800 divided by 1728 = 753 cfm needed

753/8 is 94.2 per cylinder

to get 94.2 in per cylinder with 294 of flow w/intake

94.2/294 = .320 out of 720 degrees of rotation

720*.320 = 230.4 degress of intake duration

~230.4 of intake duration which is actually smaller than most 383 use. Of course very few heads can flow like Jay's or TEA's.
But as you can see, you had to add the larger heads to get the formula to work. If a person where stuck with poorer flowing heads, such as the heads in the first equation (275 w/intake) the cam would have to be in the 250* range according to the math. Then again, what about more CI eating up camshaft? Now we have a 383 with less camshaft than the 346. Can you guys hit on adding CI to the mix? I'd like to see how that factors into the equation.
Old 05-07-2004, 08:30 PM
  #315  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Beast,

for the Absolute LS6 2.75 head listed above that flows 294 cfm at .600, my ghetto math says the following...

383/2*6800 divided by 1728 = 753 cfm needed

753/8 is 94.2 per cylinder

to get 94.2 in per cylinder with 294 of flow w/intake

94.2/294 = .320 out of 720 degrees of rotation

720*.320 = 230.4 degress of intake duration

~230.4 of intake duration which is actually smaller than most 383 use. Of course very few heads can flow like Jay's or TEA's.
Using your ghetto math I cam up with about a 218 intake duration for my car LOL!!
Old 05-08-2004, 10:56 AM
  #316  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
jmorgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have a 2000 v6 camaro A4


Heads with intake might flow say 170ish, the max ive seen or heard ported heads for my car flow 235-240ish with no intake


from the getto math I came up with

(231ci/2)*6200rpm/1728= 414cfm
414/6 cylinders= 69cfm per cylinder
69/170 cfm(head flow)= .405
.405*720= 292 duration

that would be a huge cam
unless my head flow numbers were off by over 50cfm more which I know cant be
anyone know whats wrong (besides missing 2 cylinders)?

ohh yea lift is limited to about .520 with stock heads
Old 05-08-2004, 02:28 PM
  #317  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dyess AFB, TX
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by J-Rod
I am, I am.

Ed, and Chris both. Thank you both for your input. Hopefully discussions like this will help folks think about more than just LSA.

I do think its interesting though...

Chris:
233 Int.
229 Exh.
Max HP at 6100 will pull till 6500
Max Torque at 4300

Ed:
.585" Int - .575" Exh
232* Int - 234* Exh @ .050"
111* LSA - 110* ICL

Of course depending on lobes design and rocker ratio, these could be identical cams.
The cam I came up with for this situation was:

(@.050)

Intake Duration - ID 234/.588
Exhaust Duration - ED 230/.582
Lobe Center Angle - LCA 111
Intake Centerline - ICL 109

This was before the experts posted theirs. "I'm learnding"
Old 05-08-2004, 09:55 PM
  #318  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
critter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Looks simple enough to crunch.

What does each of the variables stand for? I'm guess r is radius but have no idea bout b,w, t etc.

Thanks
Black Bird and Carvinta - you can find answers here. Rollins gives the derivation and tells what the variables are. Good stuff.
Old 05-09-2004, 06:41 PM
  #319  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by critter
Black Bird and Carvinta - you can find answers here. Rollins gives the derivation and tells what the variables are. Good stuff.
That's impressive. That'll take another couple mods to digest.
Old 05-10-2004, 05:50 AM
  #320  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

this thread is , great info.


Quick Reply: Camshaft discussion: CFM requirements by RPM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM.