Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno questions with a stall

Old Jan 23, 2004 | 11:07 PM
  #1  
2000Blackout's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default Dyno questions with a stall

I just put in a Yank SS3800,new built tranny,my questiion is how much hp im I going to lose from the unlocked stall?I dynoed about 30 less hp then before? Is this normal?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 12:01 AM
  #2  
Hugger SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Yanks normally lose about 8-10 rwhp lbetween ocked and unlocked
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 07:49 AM
  #3  
JNorris's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL
Default

Originally Posted by 2000Blackout
I just put in a Yank SS3800,new built tranny,my questiion is how much hp im I going to lose from the unlocked stall?I dynoed about 30 less hp then before? Is this normal?

That seems about right to me.

Take a look at the locked vs unlocked dynos of a YPT4400 in the link below. There is almost a 40 hp difference at 6000rpm.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/132000-finally-dyno-d-my-10-second-cam-only-setup.html

The guy runs high 10s with a cam only


John
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 08:48 AM
  #4  
2000Blackout's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Okay so me seeing the 30hp loss is common with a high stall?I was very dissapointed in my numbers with my mods.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:10 AM
  #5  
JNorris's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL
Default

Originally Posted by 2000Blackout
Okay so me seeing the 30hp loss is common with a high stall?I was very dissapointed in my numbers with my mods.
What were your peak hp numbers @ RPM locked vs unlocked with the SS3800?

John
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:19 AM
  #6  
JNorris's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL
Default

Originally Posted by Hugger SS
Yanks normally lose about 8-10 rwhp lbetween ocked and unlocked
Assuming you are using a quality converter efficiency will depend mainly on the stall speed of the converter and gear ratio, and the RPM it is measured at.

If you dyno 400hp locked and 390 unlocked then the converter would be 97.5% efficient. It is unlikely you will see that kind of efficiency on a 4000+ stall at 6000 rpm.

John
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:24 AM
  #7  
Hugger SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Thats what I saw on my PT4200 and I know of a few others...Now when I had my vigilante converter...It was about 30 rw difference
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 09:30 AM
  #8  
2000Blackout's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

I dont have a lock up switch so i couldnt compare my numbers,it gained a ton down low,but flatens out at 5400??
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #9  
DeepBlueZ's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

i lost 23 hp with my old TCS 3400. 314 unlocked/337 locked.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 02:44 PM
  #10  
JNorris's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL
Default

Originally Posted by Hugger SS
Thats what I saw on my PT4200 and I know of a few others...Now when I had my vigilante converter...It was about 30 rw difference

You got a good one!

I can tell you that with my PT4400 I only saw 90% efficiency (measured on the street) at 6200 rpm running 3.23 gears. Below 6000 efficiency was 80%-85%.


John

Last edited by JNorris; Jan 24, 2004 at 02:55 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 02:48 PM
  #11  
JNorris's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL
Default

Originally Posted by 2000Blackout
I dont have a lock up switch so i couldnt compare my numbers,it gained a ton down low,but flatens out at 5400??

So your comparison is between the stock TC and the SS3800 both being unlocked?

Can you post your dyno?

John
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 02:49 PM
  #12  
JNorris's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL
Default

Originally Posted by DeepBlueZ
i lost 23 hp with my old TCS 3400. 314 unlocked/337 locked.

That is 93% efficient. What RPM was that measured at?

How about with the Vig 3200?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 04:49 PM
  #13  
StreetStalkerZ's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
From: Boggy Creek
Default

Originally Posted by JNorris
That is 93% efficient. What RPM was that measured at?

How about with the Vig 3200?
My old dyno with the Vig. 3200/3.73s was 340rwhp unlocked and 356rwhp locked. Very efficient converter.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #14  
DeepBlueZ's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by JNorris
That is 93% efficient. What RPM was that measured at?

How about with the Vig 3200?

dont have a number id say 5200 rpm by the peak on the graph????

havent dynoed with the vig yet....
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.