Do Circle D converters rob top end?
I had a reputable tuner who is sponsor on this board say that the reason my car is trapping so low is because of the Circle D converter I have. He says they are known for robbing top end, which was news to me as everything I ever read about them was absolutely positive and how well it seems to work in my car.
This issue came up after I did a 224 cam swap on my bolt ons 98 ta with a 3200 circle d converter and my trap speed was only 107. I contacted the guy who did my tune and he said I was SOL and that he did everything he could and my car is basically a turd lol.
The car put down 360 hp/373 which seemed reasonable for how small the cam is, but the trap speed seemed really low. So I contacted another tuner and asked what he thought and he seemed to think that the Circle D converter was robbing my top end and that is why my trap speed was so low.
Is that right?
Chris
Chris
We sell our own line of converters but we never steer anyone away from a Circle-D if that is what they want to use.
A looser converter can sometimes be a bit less efficient on the top end, and sometimes converter slip numbers don't tell the whole story (some combos need a sloppy converter) but I would say in my experience, Circle-D units tend to be more efficient and on the tight side.
Trending Topics
Chris
A couple years ago I upgraded a lot of the components in the tranny. Like the beast sunshell, clutch packs and servos and a shift kit
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
up top (TCC slip RPM). If you go just by the number
it will look pretty bad sometimes (I had a TCI 3000
that was 97% efficient by 5K, have TCI 3500 data
that says 95% but has to get to 6K to get there,
and a TCI 3800 that was south of 90% at 6K).
But what you do not know, is how much of that
slip as %, is going to heat and how much to the
fading tail of torque multiplication. You'd have to
compare locked RWT@MPH to unlocked RWT@MPH,
to gauge that. My low-STR Fuddle is still multiplying
past 5000RPM, going by that kind of comparo. The
little TCI was not.
Look at the ratio of input shaft RPM to output shaft
RPM and compare to nominal in-gear ratio to assess
gearbox friction slip, separately from converter.
up top (TCC slip RPM). If you go just by the number
it will look pretty bad sometimes (I had a TCI 3000
that was 97% efficient by 5K, have TCI 3500 data
that says 95% but has to get to 6K to get there,
and a TCI 3800 that was south of 90% at 6K).
But what you do not know, is how much of that
slip as %, is going to heat and how much to the
fading tail of torque multiplication. You'd have to
compare locked RWT@MPH to unlocked RWT@MPH,
to gauge that. My low-STR Fuddle is still multiplying
past 5000RPM, going by that kind of comparo. The
little TCI was not.
Look at the ratio of input shaft RPM to output shaft
RPM and compare to nominal in-gear ratio to assess
gearbox friction slip, separately from converter.

btw wanna race? another v8 under the belt wouldnt hurt, haha jking
I used my timing tuner and added about 4 degrees of timing and it seems to pull harder on top end. Im thinking the tuner left timing out cuz he wrote me a no2 tune.

btw wanna race? another v8 under the belt wouldnt hurt, haha jking






