Designing optimum runners and plenum?
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Designing optimum runners and plenum?
I'm in the middle of designing and building a sheetmetal intake manifold, and I have the basics done already (flanges drawn up, port sizes/locations, etc). What I'm looking to do now it determine the optimum runner length, and plenum volume for my application.
Is there a cheap way to do this other than purchasing Dynomation or trial and error on the dyno? I have a limited ability to do CFD (computational fluid dynamics) with Solidworks, but I doubt it's going to be powerful enough to tell me something useful.
I'm not looking for every last drop of HP/TQ here, I just don't want to design a turd for an intake manifold.
Is there a cheap way to do this other than purchasing Dynomation or trial and error on the dyno? I have a limited ability to do CFD (computational fluid dynamics) with Solidworks, but I doubt it's going to be powerful enough to tell me something useful.
I'm not looking for every last drop of HP/TQ here, I just don't want to design a turd for an intake manifold.
#2
Originally Posted by Zeus
I'm in the middle of designing and building a sheetmetal intake manifold, and I have the basics done already (flanges drawn up, port sizes/locations, etc). What I'm looking to do now it determine the optimum runner length, and plenum volume for my application.
Is there a cheap way to do this other than purchasing Dynomation or trial and error on the dyno? I have a limited ability to do CFD (computational fluid dynamics) with Solidworks, but I doubt it's going to be powerful enough to tell me something useful.
I'm not looking for every last drop of HP/TQ here, I just don't want to design a turd for an intake manifold.
Is there a cheap way to do this other than purchasing Dynomation or trial and error on the dyno? I have a limited ability to do CFD (computational fluid dynamics) with Solidworks, but I doubt it's going to be powerful enough to tell me something useful.
I'm not looking for every last drop of HP/TQ here, I just don't want to design a turd for an intake manifold.
#5
TECH Addict
Search for "ram tuning" on google. You'll find a lot of info about runner crosssectional area and length.
The plenum, if I remember correctly, you want about 1.5 times the engine displacement for a 346 making about 520 flywheel(1.5 hp per ci).
Or about 520 ci of plenum volume.
The plenum, if I remember correctly, you want about 1.5 times the engine displacement for a 346 making about 520 flywheel(1.5 hp per ci).
Or about 520 ci of plenum volume.
#6
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rjgto
Where do you want your power to peak at?
Probably at around 6000RPM.
#7
Google for "Helmholtz resonator" or "Helmholtz resonance"
then bone up on solving differential equations.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/Helmholtz.html
then bone up on solving differential equations.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/Helmholtz.html
Trending Topics
#9
The first thing I would recommend is some soul-searching re the desired RPM range. For example if you wanted "maximum torque from 1,500 to 6,000 RPM", your choices are: 1. Stock. 2. Variable geometry. 3. A belt-drive manifold (aka supercharger)
If you can narrow it down to maybe a 1,500 RPM spread, recognizing that gains in one area means losses in another, then you can begin working with the various formulas to get in the ballpark. For example, the formulae given by Curtis Leaverton, creator of Dynomation, are: Second pulse runner length = 108,000/RPM; 3rd = 97,000/RPM; 4th = 74,000/RPM; 5th = 54,000/RPM. As you can see, a given length can tune at several RPMs, but will of course "anti-tune" in between. The lower number pulses give a stronger tune. Plenum size gets a lot of different answers; you could do worse than approximating the sizes used by Hogan, Wilson, etc. for similar applications. Also, taper angle affects both power and effective tuned length (a 4° taper, 13" long runner tunes about like a 10" zero taper.) Bell has similar formulae, as do others; in fact one of the problems is deciding which to use. As the saying goes: "The man with a watch knows the time. The man with two is never quite sure."
If you can narrow it down to maybe a 1,500 RPM spread, recognizing that gains in one area means losses in another, then you can begin working with the various formulas to get in the ballpark. For example, the formulae given by Curtis Leaverton, creator of Dynomation, are: Second pulse runner length = 108,000/RPM; 3rd = 97,000/RPM; 4th = 74,000/RPM; 5th = 54,000/RPM. As you can see, a given length can tune at several RPMs, but will of course "anti-tune" in between. The lower number pulses give a stronger tune. Plenum size gets a lot of different answers; you could do worse than approximating the sizes used by Hogan, Wilson, etc. for similar applications. Also, taper angle affects both power and effective tuned length (a 4° taper, 13" long runner tunes about like a 10" zero taper.) Bell has similar formulae, as do others; in fact one of the problems is deciding which to use. As the saying goes: "The man with a watch knows the time. The man with two is never quite sure."
#10
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to make things clear to everyone, this isn't for performance reasons. I'm in a CAD class right now (Mechanical Engineering student) and this is my end of year project. The fact that I also want to put it on the car is just a "because I have it and can" type deal.
#11
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ConnClark
Google for "Helmholtz resonator" or "Helmholtz resonance"
then bone up on solving differential equations.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/Helmholtz.html
then bone up on solving differential equations.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/Helmholtz.html
#12
Originally Posted by Zeus
I hav the rev-limiter set at 6700 right now and shift at 6500.
Probably at around 6000RPM.
Probably at around 6000RPM.
#15
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MadBill
...Also, taper angle affects both power and effective tuned length (a 4° taper, 13" long runner tunes about like a 10" zero taper.) ...
#16
Originally Posted by Zeus
By inverse logic, does this mean that a reverse taped runner would behave as though it's longer (i.e. a 10" 4° inverse taper acts like a 13")?