Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Non billet converters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2013, 07:52 PM
  #21  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (21)
 
Circle-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

The 278mm is a great choice for a DD TA with a stock or baby cam. It will move the car quite easily, meaning just take your foot off the break and the car will start to go. The 3200 rating is a max flash you will see when you nail it from a stop. It will flash up to 3200 and then start to accelerate. Of course this is assuming you have traction, tire spin will shot the rpm up even further.

Having said all that about the 278mm, the 245mm line is a better converter from a pure performance stand point, even at the same 3200 rating. It will flash faster, less rotating mass and have better shift extensions. So if you are building a cruiser will little to no track visits I think you will love the 278mm. The 216 cam will like the 3200 flash.

Chris
Old 03-26-2013, 08:05 PM
  #22  
Launching!
 
MMWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^ that post finally answered some very important questions I had about all this converter stuff... Thanks Chris for the stout info!!
Old 03-26-2013, 08:27 PM
  #23  
Moderator
 
mrvedit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 7,120
Received 425 Likes on 324 Posts

Default

Yes, this has turned into a very informative thread, one of the better converter threads in a long time.
I've learned a lot anyway.
Old 03-26-2013, 08:47 PM
  #24  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (21)
 
Circle-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Some info on the lock up piston and assuming about 75 PSI for lock up pressure.

12" OE:
Apply surface ~100 square inches
Clutch surface ~20 square inches
Apply force - 7500 pounds

Average non billet
Apply surface ~ 65 square inches
Clutch surface ~ 20-25 square inches
Apply force - 4875 pounds

Average billet
Apply surface ~ 75 square inches
Clutch surface ~ 35 square inches(we get almost 40)
Apply force - 5625 pounds

Gives you a break down comparison on the difference in lock up. The billet also adds a lot of rigidity.

Chris
Old 03-26-2013, 08:58 PM
  #25  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
peteggl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: HAvelock NC
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

One more question and I think i'll have just about all the info I need, will the added weight to the larger converter cause the rest of the transmission to wear down faster?
Old 03-26-2013, 09:42 PM
  #26  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (33)
 
70hemicuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The 278mm is smaller than a stock ls1 converter... 300mm. So that shouldn't be an issue. I'm assuming your current converter is stock
Old 03-27-2013, 08:20 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Revmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Circle-D
Some info on the lock up piston and assuming about 75 PSI for lock up pressure.

12" OE:
Apply surface ~100 square inches
Clutch surface ~20 square inches
Apply force - 7500 pounds

Average non billet
Apply surface ~ 65 square inches
Clutch surface ~ 20-25 square inches
Apply force - 4875 pounds

Average billet
Apply surface ~ 75 square inches
Clutch surface ~ 35 square inches(we get almost 40)
Apply force - 5625 pounds

Gives you a break down comparison on the difference in lock up. The billet also adds a lot of rigidity.

Chris
Hey Chris,

Not to try to undermine your post as it was a very good and informative one. I assume that you know that adding clutch material to the ID of the piston while maintaining the same OD is actually not effective at adding holding capacity.. We have seen this done my many converter builders (NOT Circle D) thinking they are increasing holding capacity.

The median clutch diameter is the true number as to the determining the holding capacity of any clutch. In order to gain holding power you must increase the OD of the friction disc, this in turn increases the median diameter.

As you know the current billet converter pistons are just SLIGHTLY larger on the OD than OEM, but they have a similar ID. This has given converter builders the false security that they have increased clutch capacity greatly, when it fact is only marginally increased.

The above reasons is why triple disc lockup converters were invented in the first place, which Circle D does make a fine one! This is why Circle D, Yank and Revmax all recommend multi disc converters for WOT lockup applications.

Last edited by Revmax; 03-27-2013 at 08:29 AM.
Old 03-27-2013, 08:40 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
Revmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here are some pictures of a non billet lockup clutch, a billet single disc and a billet triple disc clutch assembly.


NON BILLET SINGLE DISC
http://i1255.photobucket.com/albums/...g?t=1364391180

BILLET SINGLE DISC
http://i1255.photobucket.com/albums/...g?t=1364391041

BILLET TRIPLE DISC
http://i1255.photobucket.com/albums/...g?t=1364391041



Quick Reply: Non billet converters



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM.