Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

Cast Iron Versus Aluminum Torque Plate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2005, 01:41 PM
  #1  
LS1 Tech Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve Bryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Cast Iron Versus Aluminum Torque Plate

I have a set of cast iron LQ4 heads which I've hand ported (see https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....51&postcount=2) and have been using on my truck for about 6 months. Now, I've bought an LQ4 block and I'm planning to build a 408 relatively low cost stroker to run on 87 Octane as my present engine does. This engine is all about NA torque through about 4,500 as the truck weighs 6,900 pounds and I tow an 8,600 pound trailer. I will be decking the block shooting for the pistons to be flush with the deck, align honing the crank and boring and honing the cylinders to 4.030".

Here's my question: Is a cast iron torque plate really better for cast iron heads (as some say) or does it really make any difference?

Thanks in advance for your input.

Steve
Old 10-25-2005, 02:09 PM
  #2  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Rokko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MLT
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would use the same material for torque plates.
Old 10-25-2005, 04:23 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
Old SStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Steve Bryant
Here's my question: Is a cast iron torque plate really better for cast iron heads (as some say) or does it really make any difference?

Thanks in advance for your input.

Steve
Any torque plate has bore-sized holes through it which makes it a lot less rigid than any cylinder head.

That being said, isn't a torque plate used to distort the bores around the head bolts/studs like the attached head does? Before torque plates became popular there was some use of a stack of washers or a spacer under torqued head bolts to distort the block for honing. It might be interesting to check the difference in distortion by using the bolt 'n spacer method vs. the full torque plate method. The loads on the plate are virtually 100% compressive, so it probably really doesn't matter which you use. Don't most shops have steel plates? I'd use a steel or iron plate for everything.

Steve, are you recamming for the rpm range you use for towing? You might gain some there if you are willing to work the valvetrain a bit harder. Of course the most dynamic compression you can live with is your friend even with 87.

My $.02
Old 10-25-2005, 04:48 PM
  #4  
LS1 Tech Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve Bryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My current cam is the third cam that I've had in the truck.
1. stock
2. Comp 212/218 w. 114 LSA
3. Comp 200/206 w 109 LSA

If I bore and stroke the engine as planned, I'll probably try my 212/218 first since I'll get more torque down low with the larger displacement. The 200/206 cam is excellent in a heavy vehicle like mine with the 6.0 L for general use. It looses about 25 HP and gains about 25 pound feet of torque. Off idle torque levels are excellent.

I agree that the only function of a torque plate is to allow the application of tension to the bottom of the cylinders and the distortion caused by that tension during boring and honing to get a more constant radius bore. The torque plate allows the load of the bolts/studs to be distributed across the plane of the deck in a normal fashion. Personally, I don't believe that there could be any difference between steel, iron or aluminum. You just want a rigid, flat plane.

Steve

Steve
Old 10-25-2005, 07:04 PM
  #5  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I have seen different head gaskets cause different load distortion on the top of the cylinder. We always use the gasket/fasteners that will be used in the running engine.
I have some iron plates and some aluminum. They both seem to do the same job, although the iron should be more rigid.

Kurt
Old 10-26-2005, 08:59 AM
  #6  
LS1 Tech Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve Bryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks Kurt,
Your last remark, "They both seem to do the same job . . ." is very much in line with my thinking. I can also see how the head gasket will literally have a bearing on the cylinder shape.

I think that I am going to conclude that any torque plate of sufficient rigidity that is accurately constructed will be sufficient to properly apply the clamping loads applied to the cylinder head bolts/studs and result in a superior boring and honing when it is installed correctly (torque with fastener lubrication in the proper sequence with the planned head gasket).

Thanks to all who commented,

Steve
Old 10-26-2005, 05:33 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
 
99 2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Steve,
Curious to know what your current engine mods dyno at?
Thanks
Old 10-26-2005, 05:38 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
vipex70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tampa Bay Metro Area
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorry to be a complete an utter, n00b, but just what is a torque-plate? Just though I'd ask...
Old 10-26-2005, 10:57 PM
  #9  
Teching In
 
caddycarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a torque plate is bolted to the block inplace of the head while the block is being honed ..... this is to mimic the destortion caused by the bolts so it is honed to a shape that will be round when the head is torqued to the block...

Old 10-27-2005, 12:37 PM
  #10  
LS1 Tech Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve Bryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

99 2500
With the 212/218 cam running 87 Octane, I ran about 280 HP/320 Pounds-Feet at the rear Wheels. With the 200/206 cam and 87 Octane, I run about 245 HP/345 Pounds-Feet at the rear wheels. I have a lot of drive train losses with the 4L80E, a transfer case and 265/75R16 Load Range E tires. This is on an inertial dyno (dynojet).

Steve
Old 12-13-2005, 01:00 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
'02 SLP#686's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is more important to have the tourque plate match the mass of the cylinder heads to be used rather than material... that being said, like materials are probably better.
Old 01-05-2006, 02:19 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
busta9876's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: West Plains, Missouri
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

It is my thinking that the LSX Gen III engines head bolts pull from the bottem of the bores, not at the deck surface,

is bore distortion as large on the LSx engines when not using torque plates?

just my thoughts.



Quick Reply: Cast Iron Versus Aluminum Torque Plate



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.