Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

Offset bores?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2008, 03:05 AM
  #21  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Drew04GTO
Those engines actually had multi piece crankshafts with splined pieces that would press together. If you notice the rods are single piece and have ball/needle bearings where they ride on the crank. I don't think cylinder phasing is right on that pic with all the valves and stuff, I can't imagine anyone ever getting to ballance correctly like that. Would have atleast thought the other side of the crank would be 180 degrees off.

I can't imagine ballancing that was any worse than Honda's V-5 (yes, a V-5) MotoGP bike that used varrying bores and to ballance the rotating assembly. Its funny how quickly this thread has turned into a "look at all this crazy **** Hondas doing

hmmmmm the Honda V5! what an amazing engine. think they should bring it out on a road bike! lol

press together bottom end!?!?! sounds cool. guess you could then use proper bearings on the big ends. wonder if it would be stronger than a conventional crankshaft??

do these bike engines run any type of balancer shafts or anything??

Chris,
Old 03-19-2008, 11:04 AM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Drew04GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuntington101
hmmmmm the Honda V5! what an amazing engine. think they should bring it out on a road bike! lol

press together bottom end!?!?! sounds cool. guess you could then use proper bearings on the big ends. wonder if it would be stronger than a conventional crankshaft??

do these bike engines run any type of balancer shafts or anything??

Chris,
I've only messed around with a few bike engines in my time, none of them had ballance shafts in them, nor do I think I've ever heard about any having one, I could be horribly wrong though. Most bike engines have short lives compared to cars and already vibrate and whatnot, its not really an issue in their application IMO.

Press together bottom end can be useful in the fact that you can use real "bearings" instead of the hydrodynamic 2 pieces ones in conventional motors. They fail though in the fact that each piece is splined where it meets the other pieces and that is your weak link. They're typically in 1-3 cylinder engines of older design, that Honda is the first 4/8? cylinder I've seen that is press together also. They do allow for really cool things to happen in the case of the Kawasaki H1/H2. They were 500/750cc 2 stroke 3 cylinders with cylinders and bottom end cases as one piece, but seperate from another cylinder. Crank was press together also, so you could put together as many cylinders as you wanted. 100% modular engines are neat, sucks you have to make them weak to do it.
Old 04-21-2023, 02:24 PM
  #23  
Staging Lane
 
Gnx1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Tx
Posts: 77
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HSV-GTS-300
I see the advantage for the power stroke......but wouldn't rod angularity, scuffing,lateral force, slap and friction also be increased (due to the offset) on both of the upstrokes ? No mention of that in the article.
no it’s better ,I know this is very old and I didn’t read every single entry,but the offset prevents everything you’ve mentioned that's the point.the offset keeps the rod and piston going up and down equally on all sides of the cylinder,producing more power due to less friction ..all none offset cylinders are loosing power due to increased friction it also weakens the rods under heavier loads as it is also always trying to spin the rod bearings and all the forces are directly aimed at the small end of the rod which also means the motor can handle less power than off set motors everything else being equal..plus a none offset engine wastes power through friction so the more power a engine makes the more friction and more power wasted as the piston is driven into the cylinder wall..
Old 04-21-2023, 04:24 PM
  #24  
TECH Apprentice
 
Woodylyf767's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Ohio
Posts: 356
Received 95 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drew04GTO
I was reading some stuff the other day about the Honda Insight engine using offset bores to move the connecting rod inline with the piston during peak cylinder pressure. I know it would require a custom one off block and I'm not really interested in trying this out myself just curious to see if its ever been done on anything but this motor. Valvetrain would probably also be beyond wacky, when is GM supposed to come out with that OHC LS motor?


Stolen from InsightCentral.net
"The engine block has a unique, offset cylinder design in which the bore center is offset 14mm from the crank center. Maximum combustion pressure occurs at a point where the connecting rod is straight up and down in the cylinder. In this position there is zero lateral force so friction and piston slap are reduced.

As a result of the offset construction, the combustion pressure is used more efficiently since the rod is near it maximum leverage point with the crankshaft."



Every 4 cylinder Honda I've seen coming out now has an offset bore

Edit: if someone reminds me in a week I can dig through my laptop and find some stuff wrote up about cylinder offset



Quick Reply: Offset bores?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.