Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

What's the ideal DCR for LSx Engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2006 | 05:07 AM
  #1  
Billiumss's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 15
From: Erie, PA
Question What's the ideal DCR for LSx Engines

What is the ideal DCR for our cars? Is there one?

I know many things affect it (cam ,heads, bore, stroke, head gasket, pistons)

I know there is always a trade off somewhere when you want power, usually at the expense of idle quality.

Would you want a certain DCR for a 346 CI vs. a 408 CI?

Thanks in advance,

Bill
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006 | 04:34 PM
  #2  
Patrick G's Avatar
LS1 Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,246
Likes: 34
From: Victoria, TX
Default

8.5:1 seems to be the limit for 91 Octane and 8.8:1 seems to be the limit for 93. If you're running higher octane than this, you can bring up DCR.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #3  
Beast96Z's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 3
From: Shreveport, LA
Default

Ideal would be the highest you can get away with without pinging.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 05:47 AM
  #4  
Billiumss's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 15
From: Erie, PA
Exclamation

So basically play around with the calculators till I get close to 8.5 - 8.8.

The values you gave me, are those like an average compression for the whole stroke, just want to understand why it's so important and the full meaning of DCR.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 06:03 AM
  #5  
Billiumss's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 15
From: Erie, PA
Default

Also, what would be considered range of a bad DCR?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 06:21 AM
  #6  
chrismcdaniel's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Default

and im also interested in the original question of 346 vs 408 DCR's, i was told you have a little bit higher DCR with the larger motor... is that BS?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 06:26 AM
  #7  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 2
From: NY
Default

At one point you guys will start to run into detonation with increased VE levels. LT1 motors can take a ton of static and dynamic compression due to the good cooling of the GM castings and the revearse cooling. Even with that older chamber design, but if you get the Vol Eff% up high enough you can even have issues with 8.3:1 DCR on pump gas, it's not going to knock at low loads and low RPM but once the motor starts making over 110% VE (210+BMEP) it will start rattling. You cna help this out by reducing engine temps with lower thermostats, colder intake air etc... So a lot of how much your motor can take depends on other factors as well. Different chamber designs can have a impact on the amount of compression you can run and in LS1 land we have a pretty big assortment of chambers, just look at what GM gives us in a LS1, LS6, L92 castings. Not to mention the ET, AFR, TFS and Darts.

Bret
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 10:03 AM
  #8  
gollum's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Even with that older chamber design, but if you get the Vol Eff% up high enough you can even have issues with 8.3:1 DCR on pump gas, it's not going to knock at low loads and low RPM but once the motor starts making over 110% VE (210+BMEP) it will start rattling.

Bret
Bret, Have you ever seen an LS1, LS6 make any thing close to 110% VE? How efficient are these motors with their plastic intakes and say AFR 205 heads?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #9  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 2
From: NY
Default

Yep, if you do them right 110VE is there. The intakes make them even more efficient in the midrange.

bret
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 11:53 AM
  #10  
gollum's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 9
Default

"Without question, the most common mistake in racing is to buy parts impulsively without having a clear vision of where you want to end up. The result is often a pile of mismatched pieces that will never work together properly." - David Reher


I know its a lot to ask but when buying parts for a strong running LS1 LS2 LS6 346ci street car what would be a wise choice to make? Heads, Intake, and Cam timing

Could you also suggest a good 402 street build also?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 01:10 PM
  #11  
DavidNJ's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
At one point you guys will start to run into detonation with increased VE levels. LT1 motors can take a ton of static and dynamic compression due to the good cooling of the GM castings and the revearse cooling. Even with that older chamber design, but if you get the Vol Eff% up high enough you can even have issues with 8.3:1 DCR on pump gas, it's not going to knock at low loads and low RPM but once the motor starts making over 110% VE (210+BMEP) it will start rattling. You cna help this out by reducing engine temps with lower thermostats, colder intake air etc... So a lot of how much your motor can take depends on other factors as well. Different chamber designs can have a impact on the amount of compression you can run and in LS1 land we have a pretty big assortment of chambers, just look at what GM gives us in a LS1, LS6, L92 castings. Not to mention the ET, AFR, TFS and Darts.

Bret
Would coating also help? Would one chamber--AFR, TF, ET--handle higher compression better than the others?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 04:58 PM
  #12  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 2
From: NY
Default

David,

The only way to know would be to test it.

Gollum,

PM me about that. A lot of it depends on what you want to do.

Bret
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #13  
DavidNJ's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
8.5:1 seems to be the limit for 91 Octane and 8.8:1 seems to be the limit for 93. If you're running higher octane than this, you can bring up DCR.
Are you using the seat times or the .050 times? If the seat times, your calcs would show a huge advantage for a solid lifter camshaft with its 15-20° smaller major intensity.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 06:50 PM
  #14  
Patrick G's Avatar
LS1 Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,246
Likes: 34
From: Victoria, TX
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
Are you using the seat times or the .050 times? If the seat times, your calcs would show a huge advantage for a solid lifter camshaft with its 15-20° smaller major intensity.
Seat times, definitely. Once you crack the valve open, you're bleeding off compression. Once you close it, the compression starts. Seat times are key and a huge reason why solid rollers perform so well. Generous durations at .050 and .200" vs seat duration.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 07:21 PM
  #15  
DavidNJ's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 1
Default

So why not try your current combo with solid XE Street Rollers instead of LSKs. With the same seat timing you could be a 236/242. Or you could do 228/232 with a much higher DCR.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 09:38 PM
  #16  
Patrick G's Avatar
LS1 Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,246
Likes: 34
From: Victoria, TX
Default

Cost is the current detriment to going solid roller. Probably at least $2,000. With all the advantages though, I'm sure I'll be there again someday. It's like having your cake and eating it too, huh?
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #17  
DavidNJ's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 1
Default

There is an issue with hammering the needle bearings at idle...but yes...the whole hydraulic lifters in performance cars is an emissions thing IMHO.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 11:56 PM
  #18  
cws T/A's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
There is an issue with hammering the needle bearings at idle...but yes...the whole hydraulic lifters in performance cars is an emissions thing IMHO.


Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 12:32 AM
  #19  
gun5l1ng3r's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
There is an issue with hammering the needle bearings at idle...but yes...the whole hydraulic lifters in performance cars is an emissions thing IMHO.
And a valve adjustment thing (every 10K mi?)...
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 02:40 AM
  #20  
ringram's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 1
From: Sunny London, UK
Default



There is your answer (or at least a good view on it). Read the full article as well http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...power_squeeze/

As mentioned there are lots of things to consider with max DCR including quench, chamber design, intake temps, efficient exhaust. Engine temps have a large effect as noted in the diagram above.

Last edited by ringram; Jul 2, 2006 at 02:57 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.