Designing optimum runners and plenum?
Is there a cheap way to do this other than purchasing Dynomation or trial and error on the dyno? I have a limited ability to do CFD (computational fluid dynamics) with Solidworks, but I doubt it's going to be powerful enough to tell me something useful.
I'm not looking for every last drop of HP/TQ here, I just don't want to design a turd for an intake manifold.
Is there a cheap way to do this other than purchasing Dynomation or trial and error on the dyno? I have a limited ability to do CFD (computational fluid dynamics) with Solidworks, but I doubt it's going to be powerful enough to tell me something useful.
I'm not looking for every last drop of HP/TQ here, I just don't want to design a turd for an intake manifold.
Yeah there is a cheap way to do it... LEARN THE MATH BEHIND IT.
"Scientific Design of Exhaust & Intake Systems" by Smith & Morrison
Would be the place to start.
Bret
The plenum, if I remember correctly, you want about 1.5 times the engine displacement for a 346 making about 520 flywheel(1.5 hp per ci).
Or about 520 ci of plenum volume.
then bone up on solving differential equations.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/Helmholtz.html
Trending Topics
Probably at around 6000RPM.
bret
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If you can narrow it down to maybe a 1,500 RPM spread, recognizing that gains in one area means losses in another, then you can begin working with the various formulas to get in the ballpark. For example, the formulae given by Curtis Leaverton, creator of Dynomation, are: Second pulse runner length = 108,000/RPM; 3rd = 97,000/RPM; 4th = 74,000/RPM; 5th = 54,000/RPM. As you can see, a given length can tune at several RPMs, but will of course "anti-tune" in between. The lower number pulses give a stronger tune. Plenum size gets a lot of different answers; you could do worse than approximating the sizes used by Hogan, Wilson, etc. for similar applications. Also, taper angle affects both power and effective tuned length (a 4° taper, 13" long runner tunes about like a 10" zero taper.) Bell has similar formulae, as do others; in fact one of the problems is deciding which to use. As the saying goes: "The man with a watch knows the time. The man with two is never quite sure."
then bone up on solving differential equations.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/Helmholtz.html






