Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which trans would you choose?
Rebuild the 700R4
0
0%
Use the low mileage 4L80E
23
88.46%
Find a low mileage 4L60E
0
0%
Other
3
11.54%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Is the 4L80E worth the extra weight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2010, 09:59 AM
  #21  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
FastKat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,487
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The first gear on the 4L80E isn't quite as deep as the -60E, and the overdrive isn't quite as shallow either (.75 on the -80E vs .70 on the -60E) however this could all be a good thing if it's what you want. The -80E is a "closer ratio" transmission. With the -80E, I think you'll have a shorter gap between 1st and 2nd, and the OD won't feel quite as severe as a 4L60E running somewhat shallow gears. (Sometimes when cruising in overdrive you have to push the pedal down more than you want to get it to downshift.)

I don't really know much about the effects of parasitic loss... would any of that be fixed by a smaller converter? The one on the -80E is a monster...

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
There's more than just added weight, there's added parasitic loss as well. And the 2.48 first gear changes everything coming out of the hole at the track compared to the 3.06 of, say a 4l60. Just some things to consider.



Quick Reply: Is the 4L80E worth the extra weight?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 PM.